All's Faire in Love

Play Trailer

Summary: Two rival Medieval shows vie for supremacy in the world of Renaissance Faires.

Release Date: September 17, 2009

Genre: Comedy

Director: Scott Marshall

Writers: R.A. White

, Scott Marshall

, Jeffrey Ray Wine

Runtime: 1 h 44 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Patriot Pictures, Thats Hollywood, Duke of York, Gold Rush Pictures

Distributor: Hannover House, Regal Entertainment, Freestyle Digital Media, MGM Home Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 22,180

Box office:

Domestic:$22.2KWorldwide:$22.2K

34%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 34% higher than the critics.

7%41%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

22%13%

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

13% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White80%Black13.33%Jewish6.67%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

7%41%

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Methodology

Cast

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other Cast, Production

Other cast:

Production:

Representation

Star

Supporting

Other

Production

Race	White	Jewish	Black	Total	Visuals	Info
Ethnic	6		1	7		This is the most reliable data source for accurate ethnic breakdowns of famous people. Often the information is crowdsourced by users and they cite all their sources (family trees, obituaries, census archives, etc.) on the bottom of the page. The only issue is converting their ambiguous and inconsistent verdicts into quantifiable variables. Source: https://ethnicelebs.com/
Kairos	4		1	5		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos
Forebears	1	3		4
Bettaface	1			1		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.betafaceapi.com/demo_old.html
Familysearch	1			1
Total	13	3	2	18
Cast Percentages	72.22%	16.67%	11.11%	100%	{"name":"Cast Percentages","series":[{"name":"White","y":72.22,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":16.67,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":11.11,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}
U.S. Population (2010) Percentage	63.7%	1.71%	12.6%		{"name":"U.S. Population (2010)","series":[{"name":"White","y":63.7,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":0.55,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":5.61,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":12.6,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Indian","y":0.92,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Indigenous","y":0.9,"color":"#aaeeee"},{"name":"Latino","y":16.3,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":4.56,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Jewish","y":1.71,"color":"#ff0066"}],"prefix":""}	Source: US Census (Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (2010) Representation	+8.52	+14.96	-1.49		{"name":"U.S. Population (2010)","series":[["White",63.7],["Jewish",1.71],["Black",12.6]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":72.22,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":16.67,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Black","y":11.11,"color":"#f45b5b"}]}
U.S. Buying Power (2010) Percentage	77.06%		7.85%		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2010)","series":[{"name":"White","y":9431400000000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":603500000000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":961200000000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":82500000000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":1018000000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":143100000000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: Selig Center, University of Georgia
U.S. Buying Power (2010) Representation	-4.84		+3.26		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2010)","series":[["White",77.06],["Jewish",0],["Black",7.85]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":72.22,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":16.67,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Black","y":11.11,"color":"#f45b5b"}]}
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage	71.15%		9.47%		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":12171466347118,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":1189049387729,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":1620865652423,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":123389392842,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":1400105258356,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":602832559545,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation	+1.07		+1.64		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[["White",71.15],["Jewish",0],["Black",9.47]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":72.22,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":16.67,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Black","y":11.11,"color":"#f45b5b"}]}
World population (2009) Percentage	15.3%	0.34%	12.7%		{"name":"World population (2009) ","series":[{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":12681869669,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":39038138382,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":9530507330,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":104251561526,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":86514066935,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":223481923411,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":55528852386,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":148132790510,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":2299078689,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (2009) Representation	+56.92	+16.33	-1.59		{"name":"World population (2009) ","series":[["White",15.3],["Jewish",0.34],["Black",12.7]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":72.22,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":16.67,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Black","y":11.11,"color":"#f45b5b"}]}
World Buying Power Percentage	36.48%	1.11%	6.38%		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[{"name":"White","y":3010602822170000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":771525888400000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":91700962050000,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":526264226360000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":174285727610000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":148984454560000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":526400066100000,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":2431392083750000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":572687873900000,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation	+35.74	+15.56	+4.73		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[["White",36.48],["Jewish",1.11],["Black",6.38]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":72.22,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":16.67,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Black","y":11.11,"color":"#f45b5b"}]}
Notes		If there were any inconsistencies with percentages calculated using our Census data, the Jewish Data Bank percentages were the ones used. Also please review the Jewish Data Bank pdf to understand the difference between the "Core" Jewish population and the "Extended" / "Law of Return" Jewish populations. We are displaying the "Core" Jewish populations since that is what the Jewish Data Bank and Wikipedia articles chose. Also, the 1942 population estimates were used for the 1940 row. For the 2000 estimates, the "Core" definition was not used, so we used the 5.2 mil broader estimate instead of the 4.3 mil estimate since the 5.2 broader estimate seemed too drastic of a drop and the definitions weren't congruent with Core and Law of Return.

Similar Movies

Similar Movies:

Shakespeare in Love (1998)

Summary: The world's greatest ever playwright, William Shakespeare, is young, out of ideas and short of cash, but meets his ideal woman and is inspired to write one of his most famous plays.

Release Date: January 08, 1999

Genres: Comedy, Drama, History

Director: John Madden

Writers: Marc Norman

, Tom Stoppard

Runtime: 2 h 03 min

MPAA: R

Production: Universal Pictures, Miramax, The Bedford Falls Company

Distributor: Miramax Home Entertainment, Starz, Turner Classic Movies (TCM)

Countries: United States, United Kingdom

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 25,000,000

Domestic: $ 100,317,794

International: $ 189,000,000

Box office:

Budget:$25MDomestic:$100.3MInternational:$189MWorldwide:$289.3M

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Universal Pictures

Miramax

(Paramount Global subsidiary)

-12%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -12% lower than the critics.

92%80%

The Metacritic audience rated this -18% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

87/100

Metacritic User:

69/100

33%0%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White88.89%Jewish11.11%

0.80

LGBTQ content included:

sexual identity

Possibly woke elements:

strong female character

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Violence3/5
Sex4/5
Language3/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 0.80/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

92%80%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Shrek the Third (2007)

Summary: Reluctantly designated as the heir to the land of Far, Far Away, Shrek hatches a plan to install the rebellious Artie as the new king while Princess Fiona tries to fend off a coup d'état by the jilted Prince Charming.

Release Date: May 18, 2007

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Animation

Directors: Chris Miller

, Raman Hui

Writers: Jeffrey Price

, Chris Miller

, William Steig

, Andrew Adamson

Runtime: 1 h 33 min

MPAA: PG

Production: DreamWorks, DreamWorks Animation, Pacific Data Images (PDI)

Distributor: 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, American Broadcasting Company (ABC), DreamWorks Animation Home Entertainment, Paramount Home Entertainment, Peacock, Studio Distribution Services (SDS), Universal Pictures Home Entertainment (UPHE)

Country: United States

Language: English

Franchise: Shrek

Movie budget: $ 160,000,000

Domestic: $ 322,719,944

International: $ 485,588,918

Box office:

Budget:$160MDomestic:$322.7MInternational:$485.6MWorldwide:$808.3M

Possible lazy cash grab:

sequel, third part

Franchise:

Shrek

Adaptation/remake:

based on children's book

Possible Big Business:

Production:

DreamWorks

DreamWorks Animation

11%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 11% higher than the critics.

41%52%

The Metacritic audience rated this 6% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

58/100

Metacritic User:

64/100

28%11%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White83.33%Jewish5.56%Latino5.56%Black5.56%

2.61

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message3/5
Role model3/5
Violence3/5
Sex2/5
Language2/5
Consumerism3/5
Drugs3/5

Dove

Sex1/5
Language1/5
Violence2/5
Drugs2/5
Nudity1/5
Other1/5

This film gets a 2.61/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

41%52%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Brave (2012)

Summary: Determined to make her own path in life, Princess Merida defies a custom that brings chaos to her kingdom. Granted one wish, Merida must rely on her bravery and her archery skills to undo a beastly curse.

Release Date: June 22, 2012

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Animation

Directors: Mark Andrews

, Brenda Chapman

, Steve Purcell

Writers: Brenda Chapman

, Mark Andrews

, Steve Purcell

Runtime: 1 h 33 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Walt Disney Pictures, Pixar Animation Studios

Distributor: Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment, ABC Family, Disney Channel, Freeform, Disney+, FX Network

Countries: United States, Japan, United Kingdom

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 185,000,000

Domestic: $ 237,283,207

International: $ 301,700,000

Box office:

Budget:$185MDomestic:$237.3MInternational:$301.7MWorldwide:$539M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Walt Disney Pictures

Pixar Animation Studios

-4%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -4% lower than the critics.

79%75%

The Metacritic audience rated this 3% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

69/100

Metacritic User:

72/100

40%7%

40% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

7% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White93.33%Mixed / Other6.67%

2.00

Possibly woke elements:

triple f rated,strong female lead,strong female character,feminism,f rated

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Educational2/5
Message4/5
Role model4/5
Violence3/5
Sex2/5
Consumerism3/5
Drugs1/5

This film gets a 2.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

79%75%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Shrek Forever After (2010)

Summary: Rumpelstiltskin tricks a mid-life crisis burdened Shrek into allowing himself to be erased from existence and cast in a dark alternate timeline where Rumpelstiltskin rules supreme.

Release Date: May 21, 2010

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Animation

Director: Mike Mitchell

Writers: Josh Klausner

, Darren Lemke

, William Steig

Runtime: 1 h 33 min

MPAA: PG

Production: DreamWorks Animation, Pacific Data Images (PDI)

Distributor: 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, Cartoon Network, Comedy Central, Discovery Family Channel, DreamWorks Animation Home Entertainment, FX Network, Freeform, HBO Max, MTV Networks, Nickelodeon Network, Paramount Home Entertainment, Paramount Network, Paramount's Worldwide Television Licensing & Distribution and Acquisitions, Peacock, Studio Distribution Services (SDS)

Countries: United States, France

Language: English

Franchise: Shrek

Movie budget: $ 165,000,000

Domestic: $ 238,736,787

International: $ 513,864,080

Box office:

Budget:$165MDomestic:$238.7MInternational:$513.9MWorldwide:$752.6M

Possible lazy cash grab:

sequel, 3d sequel to 2d film, fourth part

Franchise:

Shrek

Adaptation/remake:

based on children's book

Possible Big Business:

Production:

DreamWorks Animation

-3%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -3% lower than the critics.

57%54%

The Metacritic audience rated this 9% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

58/100

Metacritic User:

67/100

44%22%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White66.67%Jewish11.11%Latino11.11%Black11.11%

3.00

Possibly woke elements:

injustice

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Educational1/5
Message3/5
Role model2/5
Violence2/5
Language2/5
Consumerism2/5
Drugs1/5

Dove

Sex1/5
Violence2/5
Drugs1/5
Nudity1/5
Other2/5

This film gets a 3.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

57%54%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

The Brothers Grimm (2005)

Summary: Will and Jake Grimm are traveling con-artists who encounter a genuine fairy-tale curse which requires true courage instead of their usual bogus exorcisms.

Release Date: August 26, 2005

Genres: Action, Adventure, Comedy

Director: Terry Gilliam

Writer: Ehren Kruger

Runtime: 1 h 58 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Dimension Films, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM), Mosaic, Summit Entertainment, The Weinstein Company

Distributor: Dimension Films, Miramax, HBO Max, MGM Television

Countries: Czechia, United Kingdom, United States, Czech Republic

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 88,000,000

Domestic: $ 37,916,267

International: $ 67,400,000

Box office:

Budget:$88MDomestic:$37.9MInternational:$67.4MWorldwide:$105.3M

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM)

The Weinstein Company

Summit Entertainment

(Lionsgate subsidiary)

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 1% higher than the critics.

38%39%

The Metacritic audience rated this 28% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

51/100

Metacritic User:

79/100

28%6%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White88.89%Latino5.56%Jewish5.56%

2.00

Commonsensemedia

Violence3/5
Sex3/5
Language3/5
Drugs3/5

Dove

Sex2/5
Language4/5
Violence4/5
Drugs3/5
Other2/5

This film gets a 2.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

38%39%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Enchanted (2007)

Summary: A young maiden in a land called Andalasia, who is prepared to be wed, is sent away to New York City by an evil Queen, where she falls in love with a lawyer.

Release Date: November 21, 2007

Genres: Comedy, Family, Animation

Director: Kevin Lima

Writer: Bill Kelly

Runtime: 1 h 47 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Walt Disney Pictures, Josephson Entertainment, Andalasia Productions

Distributor: Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment, USA Network, National Broadcasting Company (NBC), ABC Family, Disney Channel, Bravo!, CMT, MTV Networks, Nickelodeon Network, Disney+, Freeform

Countries: United States, Algeria, New Zealand

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 85,000,000

Domestic: $ 127,807,262

International: $ 212,680,607

Box office:

Budget:$85MDomestic:$127.8MInternational:$212.7MWorldwide:$340.5M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Walt Disney Pictures

-13%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -13% lower than the critics.

93%80%

The Metacritic audience rated this 7% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

75/100

Metacritic User:

82/100

50%18%

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

18% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White76.47%Black11.76%Mixed / Other5.88%Jewish5.88%

1.60

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message3/5
Role model4/5
Violence3/5
Consumerism3/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 1.60/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

93%80%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

The Princess Academy (1987)

Summary: Lowbrow humor is the feature in this 'Porky's for girls'. The students of an elite international private school that teaches rich young women how to behave like proper ladies rebel against their strict, snobbish and brutish head t...

Genre: Comedy

Director: Bruce A. Block

Writer: Sandra Weintraub

Runtime: 1 h 30 min

MPAA: R

Production: Cloverleaf, Jadran Film, Sofracima

Distributor: Lightning Video, Vestron Television

Countries: France, United States, Yugoslavia

Language: English

Domestic: $ 205,000

Box office:

Domestic:$205KWorldwide:$205K

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

61%6%

61% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White93.75%Arab6.25%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

gay

Possibly woke elements:

feminist, sexism, prejudice, misogyny

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

IMDb:

OFDb:

Methodology

The Sword in the Stone (1963)

Summary: A poor boy named Arthur learns the power of love, kindness, knowledge and bravery with the help of a wizard called Merlin in the path to become one of the most beloved kings in English history.

Release Date: June 21, 1964

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Animation

Directors: Wolfgang Reitherman

, Clyde Geronimi

, David Hand

Writers: Bill Peet

, T.H. White

Runtime: 1 h 19 min

MPAA: G

Production: Walt Disney Animation Studios

Distributor: Buena Vista Pictures, Walt Disney Telecommunications and Non-Theatrical Company, WGN, Buena Vista Home Video, Walt Disney Home Video, Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment, Disney+

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 3,000,000

Domestic: $ 12,000,000

Box office:

Budget:$3MDomestic:$12MWorldwide:$12M

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel, based on book

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Walt Disney Animation Studios

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 7% higher than the critics.

66%73%

The Metacritic audience rated this 13% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

61/100

Metacritic User:

74/100

19%0%

19% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White91.67%Jewish8.33%

2.60

BechdeltestNo 2 women

Commonsensemedia

Message4/5
Role model4/5
Violence2/5
Sex1/5
Language1/5
Drugs1/5

This film gets a 2.60/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

66%73%

Douban:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Robin Hood: Men in Tights (1993)

Summary: A spoof of Robin Hood in general, and Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves (1991) in particular.

Release Date: July 28, 1993

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Musical

Director: Mel Brooks

Writers: J.D. Shapiro

, Evan Chandler

, Mel Brooks

Runtime: 1 h 44 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Brooksfilms, Gaumont

Distributor: Fox Video, Fox Network, Disney Channel, 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, YouTube

Countries: United States, France

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 20,000,000

Domestic: $ 35,739,755

Box office:

Budget:$20MDomestic:$35.7MWorldwide:$35.7M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Gaumont

40%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 40% higher than the critics.

41%81%

The Metacritic audience rated this 16% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

44/100

Metacritic User:

60/100

17%17%

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White66.67%Jewish16.67%Black11.11%Mixed / Other5.56%

2.00

LGBTQ content included:

cross dressing

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Violence2/5
Sex3/5
Language3/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs2/5

This film gets a 2.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

41%81%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Mirror Mirror (2012)

Summary: An evil queen steals control of a kingdom and an exiled princess enlists the help of seven resourceful rebels to win back her birthright.

Release Date: March 30, 2012

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Drama

Director: Tarsem Singh

Writers: Marc Klein

, Jason Keller

, Melisa Wallack

Runtime: 1 h 46 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Relativity Media, Yucaipa Films, Goldmann Pictures, Rat Entertainment, Misha Films, Mel's Cite du Cinema, Misher Films

Distributor: Relativity Media, 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, Netflix, American Broadcasting Company (ABC), Uv Rml Films

Countries: United States, Canada

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 85,000,000

Domestic: $ 64,935,167

International: $ 118,083,355

Box office:

Budget:$85MDomestic:$64.9MInternational:$118.1MWorldwide:$183M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Adaptation/remake:

based on fairy tale, remake

-6%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -6% lower than the critics.

50%44%

The Metacritic audience rated this 6% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

46/100

Metacritic User:

52/100

22%18%

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

18% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White64.71%Jewish17.65%Asian11.76%Black5.88%

3.50

Possibly woke elements:

strong female lead,strong female character,class differences,f rated

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Educational2/5
Message3/5
Role model2/5
Violence2/5
Sex2/5
Language1/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs1/5

Dove

Sex1/5
Language1/5
Violence1/5
Drugs1/5
Nudity1/5
Other1/5

This film gets a 3.50/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

50%44%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

The Court Jester (1955)

Summary: A hapless carnival performer masquerades as the court jester as part of a plot against an evil ruler who has overthrown the rightful King.

Release Date: January 27, 1956

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Family

Directors: Melvin Frank

, Norman Panama

Writers: Norman Panama

, Melvin Frank

Runtime: 1 h 41 min

MPAA: Approved

Production: Dena Enterprises

Distributor: Paramount Home Entertainment, Warner Archive Collection

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 4,000,000

Budget:$4M

-4%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -4% lower than the critics.

97%93%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

17%0%

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White93.75%Jewish6.25%

4.20

BechdeltestTalk about a man

Commonsensemedia

Violence2/5

This film gets a 4.20/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

97%93%

IMDb:

OFDb:

Methodology

Georgy Girl (1966)

Summary: A homely but vivacious young woman dodges the amorous attentions of her father's middle-aged employer while striving to capture some of the glamorous life of her swinging London roommate.

Release Date: October 17, 1966

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Silvio Narizzano

Writers: Margaret Forster

, Peter Nichols

Runtime: 1 h 39 min

MPAA: Approved

Production: Everglades Productions

Distributor: American Broadcasting Company (ABC), RCA/Columbia Pictures Home Video

Country: United Kingdom

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 400,000

Budget:$400K

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel

-21%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -21% lower than the critics.

91%70%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

44%0%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White100%

N/A

BechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

91%70%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Snow White and the Three Stooges (1961)

Summary: An ice-skating Snow White finds refuge from the Wicked Queen with the Three Stooges.

Release Date: June 21, 1961

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Family

Directors: Walter Lang

, Frank Tashlin

Writers: Noel Langley

, Elwood Ullman

, Charles Wick

Runtime: 1 h 47 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Chanford Productions, Twentieth Century Fox

Distributor: Twentieth Century Fox, U.M.&M. TV, Playhouse Video, CBS/Fox, U.M.&M. TV, Fox Video, 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, Disney+

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 3,500,000

Budget:$3.5M

N/A

The average Rotten Tomatoes audience score is 50%.

50%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

22%6%

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White76.47%Jewish17.65%Mixed / Other5.88%

N/A

BechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

50%

IMDb:

OFDb:

Methodology

The Adventures of Baron Munchausen (1988)

Summary: An account of Baron Munchausen's supposed travels and fantastical experiences across late 18th-century Europe with his band of misfits.

Release Date: March 10, 1989

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Fantasy

Director: Terry Gilliam

Writers: Charles McKeown

, Terry Gilliam

, Gottfried August Bürger

Runtime: 2 h 06 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Prominent Features, Laura Film, Allied Filmmakers

Distributor: Columbia TriStar Home Video, RCA/Columbia Pictures Home Video, Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, The Criterion Collection

Countries: United Kingdom, United States, West Germany

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 46,630,000

Domestic: $ 8,083,123

Box office:

Budget:$46.6MDomestic:$8.1MWorldwide:$8.1M

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

22%6%

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White88.89%Black5.56%Jewish5.56%

1.15

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Message1/5
Violence3/5
Sex3/5
Language2/5
Drugs1/5

This film gets a 1.15/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Your Highness (2011)

Summary: When Prince Fabious's bride is kidnapped, he goes on a quest to rescue her... accompanied by his lazy useless brother Thadeous.

Release Date: April 08, 2011

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Fantasy

Director: David Gordon Green

Writers: Danny McBride

, Ben Best

Runtime: 1 h 42 min

MPAA: R

Production: Universal Pictures, Bluegrass Films

Distributor: Universal Pictures, HBO Max, Home Box Office (HBO), Peacock, Universal Pictures Home Entertainment (UPHE)

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 49,900,000

Domestic: $ 21,596,445

International: $ 6,417,288

Box office:

Budget:$49.9MDomestic:$21.6MInternational:$6.4MWorldwide:$28M

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Universal Pictures

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 7% higher than the critics.

27%34%

The Metacritic audience rated this 19% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

31/100

Metacritic User:

50/100

33%6%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White70.59%Jewish23.53%Black5.88%

0.10

LGBTQ content included:

LGB:

gay, gay character, gay subtext, male male kiss

QTIA+:

beastiality

Possibly woke elements:

strong female character, action heroine

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Violence4/5
Sex4/5
Language5/5
Drugs4/5

Dove

Sex5/5
Language5/5
Violence5/5
Drugs5/5
Nudity4/5
Other5/5

This film gets a 0.10/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

27%34%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Penelope (2006)

Summary: A modern romantic tale about a young aristocratic heiress born under a curse that can only be broken when she finds true love with "one who will accept her as one of their own."

Release Date: February 01, 2008

Genres: Comedy, Fantasy, Romance

Director: Mark Palansky

Writer: Leslie Caveny

Runtime: 1 h 44 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Summit Entertainment, Stone Village Pictures, Type A Films, Tatira, Grosvenor Park Media, Zephyr Films

Distributor: Summit Entertainment, Summit Home Entertainment

Countries: United Kingdom, United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 15,000,000

Domestic: $ 10,011,996

International: $ 11,144,274

Box office:

Budget:$15MDomestic:$10MInternational:$11.1MWorldwide:$21.2M

Production:

Summit Entertainment

(Lionsgate subsidiary)

20%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 20% higher than the critics.

53%73%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

33%0%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White100%

2.00

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Drugs3/5

Dove

Sex2/5
Language2/5
Violence1/5
Drugs1/5
Nudity1/5
Other1/5

This film gets a 2.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

53%73%

ZR Audience:

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Pygmalion (1938)

Summary: A phonetics and diction expert makes a bet that he can teach a cockney flower girl to speak proper English and pass as a lady in high society.

Release Date: March 03, 1939

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Directors: Anthony Asquith

, Leslie Howard

Writers: George Bernard Shaw

, W.P. Lipscomb

, Cecil Lewis

Runtime: 1 h 29 min

MPAA: Approved

Production: Pascal Film Productions

Distributor: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM), Ellis Films, Embassy Home Entertainment, The Criterion Collection, HBO Max, Nelson Entertainment, New Line Home Video, The Criterion Channel

Country: United Kingdom

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 87,000

Budget:$87K

Adaptation/remake:

based on play

-9%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -9% lower than the critics.

94%85%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

67%12%

67% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

12% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White88.24%Asian5.88%Mixed / Other5.88%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

prejudice,class differences

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

94%85%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

The Second Mother (2015)

Summary: When the estranged daughter of a hard-working live-in housekeeper suddenly appears, the unspoken class barriers that exist within the home are thrown into disarray.

Release Date: August 28, 2015

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Anna Muylaert

Writer: Anna Muylaert

Runtime: 1 h 52 min

MPAA: R

Production: Gullane, Africa Filmes, Globo Filmes

Distributor: Oscilloscope, Topic, The Criterion Channel

Country: Brazil

Language: Portuguese

Movie budget: $ 4,000,000

Domestic: $ 376,986

International: $ 2,626,574

Box office:

Budget:$4MDomestic:$377KInternational:$2.6MWorldwide:$3M

-7%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -7% lower than the critics.

97%90%

The Metacritic audience rated this 1% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

82/100

Metacritic User:

83/100

59%44%

59% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White56.25%Latino43.75%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

class differences,f rated

BechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

97%90%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Hoodwinked Too! Hood vs. Evil (2011)

Summary: Red Riding Hood is training in the group of Sister Hoods, when she and the Wolf are called to examine the sudden mysterious disappearance of Hansel and Gretel.

Release Date: April 29, 2011

Genres: Comedy, Crime, Animation

Director: Mike Disa

Writers: Cory Edwards

, Todd Edwards

, Tony Leech

Runtime: 1 h 26 min

MPAA: PG

Production: The Weinstein Company, Kanbar Entertainment, HW Two

Distributor: The Weinstein Company, Anchor Bay Entertainment

Countries: Canada, United States, Serbia

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 30,000,000

Domestic: $ 10,143,779

International: $ 13,696,571

Box office:

Budget:$30MDomestic:$10.1MInternational:$13.7MWorldwide:$23.8M

Possible lazy cash grab:

sequel, second part

Possible Big Business:

Production:

The Weinstein Company

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

22%28%

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White66.67%Mixed / Other11.11%Black11.11%Latino5.56%Jewish5.56%

1.80

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Role model2/5
Violence3/5
Language2/5

This film gets a 1.80/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

Douban:

IMDb:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Enemies, a Love Story (1989)

Summary: A ghostwriter finds himself romantically involved with his current wife, a married woman and his long-vanished wife.

Release Date: December 13, 1989

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Paul Mazursky

Writers: Isaac Bashevis Singer

, Roger L. Simon

, Paul Mazursky

Runtime: 1 h 59 min

MPAA: 14A

Production: Morgan Creek Entertainment

Distributor: Media Home Entertainment, Image Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 9,500,000

Domestic: $ 7,754,571

Box office:

Budget:$9.5MDomestic:$7.8MWorldwide:$7.8M

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel

-35%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -35% lower than the critics.

88%53%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

44%6%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White62.5%Jewish31.25%Mixed / Other6.25%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

polygamy

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

88%53%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Other sources

Parental Guide

Parental Guide: +add

MPAA Certification

No MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?

IMDb Rating

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1034090/parentalguide

last updated: 2024-10-26Update data

Commonsensemedia Rating

https://www.commonsensemedia.org

last updated: 2024-09-27Update data

Methodology

Other sources

boxofficemom.com
commonsensemedia.org
crosswalk.com

Global Consensus

Kinopoisk

rating: 5.5/10

douban:

Submit your review:

* required

Critic Name

Enter your name or leave the field blank.

Password

Create a password or enter an existing one. ( Please remember your password or you will lose your username forever. Recovery emails are optional and can be added later in User Settings. )

Review Title

Rating*

Rating is just the typical 5 star rating you'd give the film like you'd see on any other review site.

Support*

Support is a boycott suggestion and is meant to be a way for us to consolidate our efforts in “voting with our dollars.” Obviously, Hollywood has proven that they will sacrifice profits for the sake of their agenda, but they’re not as monolithic as you’d think. And people still respond to incentives.

So the 3 options are:

Pay to watch:

This movie is worth your time, and you should support the creators financially so we get more content like it.

Watch it AND give them money.

Watch if free:

The show is entertaining, but you shouldn’t reward the creators for whatever reason. Perhaps you don't want to support preachy celebs who hate their fans. Or maybe you enjoy superhero movies and nostalgia bait, but don't want to encourage Hollywood to continue making them in such a high ratio.

That’s when you’d click the “Watch Now” button and choose from one of the “Free” links:

( Use at your own risk. ZeitgeistReviews does not endorse any of the links and we don’t condone piracy. And we definitely discourage you from using this Reddit thread that shows you all of the places to pirate movies & tv. )

Watch it BUT don’t give them money.

Skip it:

This means the movie wasn’t even worth your time. Maybe it's so full of Woke crap that you’ll want to pull your hair out half way through. Or it could simply just be a piece of s**t, and not in a "so bad it's good" kind of way.

Don’t watch it AND don’t give them money.

( Note: We have expanded our site from just TV & Movies. Now we have games and will add music/books/etc. So the wording might change but the sentiment is still the same for every "Support" section. )

Review text*

Note: Please wrap spoilers [spoiler] like this. [/spoiler]

Neo-Marxism

Neo-Marxism, (sometimes referred to as "Cultural Marxism"), rates the amount of fanatic egalitarianism in a film. Consider this mainly a rating for anti-nationalist and anti-capitalist themes.

Feminism

Strong and multidimensional female characters are fine. This is mainly referring to girlboss crap, unrealistic Mary Sue content, and/or egregious scenes of manhood being disparaged.

Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action rates how much "diversity" is being pushed. ( Not true diversity, but the anti-White checklist kind.)

Gay Stuff

Gay Stuff rates the amount of non-tradional sexuality depicted.

Fedora Tipping

Fedora Tipping rates the amount of atheism / Scientism™ in a film.

Audience Reviews:

No results found

Critic Reviews:

Submit a review link

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

All movie subreddits All TV subreddits All gaming subreddits

Comments:

Your Name:

Password:

Cancel Comment

All's Faire in Love

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

Similar Movies:

Parental Guide: +add

IMDb Rating

Commonsensemedia Rating

douban:

Submit your review:

Pay to watch:

Watch if free:

Skip it:

Additional ratings

Audience Reviews:

Critic Reviews:

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

Comments: