Bait

Summary: Martin is a fisherman without a boat, his brother Steven having re-purposed it as a tourist tripper. With their childhood home now a get-away for London money, Martin is displaced to the estate above the harbour.

Release Date: April 18, 2023

Genre: Drama

Director: Mark Jenkin

Writer: Mark Jenkin

Runtime: 1 h 29 min

Production: Early Day Films

Distributor: Neon

Country: United Kingdom

Language: English

Box office:

Worldwide:$740.2K

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

39%0%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White100%

2.21

IMDb

VIOLENCEModeratePROFANITYModerateALCOHOLMildFRIGHTENINGMild

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Role model2/5
Violence3/5
Sex3/5
Language4/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 2.21/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Cast

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other Cast, Production

Other cast:

Production:

Representation

Star

Supporting

Other

Production

Race	White	Latino	Total	Visuals	Info
Kairos	11		11		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos
Forebears	6		6
Familysearch		1	1
Total	17	1	18
Cast Percentages	94.44%	5.56%	100%	{"name":"Cast Percentages","series":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}
U.S. Population (2020) Percentage	57.84%	18.73%		{"name":"U.S. Population (2020)","series":[{"name":"White","y":57.84,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":0.54,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":6,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":12.4,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Indian","y":1.35,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Indigenous","y":1.12,"color":"#aaeeee"},{"name":"Latino","y":18.73,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":9.32,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Jewish","y":2.02,"color":"#ff0066"}],"prefix":""}	Source: US Census (Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (2020) Representation	+36.6	-13.17		{"name":"U.S. Population (2020)","series":[["White",57.84],["Latino",18.73]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
U.S. Buying Power (2018) Percentage	74.35%	9.42%		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":12147700000000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":1013300000000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":1300200000000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":114600000000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":1539000000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":224700000000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: Selig Center, University of Georgia
U.S. Buying Power (2018) Representation	+20.09	-3.86		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2018)","series":[["White",74.35],["Latino",9.42]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage	65.34%	9.51%		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":11825174998483,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":1360705388565,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":1706765993728,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":164296821776,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":1721419354421,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":1318328353188,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation	+29.1	-3.95		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[["White",65.34],["Latino",9.51]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
World population (2019) Percentage	14.24%	5.62%		{"name":"World population (2019) ","series":[{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":14688882870,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":42991259469,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":10971786583,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":108889096410,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":110601821551,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":238860161621,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":67406299429,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":167470202093,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":2568698093,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (2019) Representation	+80.2	-0.06		{"name":"World population (2019) ","series":[["White",14.24],["Latino",5.62]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
World Buying Power Percentage	36.48%	9.35%		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[{"name":"White","y":3010602822170000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":771525888400000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":91700962050000,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":526264226360000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":174285727610000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":148984454560000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":526400066100000,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":2431392083750000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":572687873900000,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation	+57.96	-3.79		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[["White",36.48],["Latino",9.35]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
Notes		Many Latinos check "White" or "Other" on the Census. So this overlaps with "Mixed" race and "White." Also, when there was a discrepancy with the percentage listed on the Wikipedia table and our calculated numbers, the Wiki table's numbers were used. Likewise, when the population total was missing from the Census pdf, the estimate was calculated using the percentage from the Wiki table. NOTE: It turns out that the reason America doesn't have a separate "Latino" race is because the League of Latin American Citizens protested against discrimination towards Mexicans and got themselves to legally be considered "White." Check the research links in our Google Doc for more info.

Tags / Keywords

boat brother brother conflict brother brother relationship cove experimental film family relationships fisherman fishing fishing boat independent film one word title surrealism title spoken by character tourism

Similar Movies

Parental Guide

Parental Guide: +add

This film gets a 2.21/5 family friendly score

International Certification	Australia : MA15+Denmark : 15Germany : Not RatedIreland : 15ANew Zealand : MNorway : 12Singapore : NC16Spain : 12Sweden : 11United Kingdom : 15,15
IMDb Rating https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9652782/parentalguide last updated: 2024-05-28Update data
Nudity None	Nudity: None Sex: A couple of none explicit depictions
Violence Moderate	A man is head butted on the nose
Profanity Moderate	Strong language (fck) and one use of very strong language (cnt).
Alcohol Mild	Alcohol: Social drinking. Very brief depiction of young man suffering the after effects of too much drink. Drugs: Brief depiction of someone smoking a joint. Smoking: A main character is a cigarette smoker
Frightening Mild	Some intense arguments. A general sense of dread.
Commonsensemedia Rating https://www.commonsensemedia.org/movie-reviews/bait last updated: 2024-05-28Update data
Message 2/5	Class is a key theme. Shows how a failure to put aside differences can result in disastrous consequences. Hard work, despite trying circumstances. Examples of kindness shown to those in need.
Role model 2/5	All characters have flaws, including a quick temper, snobbish attitudes, stubbornness. Issue of class and gentrification is prominent throughout -- some characters form relationships despite this divide, but most don't. Katie is perhaps the best example of bridging the gap between the locals and the invading rich tourists. Martin, despite his faults, shows kindness by giving free fish to those who can't afford them. Some stereotyping: The working class are shown to be hardworking but quick-tempered; the more affluent city dwellers are snobbish, arrogant.
Violence 3/5	A character is head butted, resulting in a bloody nose. One character grabs another around the neck. A violent struggle sees a character hitting his head, resulting in much blood, death. Many characters demonstrate aggressive behavior. In one scene, a character kicks a door down and smashes a mirror. A knife is used in a passive-aggressive manner.
Sex 3/5	Kissing. Two teens are in a sexual relationship and are seen on more than one occasion, presumably naked, under a bed sheet. One character appears with just a sheet wrapped around her; a male character is shown without a shirt on. One reference to sucking a "d--k." Character wears a penis costume. Topless bust on display in the pub.
Language 4/5	Strong language throughout, including "c--t," "s--t," "bloody," "hell," "pr--k," "bugger," "piss," "d--khead," "d--k," "God" (as an exclamation), and variants of "f--k."
Drugs 3/5	Adults and teens drink regularly. Someone is sick, presumably from drinking too much, and another character is hung over. Much of the movie takes place in a pub. Characters smoke roll-up cigarettes and in one scene, a marijuana joint.

Methodology

Other sources

boxofficemom.com
commonsensemedia.org
crosswalk.com

Global Consensus

Submit your review:

* required

Critic Name

Enter your name or leave the field blank.

Password

Create a password or enter an existing one. ( Please remember your password or you will lose your username forever. Recovery emails are optional and can be added later in User Settings. )

Review Title

Rating*

Rating is just the typical 5 star rating you'd give the film like you'd see on any other review site.

Support*

Support is a boycott suggestion and is meant to be a way for us to consolidate our efforts in “voting with our dollars.” Obviously, Hollywood has proven that they will sacrifice profits for the sake of their agenda, but they’re not as monolithic as you’d think. And people still respond to incentives.

So the 3 options are:

Pay to watch:

This movie is worth your time, and you should support the creators financially so we get more content like it.

Watch it AND give them money.

Watch if free:

The show is entertaining, but you shouldn’t reward the creators for whatever reason. Perhaps you don't want to support preachy celebs who hate their fans. Or maybe you enjoy superhero movies and nostalgia bait, but don't want to encourage Hollywood to continue making them in such a high ratio.

That’s when you’d click the “Watch Now” button and choose from one of the “Free” links:

( Use at your own risk. ZeitgeistReviews does not endorse any of the links and we don’t condone piracy. And we definitely discourage you from using this Reddit thread that shows you all of the places to pirate movies & tv. )

Watch it BUT don’t give them money.

Skip it:

This means the movie wasn’t even worth your time. Maybe it's so full of Woke crap that you’ll want to pull your hair out half way through. Or it could simply just be a piece of s**t, and not in a "so bad it's good" kind of way.

Don’t watch it AND don’t give them money.

( Note: We have expanded our site from just TV & Movies. Now we have games and will add music/books/etc. So the wording might change but the sentiment is still the same for every "Support" section. )

Review text*

Note: Please wrap spoilers [spoiler] like this. [/spoiler]

Neo-Marxism

Neo-Marxism, (sometimes referred to as "Cultural Marxism"), rates the amount of fanatic egalitarianism in a film. Consider this mainly a rating for anti-nationalist and anti-capitalist themes.

Feminism

Strong and multidimensional female characters are fine. This is mainly referring to girlboss crap, unrealistic Mary Sue content, and/or egregious scenes of manhood being disparaged.

Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action rates how much "diversity" is being pushed. ( Not true diversity, but the anti-White checklist kind.)

Gay Stuff

Gay Stuff rates the amount of non-tradional sexuality depicted.

Fedora Tipping

Fedora Tipping rates the amount of atheism / Scientism™ in a film.

Audience Reviews:

No results found

Critic Reviews:

Film Discussion: Four Films Set in Rural Britain

I welcome on Survive the Jive for May Day. Cigar: Drew Estate Undercrown Sungrown Corona Films under focus: 1. Straw Dogs (1971) 2. The Wicker Man (1973) 3. Requiem for a Village (1976) 4....

Proper Review

May 2nd 2020

Survive the Jive

#DissidentRight #Pagan

Submit a review link

Blogosphere / Vlogosphere:

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

All movie subreddits All TV subreddits All gaming subreddits

Comments:

Your Name:

Password:

Cancel Comment

Bait

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

Parental Guide: +add

IMDb Rating

Commonsensemedia Rating

Submit your review:

Pay to watch:

Watch if free:

Skip it:

Additional ratings

Audience Reviews:

Critic Reviews:

Blogosphere / Vlogosphere:

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

Comments: