Diamond in the Rough

Summary: New college grad Ariana Alvarez (Samantha Boscarino) is given a chance to turn her life around when she joins a stuffy country club.

Release Date: June 29, 2023

Genre: Comedy

Director: Jeannette Godoy

Writers: Grace Church

, Crystal Ferreiro

, James Sommers

Runtime: 1 h 28 min

MPAA: R

Production: CreatorPlus

Distributor: Buffalo 8 Productions, CreatorPlus

Country: United States

Language: English

N/A

The average Rotten Tomatoes audience score is 67%.

67%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

50%28%

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White72.22%Asian5.56%Latino5.56%Indian5.56%Arab5.56%Mixed / Other5.56%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

civil rights

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

67%

IMDb:

Moviemeter:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Cast

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other Cast, Production

Other cast:

Production:

Representation

Star

Supporting

Other

Production

Race	White	Mixed / Other	Arab	Indian	Latino	Black	Asian	Total	Visuals	Info
Kairos	8					1	1	10		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos
Ethnic	2	1		1				4		This is the most reliable data source for accurate ethnic breakdowns of famous people. Often the information is crowdsourced by users and they cite all their sources (family trees, obituaries, census archives, etc.) on the bottom of the page. The only issue is converting their ambiguous and inconsistent verdicts into quantifiable variables. Source: https://ethnicelebs.com/
Forebears			1		1			2
Surname	2							2		A third party free program that uses US Census data to create an algorithm that analyzes surnames and guesses what ethnicity the person is. Obviously there are issues with this data set such as African Americans who have the last names of their ancestors' slave owner. However, when no other data set is available, this can give a rough estimate and expand the data pool for the less important cast members with no IMDb or TMDb image. Please consider downloading their source code via GitHub to verify the accuracy of our data set, and to peer review our conclusions. Source: https://pypi.org/project/ethnicolr/
Bettaface	1							1		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.betafaceapi.com/demo_old.html
Total	13	1	1	1	1	1	1	19
Cast Percentages	68.42%	5.26%	5.26%	5.26%	5.26%	5.26%	5.26%	100%	{"name":"Cast Percentages","series":[{"name":"White","y":68.42,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.26,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":5.26,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":5.26,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":5.26,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":5.26,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":5.26,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}
U.S. Population (2020) Percentage	57.84%	9.32%	0.54%	1.35%	18.73%	12.4%	6%		{"name":"U.S. Population (2020)","series":[{"name":"White","y":57.84,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":0.54,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":6,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":12.4,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Indian","y":1.35,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Indigenous","y":1.12,"color":"#aaeeee"},{"name":"Latino","y":18.73,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":9.32,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Jewish","y":2.02,"color":"#ff0066"}],"prefix":""}	Source: US Census (Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (2020) Representation	+10.58	-4.06	+4.72	+3.91	-13.47	-7.14	-0.74		{"name":"U.S. Population (2020)","series":[["White",57.84],["Mixed \/ Other",9.32],["Arab",0.54],["Indian",1.35],["Latino",18.73],["Black",12.4],["Asian",6]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":68.42,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.26,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Arab","y":5.26,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.26,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.26,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Black","y":5.26,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Asian","y":5.26,"color":"#90ee7e"}]}
U.S. Buying Power (2023) Percentage	72.69%	1.54%			10.06%	8.02%	6.97%		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2023)","series":[{"name":"White","y":13897000000000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":1333100000000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":1533100000000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":136400000000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":1924000000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":295300000000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: Selig Center, University of Georgia
U.S. Buying Power (2023) Representation	-4.27	+3.72			-4.8	-2.76	-1.71		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2023)","series":[["White",72.69],["Mixed \/ Other",1.54],["Arab",0],["Indian",0],["Latino",10.06],["Black",8.02],["Asian",6.97]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":68.42,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.26,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Arab","y":5.26,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.26,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.26,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Black","y":5.26,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Asian","y":5.26,"color":"#90ee7e"}]}
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage	65.34%	7.28%			9.51%	9.43%	7.52%		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":11825174998483,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":1360705388565,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":1706765993728,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":164296821776,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":1721419354421,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":1318328353188,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation	+3.08	-2.02			-4.25	-4.17	-2.26		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[["White",65.34],["Mixed \/ Other",7.28],["Arab",0],["Indian",0],["Latino",9.51],["Black",9.43],["Asian",7.52]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":68.42,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.26,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Arab","y":5.26,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.26,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.26,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Black","y":5.26,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Asian","y":5.26,"color":"#90ee7e"}]}
World population (2019) Percentage	14.24%	1.92%	8.82%	21.91%	5.62%	14.47%	31.25%		{"name":"World population (2019) ","series":[{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":14688882870,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":42991259469,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":10971786583,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":108889096410,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":110601821551,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":238860161621,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":67406299429,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":167470202093,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":2568698093,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (2019) Representation	+54.18	+3.34	-3.56	-16.65	-0.36	-9.21	-25.99		{"name":"World population (2019) ","series":[["White",14.24],["Mixed \/ Other",1.92],["Arab",8.82],["Indian",21.91],["Latino",5.62],["Black",14.47],["Asian",31.25]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":68.42,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.26,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Arab","y":5.26,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.26,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.26,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Black","y":5.26,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Asian","y":5.26,"color":"#90ee7e"}]}
World Buying Power Percentage	36.48%	1.81%	6.38%	6.94%	9.35%	6.38%	29.46%		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[{"name":"White","y":3010602822170000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":771525888400000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":91700962050000,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":526264226360000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":174285727610000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":148984454560000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":526400066100000,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":2431392083750000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":572687873900000,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation	+31.94	+3.45	-1.12	-1.68	-4.09	-1.12	-24.2		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[["White",36.48],["Mixed \/ Other",1.81],["Arab",6.38],["Indian",6.94],["Latino",9.35],["Black",6.38],["Asian",29.46]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":68.42,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.26,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Arab","y":5.26,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.26,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.26,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Black","y":5.26,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Asian","y":5.26,"color":"#90ee7e"}]}
Notes		The "Mixed / Other" categories overlap, and the 2 or more category was not an option until the 2000 Census. So for the combined column, all data will be taken from the "Other" column except for 2000, 2010, & 2020. For those, the average between the "2 or More Races" and "Some Other Race" will be used.	Arab Americans are less than 1% of the US population and often check "White" or "Other" on the US Census. And the only data available for them started when the US Census added ancestry in 1980. So assume a less than 1% margin of error and overlap with the "White" and "Other" categories.		Many Latinos check "White" or "Other" on the Census. So this overlaps with "Mixed" race and "White." Also, when there was a discrepancy with the percentage listed on the Wikipedia table and our calculated numbers, the Wiki table's numbers were used. Likewise, when the population total was missing from the Census pdf, the estimate was calculated using the percentage from the Wiki table. NOTE: It turns out that the reason America doesn't have a separate "Latino" race is because the League of Latin American Citizens protested against discrimination towards Mexicans and got themselves to legally be considered "White." Check the research links in our Google Doc for more info.		The US Census considers Pakistani, Sri Lankan, Indian, and Bangladeshi as Asians. At ZR we group Pakistanis with the Arab world. And we group Sri Lankan and Bangladeshi with India because 1.) they are all genetically similar as "South Asians and 2.) there are only a handful of actors from those regions in our database. However, you are viewing the "Asian Alone" category from the US Census when comparing it with Domestic representation. Also note that the 2000 and 2010 estimates include MultiRacial Asians not just "Asian Alone" estimates, and in some categories they include Native Hawaiians as "Asian." So there is a margin of error less than 1% and some inconsistencies with the grouping.

Tags / Keywords

civil rights george floyd protests reference to benjamin crump reference to george floyd victim

Similar Movies

Similar Movies:

Man Trouble (1992)

Summary: A sleazy but affable guard dog trainer is blackmailed to steal a manuscript for a tell-all book from one of his clients.

Release Date: July 17, 1992

Genres: Comedy, Romance

Director: Bob Rafelson

Writer: Carole Eastman

Runtime: 1 h 40 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Penta Entertainment, American Filmworks, Budding Grove, Penta Pictures, Cecchi Gori Pictures

Distributor: Twentieth Century Fox, 20th Television

Countries: United States, Italy

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 30,000,000

Domestic: $ 4,096,030

Box office:

Budget:$30MDomestic:$4.1MWorldwide:$4.1M

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 7% higher than the critics.

7%14%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

39%6%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White76.47%Jewish17.65%Asian5.88%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

interracial,interracial marriage

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

7%14%

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Mondays in the Sun (2002)

Summary: This is the story of those who live as if every day was a constant Sunday, those who spend their Mondays in the sun. The story of people who worked in a dockyard but are now unemployed.

Release Date: September 27, 2002

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Fernando León de Aranoa

Writers: Fernando León de Aranoa

, Ignacio del Moral

Runtime: 1 h 53 min

MPAA: R

Production: Sogepaq, Elías Querejeta Producciones Cinematográficas, Mediapro, Quo Vadis Cinéma, Eyescreen S.r.l., Televisión de Galicia (TVG) S.A., Vía Digital, Antena 3 Televisión, Eurimages, Continental Producciones, Instituto de la Cinematografía y de las Artes Audiovisuales (ICAA)

Countries: Spain, France, Italy

Language: Spanish

Movie budget: $ 4,000,000

Domestic: $ 153,256

International: $ 9,679,407

Box office:

Budget:$4MDomestic:$153.3KInternational:$9.7MWorldwide:$9.8M

Adaptation/remake:

based on true story

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

22%44%

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White56.25%Latino43.75%

N/A

BechdeltestNo women talkingNo MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Hairspray (1988)

Summary: A 'pleasantly plump' teenager teaches 1962 Baltimore a thing or two about integration after landing a spot on a local TV dance show.

Release Date: February 26, 1988

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Family

Director: John Waters

Writer: John Waters

Runtime: 1 h 32 min

MPAA: G

Production: New Line Cinema, Stanley F. Buchthal, Robert Shaye Production

Distributor: New Line Cinema, Columbia TriStar Domestic Television, Columbia Tristar Television Distribution, Fox Network, Image Entertainment, MGM Worldwide Television, New Line Home Video, RCA/Columbia Pictures Home Video, Sony Pictures Television International, Sony Pictures Television, Turner Home Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 2,000,000

Domestic: $ 6,671,108

International: $ 8,544

Box office:

Budget:$2MDomestic:$6.7MInternational:$8.5KWorldwide:$6.7M

Possible Big Business:

Production:

New Line Cinema

(Warner Bros. Entertainment subsidiary)

-18%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -18% lower than the critics.

98%80%

The Metacritic audience rated this -10% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

77/100

Metacritic User:

67/100

44%11%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White72.22%Jewish16.67%Black11.11%

0.50

Possibly woke elements:

racial segregation,race relations,segregation,class differences,interracial,racism,civil rights,interracial friendship

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message3/5
Violence3/5
Language5/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 0.50/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

98%80%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Hairspray (2007)

Summary: Pleasantly plump teenager Tracy Turnblad teaches 1962 Baltimore a thing or two about integration after landing a spot on a local TV dance show.

Release Date: July 20, 2007

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Musical

Director: Adam Shankman

Writers: Leslie Dixon

, John Waters

, Mark O'Donnell

Runtime: 1 h 57 min

MPAA: PG

Production: New Line Cinema, Ingenious Film Partners, Zadan / Meron Productions

Distributor: American Broadcasting Company (ABC), Netflix, New Line Home Video

Countries: United States, United Kingdom, Canada

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 75,000,000

Domestic: $ 118,946,291

International: $ 84,683,740

Box office:

Budget:$75MDomestic:$118.9MInternational:$84.7MWorldwide:$203.6M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Adaptation/remake:

based on stage musical, remake

Possible Big Business:

Production:

New Line Cinema

(Warner Bros. Entertainment subsidiary)

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

44%18%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

18% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White58.82%Jewish23.53%Black17.65%

1.00

Possibly woke elements:

racial segregation,race relations,segregation,f rated,interracial,racism,civil rights,interracial friendship

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message3/5
Role model3/5
Language3/5
Drugs3/5

Dove

Sex3/5
Language2/5
Violence1/5
Drugs2/5
Nudity2/5
Other1/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

3 Blind Saints (2011)

Summary: To avoid time in jail, three wily men agree to be ministers at a local church. While bungling through their duties, they uncover a greedy plot to steal from the church.

Genre: Comedy

Director: John Eschenbaum

Writer: Steve Gray

Runtime: 1 h 29 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Attaboy Media Productions, Higher Purpose Entertainment

Distributor: FilmWorks Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

33%38%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

38% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White62.5%Black25%Asian12.5%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

Eiga:

IMDb:

Methodology

Big Bully (1996)

Summary: A writer returns to his hometown where he faces the childhood nemesis whose life he ultimately ruined, only the bully wants to relive their painful past by torturing him once again.

Release Date: January 26, 1996

Genres: Comedy, Thriller

Director: Steve Miner

Writer: Mark Steven Johnson

Runtime: 1 h 30 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Morgan Creek Entertainment, Lee Rich Productions

Distributor: Warner Bros., American Broadcasting Company (ABC), Mill Creek Entertainment, Relativity Media, Uv Rml Films, Warner Home Video

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 15,000,000

Domestic: $ 2,042,530

Box office:

Budget:$15MDomestic:$2MWorldwide:$2M

N/A

The average Rotten Tomatoes audience score is 21%.

21%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

22%6%

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White64.71%Jewish29.41%Black5.88%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

21%

IMDb:

OFDb:

Methodology

The Swan (1925)

Summary: A man is employed to tutor the children of an aristocratic family and has an affair with the daughter of the house.

Release Date: February 16, 1925

Genres: Comedy, Romance

Director: Dimitri Buchowetzki

Writers: Melville Baker

, Dimitri Buchowetzki

, Lenore J. Coffee

Runtime: 1 h 25 min

Production: Famous Players-Lasky Corporation

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 174,429

Box office:

Domestic:$174.4KWorldwide:$174.4K

Adaptation/remake:

based on play

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

36%0%

36% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White92.86%Jewish7.14%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

IMDb:

Methodology

Hugo Pool (1997)

Summary: An LA pool cleaner/Alyssa Milano falls in love with a young man with ALS/Lou Gehrig's Disease.

Release Date: December 12, 1997

Genres: Comedy, Romance

Director: Robert Downey Sr.

Writers: Robert Downey Sr.

, Laura Ernst

Runtime: 1 h 32 min

MPAA: R

Production: BMG Independents, Nomadic Pictures

Distributor: Northern Arts Entertainment, Image Entertainment, Fox Lorber

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 13,330

Box office:

Domestic:$13.3KWorldwide:$13.3K

16%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 16% higher than the critics.

29%45%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

22%11%

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White66.67%Jewish22.22%Latino11.11%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

gay, gay kiss

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

29%45%

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Seed of Chucky (2004)

Summary: Chucky and Tiffany are resurrected by their innocent gender-confused child, Glen/Glenda, and hit Hollywood, where a movie depicting the killer dolls' murder spree is underway.

Release Date: November 12, 2004

Genres: Comedy, Fantasy, Horror

Director: Don Mancini

Writer: Don Mancini

Runtime: 1 h 27 min

MPAA: R

Production: Rogue Pictures, David Kirschner Productions, Castel Film Romania

Distributor: Scream Factory, Shout! Factory, Universal Pictures Home Entertainment (UPHE)

Countries: United States, United Kingdom, Romania

Language: English

Franchise: Child's Play

Movie budget: $ 12,000,000

Domestic: $ 17,083,732

International: $ 7,745,912

Box office:

Budget:$12MDomestic:$17.1MInternational:$7.7MWorldwide:$24.8M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Possible lazy cash grab:

sequel, fifth part

Franchise:

Child's Play

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 9% higher than the critics.

34%43%

The Metacritic audience rated this -10% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

46/100

Metacritic User:

36/100

33%18%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

18% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White82.35%Latino5.88%Black5.88%Mixed / Other5.88%

1.00

Possibly woke elements:

interracial

BechdeltestPassed!

Dove

Sex4/5
Language5/5
Violence5/5
Nudity4/5
Other4/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

34%43%

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Everything Is Illuminated (2005)

Summary: A young Jewish American man, with the help of an eccentric local, endeavors to find the woman who saved his grandfather during World War II in a Ukrainian village that was ultimately razed by the Nazis.

Release Date: November 04, 2005

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Liev Schreiber

Writers: Jonathan Safran Foer

, Liev Schreiber

Runtime: 1 h 46 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Warner Independent Pictures (WIP), Telegraph Films, Big Beach Films, Stillking Films

Distributor: Warner Independent Pictures (WIP), Warner Home Video

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 7,000,000

Domestic: $ 1,712,337

International: $ 1,889,637

Box office:

Budget:$7MDomestic:$1.7MInternational:$1.9MWorldwide:$3.6M

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel

23%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 23% higher than the critics.

66%89%

The Metacritic audience rated this 19% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

58/100

Metacritic User:

77/100

28%12%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

12% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White82.35%Asian11.76%Jewish5.88%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

homosexual, lesbian

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

66%89%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Ladrón que roba a ladrón (2007)

Summary: Two former thieves reunite to rob the biggest thief they know -- Moctesuma Valdez, a TV infomercial guru who's made millions selling worthless health products to poor Latino immigrants. When none of their affiliates want to go und...

Release Date: August 31, 2007

Genres: Action, Adventure, Comedy

Director: Joe Menendez

Writer: JoJo Henrickson

Runtime: 1 h 38 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Narrow Bridge Films, Panamax Films

Distributor: Lionsgate, Univisión Network

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 1,200,000

Domestic: $ 4,011,254

International: $ 2,863,835

Box office:

Budget:$1.2MDomestic:$4MInternational:$2.9MWorldwide:$6.9M

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

28%63%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

63% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

Latino62.5%White37.5%

2.00

Commonsensemedia

Violence3/5
Sex2/5
Language3/5
Consumerism3/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 2.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Stonewall (1995)

Summary: A group of homosexual people try to live with dignity and self-respect while events build to the opening battle in the major gay rights movement.

Release Date: September 03, 1996

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Nigel Finch

Writers: Rikki Beadle Blair

, Martin Duberman

Runtime: 1 h 39 min

MPAA: R

Production: British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), BBC Arena, Killer Films

Distributor: Strand Releasing

Countries: United Kingdom, United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 692,400

Box office:

Domestic:$692.4KWorldwide:$692.4K

Adaptation/remake:

based on true story, based on novel

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 5% higher than the critics.

63%68%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

11%50%

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White50%Black22.22%Latino22.22%Mixed / Other5.56%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

LGB:

gay, homosexual, gay kiss, gay character, gay relationship, homosexuality, gay sex, gay couple, lesbian, male male kiss, gay bar, boyfriend boyfriend relationship

QTIA+:

transgender, queer, transgender interest, sex change, queer cinema

Possibly woke elements:

race relations, interracial, interracial relationship, civil rights

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

63%68%

Douban:

IMDb:

OFDb:

Methodology

Chi-Raq (2015)

Summary: A modern day adaptation of the ancient Greek play Lysistrata by Aristophanes, set against the backdrop of gang violence in Chicago, Illinois.

Release Date: December 02, 2016

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Crime

Director: Spike Lee

Writers: Kevin Willmott

, Spike Lee

, Aristophanes

Runtime: 2 h 07 min

MPAA: R

Production: 40 Acres & A Mule Filmworks, Amazon Studios

Distributor: Amazon Studios

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 2,653,032

International: $ 66,667

Box office:

Domestic:$2.7MInternational:$66.7KWorldwide:$2.7M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

-32%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -32% lower than the critics.

82%50%

The Metacritic audience rated this -24% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

77/100

Metacritic User:

53/100

44%72%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

72% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

Black61.11%White27.78%Asian5.56%Mixed / Other5.56%

0.50

Possibly woke elements:

racism,civil rights

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message3/5
Role model2/5
Violence4/5
Sex5/5
Language5/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs4/5

This film gets a 0.50/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

82%50%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Carnage (2011)

Summary: Two pairs of parents hold a cordial meeting after their sons are involved in a fight, though as their time together progresses, increasingly childish behavior throws the discussion into chaos.

Release Date: November 18, 2011

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Roman Polanski

Writers: Yasmina Reza

, Michael Katims

, Roman Polanski

Runtime: 1 h 20 min

MPAA: R

Production: SBS Productions, Constantin Film, SPI Film Studio, Versátil Cinema, Zanagar Films, France 2 Cinéma, Canal+, CinéCinéma, France Télévisions, Polski Instytut Sztuki Filmowej, Wild Bunch

Distributor: SBS Productions, Sony Pictures Classics, Sony Pictures Home Entertainment

Countries: France, Germany, Poland, Spain

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 25,000,000

Domestic: $ 2,547,047

International: $ 27,488,554

Box office:

Budget:$25MDomestic:$2.5MInternational:$27.5MWorldwide:$30M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Adaptation/remake:

foreign language adaptation, based on play

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Constantin Film

-4%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -4% lower than the critics.

70%66%

The Metacritic audience rated this 11% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

61/100

Metacritic User:

72/100

45%0%

45% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White100%

1.00

LGBTQ content included:

gay

Possibly woke elements:

ku klux klan

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Violence1/5
Language4/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

70%66%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Pain & Gain (2013)

Summary: A trio of bodybuilders in Florida get caught up in an extortion ring and a kidnapping scheme that goes terribly wrong.

Release Date: April 26, 2013

Genres: Action, Comedy, Crime

Director: Michael Bay

Writers: Christopher Markus

, Stephen McFeely

, Pete Collins

Runtime: 2 h 09 min

MPAA: R

Production: Paramount Pictures, De Line Pictures, Phoenix International

Distributor: Paramount Pictures, Paramount Home Entertainment, Warner Home Video

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 26,000,000

Domestic: $ 49,875,291

International: $ 37,430,258

Box office:

Budget:$26MDomestic:$49.9MInternational:$37.4MWorldwide:$87.3M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Adaptation/remake:

based on true story, based on article

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Paramount Pictures

-3%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -3% lower than the critics.

50%47%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

33%33%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White61.11%Latino11.11%Asian5.56%Jewish5.56%Arab5.56%Black5.56%Mixed / Other5.56%

0.10

LGBTQ content included:

gay

Possibly woke elements:

interracial, interracial marriage, interracial relationship, interracial friendship

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Violence4/5
Sex5/5
Language5/5
Consumerism2/5
Drugs4/5

This film gets a 0.10/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

50%47%

ZR Audience:

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Creepshow (1982)

Summary: Five grisly tales from a kid's comic book about a murdered father rising from his grave, a bizarre meteor, a vengeful husband, a mysterious crate's occupant, and a plague of cockroaches.

Release Date: November 10, 1982

Genres: Comedy, Fantasy, Horror

Director: George A. Romero

Writer: Stephen King

Runtime: 2 h 00 min

MPAA: R

Production: United Film Distribution Company (UFDC), Laurel-Show Inc., United Film Distribution Company, Warner Bros.

Distributor: Warner Home Video, Scream Factory, HBO Max

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 8,000,000

Domestic: $ 21,028,755

International: $ 2,557

Box office:

Budget:$8MDomestic:$21MInternational:$2.6KWorldwide:$21M

Adaptation/remake:

based on comic book, based on comic, based on the works of stephen king

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Warner Bros.

-6%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -6% lower than the critics.

74%68%

The Metacritic audience rated this 24% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

59/100

Metacritic User:

83/100

28%11%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White83.33%Latino5.56%Jewish5.56%Mixed / Other5.56%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

74%68%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon (2006)

Summary: The next great killer and psychopath has given a documentary film crew exclusive access to his life as he plans his reign of terror over the quiet town of Glen Echo.

Release Date: October 13, 2006

Genres: Comedy, Thriller, Horror

Director: Scott Glosserman

Writers: Scott Glosserman

, David J. Stieve

Runtime: 1 h 32 min

MPAA: R

Production: Glen Echo Entertainment, Code Entertainment

Distributor: Anchor Bay Entertainment, GathrFilms, Starz, Scream Factory

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 69,136

Box office:

Domestic:$69.1KWorldwide:$69.1K

-1%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -1% lower than the critics.

76%75%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

44%12%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

12% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White82.35%Latino11.76%Jewish5.88%

0.10

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Violence5/5
Sex3/5
Language5/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 0.10/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

76%75%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Crazy in Alabama (1999)

Summary: An abused wife heads to California to become a movie star while her nephew back in Alabama has to deal with a racially-motivated murder involving a corrupt sheriff.

Release Date: October 22, 1999

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Crime

Director: Antonio Banderas

Writer: Mark Childress

Runtime: 1 h 51 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Columbia Pictures, Green Moon Productions, Global Entertainment Productions GmbH & Company Medien KG

Distributor: Columbia TriStar Home Entertainment, Mill Creek Entertainment

Countries: Germany, United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 15,000,000

Domestic: $ 2,005,840

Box office:

Budget:$15MDomestic:$2MWorldwide:$2M

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Columbia Pictures

34%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 34% higher than the critics.

30%64%

The Metacritic audience rated this 28% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

45/100

Metacritic User:

73/100

33%6%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White72.22%Jewish22.22%Black5.56%

2.00

Possibly woke elements:

sexism,race relations,discrimination,segregation,social injustice,racism,civil rights,injustice

Dove

Sex2/5
Language4/5
Violence2/5
Drugs1/5

This film gets a 2.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

30%64%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Blaze (1989)

Summary: A middle-aged Louisiana governor falls in love with a young stripper, which jeopardizes his political career and the radical policies which have made him a controversial figure.

Release Date: December 13, 1989

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Biography

Director: Ron Shelton

Writers: Blaze Starr

, Huey Perry

, Ron Shelton

Runtime: 2 h 00 min

MPAA: R

Production: Touchstone Pictures, Silver Screen Partners IV, A&M Films

Distributor: Buena Vista Pictures, American Broadcasting Company (ABC), Walt Disney Home Video, Mill Creek Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 22,000,000

Domestic: $ 19,131,246

Box office:

Budget:$22MDomestic:$19.1MWorldwide:$19.1M

Adaptation/remake:

based on true story, based on book, based on autobiography

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

22%17%

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White72.22%Black11.11%Jewish11.11%Latino5.56%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

social injustice,civil rights,injustice

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

The 'Burbs (1989)

Summary: An overstressed suburbanite and his neighbors are convinced that the new family on the block is part of a murderous Satanic cult.

Release Date: February 17, 1989

Genres: Comedy, Thriller, Mystery

Director: Joe Dante

Writer: Dana Olsen

Runtime: 1 h 42 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Imagine Entertainment

Distributor: CBS, MCA/Universal Home Video, Paramount Pictures, Shout Select, Shout! Factory, Trifecta Entertainment and Media, Universal Pictures Home Entertainment (UPHE), Viacom

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 18,000,000

Domestic: $ 36,601,993

International: $ 12,500,000

Box office:

Budget:$18MDomestic:$36.6MInternational:$12.5MWorldwide:$49.1M

18%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 18% higher than the critics.

53%71%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

17%6%

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White72.22%Jewish22.22%Black5.56%

1.15

WorthItOrWokeNon-WokeBechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Role model1/5
Violence3/5
Sex1/5
Language3/5
Consumerism2/5
Drugs2/5

This film gets a 1.15/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

53%71%

ZR Audience:

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Methodology

Other sources

Parental Guide

Parental Guide: +add

MPAA Certification

No MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?

IMDb Rating

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt16152556/parentalguide

last updated: 2024-10-26Update data

Commonsensemedia Rating

https://www.commonsensemedia.org

last updated: 2024-09-27Update data

Methodology

Other sources

boxofficemom.com
commonsensemedia.org
crosswalk.com

Global Consensus

MovieMeter

rating: 1.6/5

douban:

Submit your review:

* required

Critic Name

Enter your name or leave the field blank.

Password

Create a password or enter an existing one. ( Please remember your password or you will lose your username forever. Recovery emails are optional and can be added later in User Settings. )

Review Title

Rating*

Rating is just the typical 5 star rating you'd give the film like you'd see on any other review site.

Support*

Support is a boycott suggestion and is meant to be a way for us to consolidate our efforts in “voting with our dollars.” Obviously, Hollywood has proven that they will sacrifice profits for the sake of their agenda, but they’re not as monolithic as you’d think. And people still respond to incentives.

So the 3 options are:

Pay to watch:

This movie is worth your time, and you should support the creators financially so we get more content like it.

Watch it AND give them money.

Watch if free:

The show is entertaining, but you shouldn’t reward the creators for whatever reason. Perhaps you don't want to support preachy celebs who hate their fans. Or maybe you enjoy superhero movies and nostalgia bait, but don't want to encourage Hollywood to continue making them in such a high ratio.

That’s when you’d click the “Watch Now” button and choose from one of the “Free” links:

( Use at your own risk. ZeitgeistReviews does not endorse any of the links and we don’t condone piracy. And we definitely discourage you from using this Reddit thread that shows you all of the places to pirate movies & tv. )

Watch it BUT don’t give them money.

Skip it:

This means the movie wasn’t even worth your time. Maybe it's so full of Woke crap that you’ll want to pull your hair out half way through. Or it could simply just be a piece of s**t, and not in a "so bad it's good" kind of way.

Don’t watch it AND don’t give them money.

( Note: We have expanded our site from just TV & Movies. Now we have games and will add music/books/etc. So the wording might change but the sentiment is still the same for every "Support" section. )

Review text*

Note: Please wrap spoilers [spoiler] like this. [/spoiler]

Neo-Marxism

Neo-Marxism, (sometimes referred to as "Cultural Marxism"), rates the amount of fanatic egalitarianism in a film. Consider this mainly a rating for anti-nationalist and anti-capitalist themes.

Feminism

Strong and multidimensional female characters are fine. This is mainly referring to girlboss crap, unrealistic Mary Sue content, and/or egregious scenes of manhood being disparaged.

Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action rates how much "diversity" is being pushed. ( Not true diversity, but the anti-White checklist kind.)

Gay Stuff

Gay Stuff rates the amount of non-tradional sexuality depicted.

Fedora Tipping

Fedora Tipping rates the amount of atheism / Scientism™ in a film.

Audience Reviews:

No results found

Critic Reviews:

Submit a review link

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

All movie subreddits All TV subreddits All gaming subreddits

Comments:

Your Name:

Password:

Cancel Comment

Diamond in the Rough

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

Similar Movies:

Parental Guide: +add

IMDb Rating

Commonsensemedia Rating

douban:

Submit your review:

Pay to watch:

Watch if free:

Skip it:

Additional ratings

Audience Reviews:

Critic Reviews:

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

Comments: