AntiwhitenessStudiesProf is the username I wanted, as registered on 19th April, after the user known as “iwatchshit” had already made a comment. Now all my reviews are labelled with his name.
NOTE: THIS IS THE PROPER REVIEW. PLEASE DELETE THE OTHER REVIEW I LEFT ON SPARTACUS.
I’ve been having multiple problems with this site, resulting in a lost review of LOTR. Is there anyone I can talk to directly about these issues? I used to be a computer scientist and active engineer (web and software) before I became ill, so I can give useful feedback/bug reports. I *want* to help this site become bigger and better, but it’s frustrating with all the problems, especially concerning my unchosen username and the fact that I, on creating an account with a strong password, inherited the history of a different user. I also think it’d be advisable for anyone who posts one or two good to great reviews to be able to bypass the troll check. I believe this queuing system is how I lost my LOTR review.
I tend to avoid all modern stuff like the plague, especially post-Disney Star Wars. I would take a look at this but I hate this new trend where you have to stop at a certain point (e.g. after S1) because the series becomes intolerably woke or whatever. At least with movies, each one is (supposed to be) a satisfying standalone experience. But with a TV show, it really feels like you’re supposed to see it through to the end. And I can only imagine Andor going downhill from here.
[delete]
Woah, shit. I didn’t realise that Goodreads was doing that. I was actually going to go on a quest to find all the dissident bookshelves etc. before they disappeared. Do you have any saved lists?
The only mitigating factor in my angst is that I visited a bunch of those pages already, so I should be able to refind them on IA or something, *in theory*.
Sounds interesting, thanks! I’ll be sure to check it out when I get the chance and then write a review of my own. You’re quite right about the Indians, of course. I want to make it clear just how much of a “woke” myth the stories about the Amerindians truly are based on my research:
“Peaceful, harmonious, environmentalist” Amerindians are one of America’s new founding myths. It goes hand in hand with the myth that the non-European world was all peace and love and singing “Kumbaya” before coming into contact with the white man, despite the utter brutality of so many non-European regions and civilisations in prehistory and early history. The Arab slave trade is the largest and nastiest in world history, for example, and it continues in some capacity to this day. In many Arabic regions, the slave men were castrated, which is why there is no multicultural state in modern Arabia. Ironically, the horrendous treatment of their victims allowed them to hide the extent of their crimes and not have to deal with the modern consequences (what a perverse, sickening irony that is). What few people know (because they’re certainly never taught this in school) is that millions of white people were among their slave victims, with likely over a million Europeans captured by Barbary pirates in just their few hundred years at sea (whom they kidnapped from coastal regions across Europe, including Cornwall in my native Britain).[1]
It’s an immutable law to which I’ve never seen an exception: every civilisation capable of taking slaves did so (and many also sold their own people into slavery, as is widely known of West Africa). Only anti-white academics portray slavery as some uniquely European institution or try to imply that the trans-Atlantic trade was somehow unique in its scope or harshness. In fact, in the history of slavery, the trans-Atlantic trade was unremarkable. Slavery is *always* diabolical without exception, but if you ended up as a slave in lands controlled by Europeans, you were probably treated better than the average slave across time and space.
In truth, Amerindian tribes were butchering and even genociding each other just fine before the Europeans arrived. Archaeologists and anthropologists in the Boasian mould (read: activist academics like Stephen Jay Gould and Margaret Mead, who lied about their findings in order to promote a dishonest tabula rasa worldview) have long tried to ignore or even hide the mounting hard evidence. Manipulation of the history of pre-Columbian America was incredibly easy due to the fact that they had no written records of their own history and activities, leaving the activist scholars to fill in the blanks (a peer-reviewed paper even admits this: “archaeologists with one or two exceptions have not tried to develop an objective metric of levels of [Amerindian] violence through time”).
This fact is also often used as an anti-white cudgel: we recorded our crimes against others and thus we’re the evil ones because we kept an honest record of what happened. It doesn’t matter that we were the first civilisation to outlaw slavery or that we shed over a million of our own lives in various conflicts in order to achieve it. “Whiteness” in modern academia is original sin that cannot be removed (see [2] which describes it as a “parasitic disease” that “can’t be cured”).[2] How are we to interpret statements from people in positions of power, like prominent professors, that “whiteness must be eradicated”?
Many Amerindian tribes killed and/or tortured (and, in some cases. ritually sacrificed and even cannibalised) each other at a prodigious rate. The Aztecs, Incas, and Mayans were all involved in sacrificial rituals. The Aztecs saw cannibalism as part of their pagan religion. And the towers of skulls outside their villages – long asserted by those same academics to be a Columbian era myth created by the Spanish, but since excavated exactly where the Spaniards said it would be – contained the skulls of women and children. This makes it likely that the same diarists’ descriptions of a cannibal tribe that captured the children of other tribes are also true. Diary extract: “[…] they used to cook for him the meat of young boys […]”.
It wasn’t just a culture that caused all of this. Amerindian tribes cut off from the influences of others engaged in the same activities. The Crow Creek Massacre in the early 1300s remains South Dakota’s bloodiest incident ever, with internecine warfare involving the indiscriminate murder of fleeing children. It’s implied that the young women were likely taken as war brides. Crow Creek is also the origin of some of our earliest and best evidence for the practice of scalping as at least 80% of the skulls thus far exhumed have exhibited telltale signs (as well as further evidence of ritual torture).[3] The Pueblo tribes centred in modern Colorado in the 1100-1200s may have had the highest per capita rate of murder anywhere in world history.[4] There is also new evidence popping up of tribes in Illinois indulging in these behaviours in pre-Columbian American. But it’s hard to keep track of it all and I’m a European *in* Europe, so not an expert on American history.
Far from using “every part of the animal”, Amerindians would regularly drive entire herds of buffalo or bison, in excess of their needs, off of cliffs (“cliff traps” or “cliff jumps”) using fire to induce the animals to jump.[5] Some plains tribes would use the fire itself to encircle the animals and immolate them. In both cases, large parts of the carcases were, for obvious reasons, often unusable. In so far as they did make use of salvageable parts, it was almost certainly a matter of pragmatism over any actual principle: in a preindustrial, Stone Age society, it was only logical to use bone fragments and animal pelts to the best of your ability for whatever purposes you could invent. One imagines that the Western Hunter Gatherer ancestors of modern Europeans did the same with their kills 10,000 years earlier. But, in terms of civilisational advancement, the Europeans who colonised America were so far ahead of the natives that they would’ve reasonably felt that they had no use for e.g. bone fragments in place of complex carpentry and metallurgy. It’s likely that the Amerindians would’ve eventually driven the buffalo to extinction by themselves. Europeans accelerated the process due to raw numbers, use of efficient weapons, and the European explorer instinct to chart every inch of the land.
Sources:
[1] Webb S, “The Forgotten Slave Trade: The White European Slaves of Islam”, Pen & Sword, 2021 (reprint)
[2] Moss D, “On Having Whiteness”, American Psychoanalytic Association, 2020
[3] Rookhuyzen D, “Crow Creek massacre in 1300s remains South Dakota’s worst”, Associated Press, 2015
[4] Kohler T et al., “The Better Angels of Their Nature: Declining Violence through Time among Prehispanic Farmers of the Pueblo Southwest”, American Antiquity, 2014
[5] Whelan R, “Wild Woods: The Myth of the Noble Eco-savage”, Institute of Economic Affairs, 1999
well it is american, and it is all fiction.
HELP ME SAAR IM INDIAN PLEASE FUCKING HELP ME SIR IM INDIAN PLEASE SIR HELP IM INDIAN
OP is retarded
The thing about fucking boys or whatever is another jewish lie and projection by them. Good review
Why the hell would you suggest anyone to consume this even if free?
Hey! The site’s just going through some maintenance right now, but everything will be back to normal soon.
Hey, are you aware the site interface is bugging? I hope this site ain’t dying lol. I know it must be a thankless task keeping it alive. But I need somewhere to post my reviews of random movies lol.
I’m pretty sure one of the Walt Bismarck songs is based on this movie! I’ll give it a watch.
Sorry to hear that bro, hope you’ll stop watching shit sometime.
Who else is going to review the romance films? Not me. I’m relying on you for this.
And yes, men can enjoy this film.
I watched this movie a while ago and I have no problem with this review.
As for the cathedrals and monks: I think that the movie tried to show that no one was concerned with God, but that you must inevitably return to Him even when you’ve built a fucking metropolis.
watch the movie as if it were a theatrical piece, is my recommendation.
rockin’
Aryan? The star is a jew
imagine the smell