Dave Made a Maze

Summary: Dave, an artist who has yet to complete anything significant in his career, builds a fort in his living room out of pure frustration, only to wind up trapped by the fantastical pitfalls, booby traps, and critters of his own creation.

Release Date: August 18, 2017

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Fantasy

Director: Bill Watterson

Writers: Steven Sears

, Bill Watterson

Runtime: 1 h 20 min

MPAA: 14A

Production: Butter Stories, Dave Made An LLC, Foton Pictures

Distributor: Gravitas Ventures

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 34,117

Box office:

Domestic:$34.1KWorldwide:$34.1K

-16%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -16% lower than the critics.

86%70%

The Metacritic audience rated this 7% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

60/100

Metacritic User:

67/100

41%0%

41% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White94.12%Jewish5.88%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

86%70%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

Star

Supporting

Other

Production

Race	White	Black	Total	Visuals	Info
Kairos	8		8		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos
Forebears	4	1	5
Ethnic	4		4		This is the most reliable data source for accurate ethnic breakdowns of famous people. Often the information is crowdsourced by users and they cite all their sources (family trees, obituaries, census archives, etc.) on the bottom of the page. The only issue is converting their ambiguous and inconsistent verdicts into quantifiable variables. Source: https://ethnicelebs.com/
Bettaface	1		1		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.betafaceapi.com/demo_old.html
Total	17	1	18
Cast Percentages	94.44%	5.56%	100%	{"name":"Cast Percentages","series":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":5.56,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}
U.S. Population (1970) Percentage	83.2%	11.1%		{"name":"U.S. Population (1970)","series":[{"name":"White","y":83.2,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":0.76,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":11.1,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Indigenous","y":0.4,"color":"#aaeeee"},{"name":"Latino","y":4.4,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":0.3,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Jewish","y":2.63,"color":"#ff0066"}],"prefix":""}	Source: US Census (Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (1970) Representation	+11.24	-5.54		{"name":"U.S. Population (1970)","series":[["White",83.2],["Black",11.1]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Black","y":5.56,"color":"#f45b5b"}]}
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Percentage	81.25%	7.72%		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[{"name":"White","y":6413300000000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":276400000000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":609100000000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":40300000000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":494000000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":60300000000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: Selig Center, University of Georgia
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Representation	+13.19	-2.16		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[["White",81.25],["Black",7.72]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Black","y":5.56,"color":"#f45b5b"}]}
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage	88.52%	7.95%		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":10186075459123,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":103212124404,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":914912466905,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":35137867565,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":242161920000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":25411669920,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation	+5.92	-2.39		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[["White",88.52],["Black",7.95]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Black","y":5.56,"color":"#f45b5b"}]}
World population (1966) Percentage	23.27%	8.91%		{"name":"World population (1966) ","series":[{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":6429598255,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":18731521174,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":3912463521,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":78478734583,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":30030137441,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":118449011510,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":19343300288,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":60519269777,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":1296182833,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (1966) Representation	+71.17	-3.35		{"name":"World population (1966) ","series":[["White",23.27],["Black",8.91]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Black","y":5.56,"color":"#f45b5b"}]}
World Buying Power Percentage	36.48%	6.38%		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[{"name":"White","y":3010602822170000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":771525888400000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":91700962050000,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":526264226360000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":174285727610000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":148984454560000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":526400066100000,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":2431392083750000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":572687873900000,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation	+57.96	-0.82		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[["White",36.48],["Black",6.38]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Black","y":5.56,"color":"#f45b5b"}]}
Notes

30 year old absurdism acoustics anger animated closing credits animated sequence animation during opening credits animation during opening credits ant farm apartment apology art artist baggie beard black and white sequence blackboard blood bloodlust booby trap box cutter boyfriend girlfriend relationship broke bushido blade buzz saw camera candle cardboard cardboard puppet cardboard puppet carpentry cartoon version of characters cartoon version of characters cell phone characters murdered one by one circular saw coffee craft project craft project dart dead end death death maze death maze decapitation documentary filmmaker duffle bag electric fan electricity eyeglasses f word fast motion scene film crew flash forward flashback forced perspective fort freedom friend friendship garbage can hand palm slap high five hoofprint impalement in medias res injured hand interview keyboard knocking knocking on a door labyrinth living room lost machinery magical realism maze microphone microphone boom minotaur missing someone money monster montage name calling narration during opening credits nerd optical illusion origami origami bird paper bird paper bird paper costume paper costume paper cut paper flame paper flame paper flower paper male genitalia paper male genitalia paper mask paper mask paper stalactite paper stalactite paper stalagmite paper stalagmite paper vagina paper vagina paranormal phenomenon peanut butter pendulum axe pendulum axe photographer piano music pizza playing cards power source prologue promise puppet puppet version of character puppet version of character push button record player recycling red yarn red yarn reference to betty friedan reference to betty friedan reference to john cougar mellencamp refrigerator box refrigerator box rescue rhyming samurai sword sandwich scissors severed head shadow dancer shoes smoke spike split screen stop motion animation subjective camera suitcase surrealism suspense suspicion of adultery tape techno music telephone telephone call tesseract time lapse photography title spoken by character trance trap trapped treference to trail mix treference to trail mix turning into cardboard turning into cardboard video camera viewfinder voice over narration wadding up paper wadding up paper watching a movie wedding dress wine yoga yoga mat

Similar Movies:

Escape from Alcatraz (1979)

Summary: Alcatraz is the most secure prison of its time. It is believed that no one can ever escape from it, until three daring men make a possibly successful attempt at escaping from one of the most infamous prisons in the world.

Release Date: June 22, 1979

Genres: Action, Crime, Biography

Director: Don Siegel

Writers: J. Campbell Bruce

, Richard Tuggle

Runtime: 1 h 52 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Paramount Pictures, Paramount Pictures, The Malpaso Company, The Malpaso Company

Distributor: Paramount Home Entertainment, American Broadcasting Company (ABC), American Movie Classics (AMC), Paramount Television, Trifecta Entertainment and Media

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 8,000,000

Domestic: $ 43,000,000

International: $ 5,351

Box office:

Budget:$8MDomestic:$43MInternational:$5.4KWorldwide:$43M

Adaptation/remake:

based on true story, based on novel

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Paramount Pictures

-11%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -11% lower than the critics.

96%85%

The Metacritic audience rated this 2% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

76/100

Metacritic User:

78/100

0%17%

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White83.33%Asian5.56%Black5.56%Latino5.56%

1.00

LGBTQ content included:

gay, homosexuality

Possibly woke elements:

interracial, interracial friendship

BechdeltestNo 2 women

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Role model2/5
Violence3/5
Sex3/5
Language3/5
Drugs1/5

Dove

Sex2/5
Language4/5
Violence3/5
Drugs1/5
Nudity3/5
Other1/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

96%85%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Hot Fuzz (2007)

Summary: An overachieving London police sergeant is transferred to a village where the easygoing officers object to his fervor for regulations, all while a string of grisly murders strikes the town.

Release Date: April 20, 2007

Genres: Action, Comedy, Mystery

Director: Edgar Wright

Writers: Edgar Wright

, Simon Pegg

Runtime: 2 h 01 min

MPAA: R

Production: Universal Pictures, StudioCanal, Working Title Films

Distributor: Rogue Pictures, Universal Pictures Home Entertainment (UPHE)

Countries: United Kingdom, France

Language: English

Franchise: Three Flavours Cornetto

Movie budget: $ 8,000,000

Domestic: $ 23,637,265

International: $ 56,943,756

Box office:

Budget:$8MDomestic:$23.6MInternational:$56.9MWorldwide:$80.6M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Possible lazy cash grab:

Franchise:

Three Flavours Cornetto

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Universal Pictures

Working Title Films

-2%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -2% lower than the critics.

91%89%

The Metacritic audience rated this 6% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

81/100

Metacritic User:

87/100

17%6%

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White94.12%Latino5.88%

1.00

LGBTQ content included:

gay, gay subtext

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Message1/5
Role model2/5
Violence4/5
Sex1/5
Language5/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs2/5

Dove

Sex2/5
Language4/5
Violence5/5
Drugs3/5
Other3/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

91%89%

ZR Audience:

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Everything Is Illuminated (2005)

Summary: A young Jewish American man, with the help of an eccentric local, endeavors to find the woman who saved his grandfather during World War II in a Ukrainian village that was ultimately razed by the Nazis.

Release Date: November 04, 2005

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Liev Schreiber

Writers: Jonathan Safran Foer

, Liev Schreiber

Runtime: 1 h 46 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Warner Independent Pictures (WIP), Telegraph Films, Big Beach Films, Stillking Films

Distributor: Warner Independent Pictures (WIP), Warner Home Video

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 7,000,000

Domestic: $ 1,712,337

International: $ 1,889,637

Box office:

Budget:$7MDomestic:$1.7MInternational:$1.9MWorldwide:$3.6M

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel

23%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 23% higher than the critics.

66%89%

The Metacritic audience rated this 19% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

58/100

Metacritic User:

77/100

28%12%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

12% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White82.35%Asian11.76%Jewish5.88%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

homosexual, lesbian

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

66%89%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

White Chicks (2004)

Summary: Two disgraced FBI agents go way undercover in an effort to protect hotel heiresses the Wilson sisters from a kidnapping plot.

Release Date: June 23, 2004

Genres: Comedy, Crime

Director: Keenen Ivory Wayans

Writers: Keenen Ivory Wayans

, Shawn Wayans

, Marlon Wayans

Runtime: 1 h 49 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Revolution Studios, Wayans Bros. Entertainment, Gone North Productions

Distributor: Sony Pictures Releasing, Fox Network

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 37,000,000

Domestic: $ 70,831,760

International: $ 42,269,113

Box office:

Budget:$37MDomestic:$70.8MInternational:$42.3MWorldwide:$113.1M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

40%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 40% higher than the critics.

15%55%

The Metacritic audience rated this 25% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

41/100

Metacritic User:

66/100

50%39%

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White55.56%Black33.33%Mixed / Other5.56%Jewish5.56%

1.00

LGBTQ content included:

LGB:

lesbian

QTIA+:

cross dressing

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Violence2/5
Sex3/5
Language5/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs2/5

Dove

Sex3/5
Language4/5
Violence2/5
Drugs3/5
Nudity2/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

15%55%

ZR Audience:

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Spirited Away (2001)

Summary: During her family's move to the suburbs, a sullen 10-year-old girl wanders into a world ruled by gods, witches and spirits, and where humans are changed into beasts.

Release Date: March 28, 2003

Genres: Adventure, Family, Animation, Anime

Director: Hayao Miyazaki

Writer: Hayao Miyazaki

Runtime: 2 h 04 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Tokuma Shoten, Studio Ghibli, Nippon Television Network (NTV), Tohokushinsha Film Corporation (TFC), Mitsubishi

Distributor: Walt Disney Home Entertainment, GKIDS

Countries: Japan, United States

Language: Japanese

Movie budget: $ 19,000,000

Domestic: $ 15,205,725

International: $ 342,885,113

Box office:

Budget:$19MDomestic:$15.2MInternational:$342.9MWorldwide:$358.1M

-1%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -1% lower than the critics.

97%96%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

39%88%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

88% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

Asian88.24%Jewish5.88%White5.88%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

strong female lead,strong female character

BechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

97%96%

Animelist:

Douban:

IMDb:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Eating Out (2004)

Summary: After getting dumped by his slutty girlfriend, Caleb falls in love with Gwen. However, thanks to Caleb's roommate, Gwen thinks he's gay and sets him up with her roommate, Marc.

Release Date: February 24, 2012

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Q. Allan Brocka

Writer: Q. Allan Brocka

Runtime: 1 h 30 min

MPAA: Unrated

Production: Ariztical Entertainment

Distributor: Ariztical Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 50,000

Domestic: $ 155,212

Box office:

Budget:$50KDomestic:$155.2KWorldwide:$155.2K

39%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 39% higher than the critics.

19%58%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

50%13%

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

13% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White86.67%Asian6.67%Latino6.67%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

LGB:

gay, homosexual, gay kiss, gay relationship, homosexuality, gay sex, lesbian, bisexual, male male kiss

QTIA+:

queer, first gay sexual experience, queer cinema

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

19%58%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Sorry to Bother You (2018)

Summary: In an alternate present-day version of Oakland, telemarketer Cassius Green discovers a magical key to professional success, propelling him into a universe of greed.

Release Date: July 13, 2018

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Fantasy

Director: Boots Riley

Writer: Boots Riley

Runtime: 1 h 52 min

MPAA: R

Production: Cinereach, MACRO, MNM Creative, Significant Productions, The Space Program

Distributor: Annapurna Distribution, Annapurna Pictures, 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 3,200,000

Domestic: $ 17,493,096

International: $ 677,611

Box office:

Budget:$3.2MDomestic:$17.5MInternational:$677.6KWorldwide:$18.2M

-23%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -23% lower than the critics.

93%70%

The Metacritic audience rated this -9% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

79/100

Metacritic User:

70/100

28%50%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White33.33%Black33.33%Jewish16.67%Mixed / Other11.11%Asian5.56%

0.35

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Role model1/5
Violence4/5
Sex5/5
Language5/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 0.35/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

93%70%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975)

Summary: King Arthur and his Knights of the Round Table embark on a surreal, low-budget search for the Holy Grail, encountering many, very silly obstacles.

Release Date: June 27, 1975

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Fantasy

Directors: Terry Gilliam

, Terry Jones

Writers: Graham Chapman

, John Cleese

, Eric Idle

Runtime: 1 h 31 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Python (Monty) Pictures, Michael White Productions, National Film Trustee Company

Distributor: CBS, Columbia Pictures Home Entertainment, RCA/Columbia Pictures Home Video, A+E Networks, Columbia TriStar Home Video, Comedy Central, Rainbow Releasing, Columbia TriStar Home Entertainment, Sony Video, Sony Pictures Home Entertainment

Country: United Kingdom

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 229,575

Domestic: $ 2,562,392

International: $ 255,104

Box office:

Budget:$229.6KDomestic:$2.6MInternational:$255.1KWorldwide:$2.8M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Adaptation/remake:

based on sketch comedy

-3%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -3% lower than the critics.

98%95%

The Metacritic audience rated this -6% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

91/100

Metacritic User:

85/100

44%0%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White100%

2.00

LGBTQ content included:

gay

Possibly woke elements:

marxism

BechdeltestTalk about a man

Commonsensemedia

Violence3/5
Sex3/5
Language3/5
Drugs1/5

This film gets a 2.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

98%95%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022)

Summary: A middle-aged Chinese immigrant is swept up into an insane adventure in which she alone can save existence by exploring other universes and connecting with the lives she could have led.

Release Date: April 08, 2022

Genres: Action, Adventure, Comedy

Directors: Daniel Kwan

, Daniel Scheinert

Writers: Daniel Kwan

, Daniel Scheinert

Runtime: 2 h 19 min

MPAA: R

Production: A24, IAC Films, AGBO, Year of The Rat, Ley Line Entertainment

Distributor: A24

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 14,300,000

Domestic: $ 77,191,785

International: $ 66,220,886

Box office:

Budget:$14.3MDomestic:$77.2MInternational:$66.2MWorldwide:$143.4M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

-6%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -6% lower than the critics.

95%89%

The Metacritic audience rated this -3% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

81/100

Metacritic User:

78/100

39%59%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

59% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

Asian41.18%White29.41%Black11.76%Jewish11.76%Indian5.88%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

lesbian, lgbt

WorthItOrWokeWoke-ishBechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

95%89%

ZR Audience:

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Mediaversity:

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Puss in Boots: The Last Wish (2022)

Summary: When Puss in Boots discovers that his passion for adventure has taken its toll and he has burned through eight of his nine lives, he launches an epic journey to restore them by finding the mythical Last Wish.

Release Date: December 21, 2022

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Animation

Directors: Joel Crawford

, Januel Mercado

Writers: Tommy Swerdlow

, Tom Wheeler

, Paul Fisher

Runtime: 1 h 42 min

MPAA: PG

Production: DreamWorks Animation, Dentsu

Countries: United States, Japan

Language: English

Franchise: Shrek

Movie budget: $ 90,000,000

Domestic: $ 186,090,535

International: $ 295,667,128

Box office:

Budget:$90MDomestic:$186.1MInternational:$295.7MWorldwide:$481.8M

Possible lazy cash grab:

sequel, sequel to spin off, second part

Franchise:

Shrek

Adaptation/remake:

sequel to spin off

Possible Big Business:

Production:

DreamWorks Animation

15%

The Metacritic audience rated this 15% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

73/100

Metacritic User:

88/100

33%61%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

61% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White38.89%Latino27.78%Black11.11%Mixed / Other11.11%Asian5.56%Arab5.56%

N/A

WorthItOrWokeWoke-ishBechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem (2023)

Summary: The Turtle brothers work to earn the love of New York City while facing down an army of mutants.

Release Date: August 02, 2023

Genres: Action, Adventure, Animation

Directors: Jeff Rowe

, Kyler Spears

Writers: Seth Rogen

, Evan Goldberg

, Jeff Rowe

Runtime: 1 h 39 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Nickelodeon Animation Studios, Point Grey Pictures, Image Comics, Nickelodeon Movies, Paramount Pictures

Distributor: Paramount Pictures

Countries: United States, Japan, Canada

Language: English

Franchise: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles

Movie budget: $ 70,000,000

Domestic: $ 118,613,586

International: $ 63,235,246

Box office:

Budget:$70MDomestic:$118.6MInternational:$63.2MWorldwide:$181.8M

Possible lazy cash grab:

Franchise:

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles

Adaptation/remake:

based on comic book, based on comic

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Paramount Pictures

Nickelodeon Movies

Nickelodeon Animation Studios

-19%

The Metacritic audience rated this -19% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

74/100

Metacritic User:

55/100

22%50%

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White33.33%Black27.78%Jewish16.67%Mixed / Other11.11%Asian5.56%Latino5.56%

N/A

WorthItOrWokeWoke-ishNo MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

Douban:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Nimona (2023)

Summary: When a knight in a futuristic medieval world is framed for a crime he didn't commit, the only one who can help him prove his innocence is Nimona -- a mischievous teen who happens to be a shapeshifting creature he's sworn to destroy.

Release Date: June 30, 2023

Genres: Action, Adventure, Animation

Directors: Nick Bruno

, Troy Quane

Writers: Robert L. Baird

, Lloyd Taylor

, Pamela Ribon

Runtime: 1 h 41 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Annapurna Animation, Annapurna Pictures, Vertigo Entertainment

Countries: United States, United Kingdom, France

Language: English

Adaptation/remake:

based on comic, based on graphic novel

-2%

The Metacritic audience rated this -2% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

75/100

Metacritic User:

73/100

28%39%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White61.11%Black11.11%Asian11.11%Arab5.56%Mixed / Other5.56%Indian5.56%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

gay

BechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

Douban:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Total found: 20

Other sources

Parental Guide: +add

MPAA Certification

No MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?

IMDb Rating

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4457344/parentalguide

last updated: 2024-10-26Update data

Commonsensemedia Rating

https://www.commonsensemedia.org

last updated: 2024-09-27Update data

Methodology

Other sources

boxofficemom.com
commonsensemedia.org
crosswalk.com

Douban

rating: 6.3/10

Kinopoisk

rating: 6.2/10

Eiga

rating: 1.9/5

OFDb

rating: 6.1/10

douban:

Submit your review:

* required

Critic Name

Enter your name or leave the field blank.

Password

Create a password or enter an existing one. ( Please remember your password or you will lose your username forever. Recovery emails are optional and can be added later in User Settings. )

Review Title

Rating*

Rating is just the typical 5 star rating you'd give the film like you'd see on any other review site.

Support*

Support is a boycott suggestion and is meant to be a way for us to consolidate our efforts in “voting with our dollars.” Obviously, Hollywood has proven that they will sacrifice profits for the sake of their agenda, but they’re not as monolithic as you’d think. And people still respond to incentives.

So the 3 options are:

Pay to watch:

This movie is worth your time, and you should support the creators financially so we get more content like it.

Watch it AND give them money.

Watch if free:

The show is entertaining, but you shouldn’t reward the creators for whatever reason. Perhaps you don't want to support preachy celebs who hate their fans. Or maybe you enjoy superhero movies and nostalgia bait, but don't want to encourage Hollywood to continue making them in such a high ratio.

That’s when you’d click the “Watch Now” button and choose from one of the “Free” links:

( Use at your own risk. ZeitgeistReviews does not endorse any of the links and we don’t condone piracy. And we definitely discourage you from using this Reddit thread that shows you all of the places to pirate movies & tv. )

Watch it BUT don’t give them money.

Skip it:

This means the movie wasn’t even worth your time. Maybe it's so full of Woke crap that you’ll want to pull your hair out half way through. Or it could simply just be a piece of s**t, and not in a "so bad it's good" kind of way.

Don’t watch it AND don’t give them money.

( Note: We have expanded our site from just TV & Movies. Now we have games and will add music/books/etc. So the wording might change but the sentiment is still the same for every "Support" section. )

Review text*

Note: Please wrap spoilers [spoiler] like this. [/spoiler]

Neo-Marxism

Neo-Marxism, (sometimes referred to as "Cultural Marxism"), rates the amount of fanatic egalitarianism in a film. Consider this mainly a rating for anti-nationalist and anti-capitalist themes.

Feminism

Strong and multidimensional female characters are fine. This is mainly referring to girlboss crap, unrealistic Mary Sue content, and/or egregious scenes of manhood being disparaged.

Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action rates how much "diversity" is being pushed. ( Not true diversity, but the anti-White checklist kind.)

Gay Stuff

Gay Stuff rates the amount of non-tradional sexuality depicted.

Fedora Tipping

Fedora Tipping rates the amount of atheism / Scientism™ in a film.

Critic Reviews:

Hollywood in Toto #Christian #CenterRight

Aug 22nd 2021

‘Dave Made a Maze’ Shows the Limits of Twee Storytelling

I’m not a sports fan, but I understand what it’s like to root for the losing team.
Sitting at home, watching some hard-working individuals trying to do their best, yet falling short of all expectations, including your own.
In the case of “Dave Made a Maze,” you can’t help but cheer writer-director Bill Watterson (no, not that Bill Watterson!) and his cast and crew as they tackle...

Total found: 1. Show in Search

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

All movie subreddits All TV subreddits All gaming subreddits

Comments:

Your Name:

Password:

Cancel Comment

Dave Made a Maze

Cast

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other Cast, Production

Other cast:

Production:

Representation

Tags / Keywords

Similar Movies

Similar Movies:

Parental Guide

Parental Guide: +add

IMDb Rating

Commonsensemedia Rating

Global Consensus

douban:

Submit your review:

Pay to watch:

Watch if free:

Skip it:

Additional ratings

Critic Reviews:

‘Dave Made a Maze’ Shows the Limits of Twee Storytelling

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

Comments: