Gayby

Summary: Jenn (straight) and Matt (gay) are best friends from college who are now in their thirties. Single by choice, they decide to fulfill a youthful promise to have a child together--the old-fashioned way.

Release Date: March 12, 2012

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Jonathan Lisecki

Writer: Jonathan Lisecki

Runtime: 1 h 25 min

MPAA: Not Rated

Production: Hubbhobb

Distributor: Wolfe Releasing

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 14,062

Box office:

Domestic:$14.1KWorldwide:$14.1K

-15%

The Metacritic audience rated this -15% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

58/100

Metacritic User:

43/100

28%31%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

31% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White68.75%Black12.5%Mixed / Other12.5%Latino6.25%

N/A

BechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

Douban:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

Methodology

Cast

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other Cast, Production

Other cast:

Production:

Representation

Star

Supporting

Other

Production

Race	White	Latino	Asian	Mixed / Other	Indian	Jewish	Total	Visuals	Info
Kairos	5	2	2				9		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos
Ethnic	5					1	6		This is the most reliable data source for accurate ethnic breakdowns of famous people. Often the information is crowdsourced by users and they cite all their sources (family trees, obituaries, census archives, etc.) on the bottom of the page. The only issue is converting their ambiguous and inconsistent verdicts into quantifiable variables. Source: https://ethnicelebs.com/
Crowd				1			1		This is the crowdsourced dataset created by users like you! We greatly appreciate your cooperation in making ZR the most accurate and massive database on the internet. Sometimes the verdicts are submitted by looks alone, sometimes users attach an image and a source link. Due to this inconsistency please take the results with a grain of salt and click each actor for more info.
Bettaface	1						1		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.betafaceapi.com/demo_old.html
Forebears					1		1
Total	11	2	2	1	1	1	18
Cast Percentages	61.11%	11.11%	11.11%	5.56%	5.56%	5.56%	100%	{"name":"Cast Percentages","series":[{"name":"White","y":61.11,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":11.11,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.56,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}
U.S. Population (2020) Percentage	57.84%	18.73%	6%	9.32%	1.35%	2.02%		{"name":"U.S. Population (2020)","series":[{"name":"White","y":57.84,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":0.54,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":6,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":12.4,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Indian","y":1.35,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Indigenous","y":1.12,"color":"#aaeeee"},{"name":"Latino","y":18.73,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":9.32,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Jewish","y":2.02,"color":"#ff0066"}],"prefix":""}	Source: US Census (Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (2020) Representation	+3.27	-7.62	+5.11	-3.76	+4.21	+3.54		{"name":"U.S. Population (2020)","series":[["White",57.84],["Latino",18.73],["Asian",6],["Mixed \/ Other",9.32],["Indian",1.35],["Jewish",2.02]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":61.11,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Latino","y":11.11,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.56,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"}]}
U.S. Buying Power (2018) Percentage	74.35%	9.42%	6.2%	1.38%				{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":12147700000000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":1013300000000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":1300200000000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":114600000000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":1539000000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":224700000000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: Selig Center, University of Georgia
U.S. Buying Power (2018) Representation	-13.24	+1.69	+4.91	+4.18				{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2018)","series":[["White",74.35],["Latino",9.42],["Asian",6.2],["Mixed \/ Other",1.38],["Indian",0],["Jewish",0]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":61.11,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Latino","y":11.11,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.56,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"}]}
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage	65.34%	9.51%	7.52%	7.28%				{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":11769261769072,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":1354271535995,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":1698695855352,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":163519973579,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":1713279930244,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":1312094872866,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation	-4.23	+1.6	+3.59	-1.72				{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[["White",65.34],["Latino",9.51],["Asian",7.52],["Mixed \/ Other",7.28],["Indian",0],["Jewish",0]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":61.11,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Latino","y":11.11,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.56,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"}]}
World population (2018) Percentage	14.35%	5.63%	31.41%	1.92%	21.9%	0.34%		{"name":"World population (2018) ","series":[{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":14483756233,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":42590173754,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":10835693854,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":108509349246,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":107958087124,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":237538960033,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":66200811292,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":165634702327,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":2542571687,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (2018) Representation	+46.76	+5.48	-20.3	+3.64	-16.34	+5.22		{"name":"World population (2018) ","series":[["White",14.35],["Latino",5.63],["Asian",31.41],["Mixed \/ Other",1.92],["Indian",21.9],["Jewish",0.34]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":61.11,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Latino","y":11.11,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.56,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"}]}
World Buying Power Percentage	36.48%	9.35%	29.46%	1.81%	6.94%	1.11%		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[{"name":"White","y":3010602822170000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":771525888400000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":91700962050000,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":526264226360000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":174285727610000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":148984454560000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":526400066100000,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":2431392083750000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":572687873900000,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation	+24.63	+1.76	-18.35	+3.75	-1.38	+4.45		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[["White",36.48],["Latino",9.35],["Asian",29.46],["Mixed \/ Other",1.81],["Indian",6.94],["Jewish",1.11]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":61.11,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Latino","y":11.11,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.56,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"}]}
Notes		Many Latinos check "White" or "Other" on the Census. So this overlaps with "Mixed" race and "White." Also, when there was a discrepancy with the percentage listed on the Wikipedia table and our calculated numbers, the Wiki table's numbers were used. Likewise, when the population total was missing from the Census pdf, the estimate was calculated using the percentage from the Wiki table. NOTE: It turns out that the reason America doesn't have a separate "Latino" race is because the League of Latin American Citizens protested against discrimination towards Mexicans and got themselves to legally be considered "White." Check the research links in our Google Doc for more info.	The US Census considers Pakistani, Sri Lankan, Indian, and Bangladeshi as Asians. At ZR we group Pakistanis with the Arab world. And we group Sri Lankan and Bangladeshi with India because 1.) they are all genetically similar as "South Asians and 2.) there are only a handful of actors from those regions in our database. However, you are viewing the "Asian Alone" category from the US Census when comparing it with Domestic representation. Also note that the 2000 and 2010 estimates include MultiRacial Asians not just "Asian Alone" estimates, and in some categories they include Native Hawaiians as "Asian." So there is a margin of error less than 1% and some inconsistencies with the grouping.	The "Mixed / Other" categories overlap, and the 2 or more category was not an option until the 2000 Census. So for the combined column, all data will be taken from the "Other" column except for 2000, 2010, & 2020. For those, the average between the "2 or More Races" and "Some Other Race" will be used.		If there were any inconsistencies with percentages calculated using our Census data, the Jewish Data Bank percentages were the ones used. Also please review the Jewish Data Bank pdf to understand the difference between the "Core" Jewish population and the "Extended" / "Law of Return" Jewish populations. We are displaying the "Core" Jewish populations since that is what the Jewish Data Bank and Wikipedia articles chose. Also, the 1942 population estimates were used for the 1940 row. For the 2000 estimates, the "Core" definition was not used, so we used the 5.2 mil broader estimate instead of the 4.3 mil estimate since the 5.2 broader estimate seemed too drastic of a drop and the definitions weren't congruent with Core and Law of Return.

Tags / Keywords

bikram yoga male wears underwear man wrapped in a towel prissiness wanting to have a child

Similar Movies

Similar Movies:

The Next Best Thing (2000)

Summary: Abbie, tired of failed relationships, has a one-night-stand with her gay friend; they agree to raise the resulting baby together.

Release Date: March 03, 2000

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: John Schlesinger

Writer: Tom Ropelewski

Runtime: 1 h 48 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Lakeshore Entertainment, Paramount Pictures

Distributor: Paramount Pictures

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 25,000,000

Domestic: $ 14,990,582

International: $ 9,372,190

Box office:

Budget:$25MDomestic:$15MInternational:$9.4MWorldwide:$24.4M

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Paramount Pictures

16%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 16% higher than the critics.

19%35%

The Metacritic audience rated this 52% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

25/100

Metacritic User:

77/100

44%13%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

13% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White73.33%Jewish13.33%Black6.67%Mixed / Other6.67%

1.00

LGBTQ content included:

gay son, Gay, homosexual, gay character, homosexuality, Gay sex, gay man, gay parent

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

Commonsensemedia

Message1/5
Role model2/5
Violence2/5
Sex3/5
Language3/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

19%35%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Private Romeo (2011)

Summary: A modern take on Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet'. Set at an isolated all-boys military academy, it follows the forbidden relationship between two cadets.

Release Date: June 20, 2011

Genres: Drama, Romance

Director: Alan Brown

Writers: Alan Brown

, William Shakespeare

Runtime: 1 h 34 min

MPAA: Not Rated

Country: United States

Language: English

Adaptation/remake:

shakespeare adaptation, based on play

10%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 10% higher than the critics.

55%65%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

0%29%

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

29% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White57.14%Asian14.29%Latino14.29%Jewish14.29%

1.00

LGBTQ content included:

LGB:

gay, homosexual, gay kiss, gay romance, male male kiss, gay love

QTIA+:

gay teenager, first gay sexual experience

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Violence2/5
Sex3/5
Language3/5
Drugs2/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

55%65%

Douban:

IMDb:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

A Woman Is a Woman (1961)

Summary: A stripper who's desperate to become a mother accepts her reluctant boyfriend's suggestion that she be impregnated by his best friend.

Release Date: September 06, 1961

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Jean-Luc Godard

Writers: Geneviève Cluny

, Jean-Luc Godard

Runtime: 1 h 24 min

MPAA: Not Rated

Production: Euro International Films, Rome Paris Films, World Wonder Ring Stardom

Distributor: Pathé Contemporary Films, Rialto Pictures, The Criterion Collection, HBO Max, The Criterion Channel

Countries: France, Italy

Language: French

Movie budget: $ 160,000

Domestic: $ 100,665

International: $ 1,082

Box office:

Budget:$160KDomestic:$100.7KInternational:$1.1KWorldwide:$101.7K

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

64%0%

64% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White100%

N/A

BechdeltestNo 2 womenNo MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Charlie Bartlett (2007)

Summary: A rich kid becomes the self-appointed psychiatrist to the student body of his new high school.

Release Date: February 22, 2008

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Jon Poll

Writer: Gustin Nash

Runtime: 1 h 37 min

MPAA: R

Production: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM), Sidney Kimmel Entertainment, Everyman Pictures, Texon Entertainment, Permut Presentations, Granite Rock Films, Madacy Entertainment

Distributor: Metro Goldwyn Distributing Company, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM), 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, MGM Home Entertainment

Countries: Canada, United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 12,000,000

Domestic: $ 3,951,699

International: $ 1,303,287

Box office:

Budget:$12MDomestic:$4MInternational:$1.3MWorldwide:$5.3M

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM)

13%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 13% higher than the critics.

58%71%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

28%18%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

18% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White58.82%Jewish23.53%Mixed / Other11.76%Asian5.88%

0.10

Possibly woke elements:

class differences

BechdeltestTalk about a man

Commonsensemedia

Violence3/5
Sex3/5
Language3/5
Drugs5/5

Dove

Sex3/5
Language5/5
Violence2/5
Drugs5/5
Nudity2/5
Other1/5

This film gets a 0.10/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

58%71%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

The Wood (1999)

Summary: While dealing with a friend's cold feet on his wedding day, a writer reminisces about his youth with his best friends.

Release Date: July 16, 1999

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Rick Famuyiwa

Writers: Rick Famuyiwa

, Todd Boyd

Runtime: 1 h 46 min

MPAA: R

Production: Bona Fide Productions, MTV Films

Distributor: Paramount Pictures, United Paramount Network (UPN), HBO Max

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 6,000,000

Domestic: $ 25,059,640

Box office:

Budget:$6MDomestic:$25.1MWorldwide:$25.1M

Possible Big Business:

Production:

MTV Films

31%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 31% higher than the critics.

61%92%

The Metacritic audience rated this 27% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

52/100

Metacritic User:

79/100

33%75%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

75% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

Black75%White25%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

61%92%

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Don Jon (2013)

Summary: A New Jersey guy dedicated to his family, friends, and church, develops unrealistic expectations from watching porn and works to find happiness and intimacy with his potential true love.

Release Date: September 27, 2013

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Joseph Gordon-Levitt

Writer: Joseph Gordon-Levitt

Runtime: 1 h 30 min

MPAA: 18A

Production: Voltage Pictures, hitRECord, HitRecord Films, Ram Bergman Productions

Distributor: Relativity Media, 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 3,000,000

Domestic: $ 24,477,704

International: $ 14,961,651

Box office:

Budget:$3MDomestic:$24.5MInternational:$15MWorldwide:$39.4M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

-22%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -22% lower than the critics.

80%58%

The Metacritic audience rated this 3% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

66/100

Metacritic User:

69/100

61%18%

61% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

18% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White52.94%Jewish29.41%Indian5.88%Latino5.88%Black5.88%

0.84

LGBTQ content included:

gay

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Role model1/5
Violence2/5
Sex5/5
Language5/5
Consumerism3/5
Drugs3/5

Dove

Sex4/5
Language5/5
Violence2/5
Drugs3/5
Nudity4/5
Other3/5

This film gets a 0.84/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

80%58%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Goodbye, Columbus (1969)

Summary: An intelligent graduate and working-class Army veteran has an affair and clashes with a 'nouveau riche' young woman who cares not for birth control or the use of any other precautions to avoid pregnancy.

Release Date: May 21, 1969

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Larry Peerce

Writers: Philip Roth

, Arnold Schulman

Runtime: 1 h 42 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Willow Tree

Distributor: Paramount Pictures, American Broadcasting Company (ABC), Warner Archive Collection

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 22,939,805

Box office:

Domestic:$22.9MWorldwide:$22.9M

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel, based on novella

-43%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -43% lower than the critics.

92%49%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

39%13%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

13% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White75%Jewish12.5%Black6.25%Latino6.25%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

race relations,class differences

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

92%49%

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

It Could Happen to You (1994)

Summary: A police officer promises to share his lottery ticket with a waitress in lieu of a tip.

Release Date: July 29, 1994

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Andrew Bergman

Writer: Jane Anderson

Runtime: 1 h 41 min

MPAA: PG

Production: TriStar Pictures

Distributor: Columbia TriStar Home Video, CBS, Sony Pictures Home Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 20,000,000

Domestic: $ 37,939,757

Box office:

Budget:$20MDomestic:$37.9MWorldwide:$37.9M

Adaptation/remake:

based on true story

Possible Big Business:

Production:

TriStar Pictures

-17%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -17% lower than the critics.

71%54%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

28%41%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

41% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White47.06%Black17.65%Latino17.65%Jewish11.76%Asian5.88%

N/A

BechdeltestNo women talkingNo MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

71%54%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

A Summer's Tale (1996)

Summary: As a reserved young graduate vacations in a seaside town, he hopes his girlfriend will join him. But he ends up bonding with a local young woman whose female friend is also smitten with him.

Release Date: June 20, 2014

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Éric Rohmer

Writer: Éric Rohmer

Runtime: 1 h 53 min

MPAA: G

Production: Canal+, La Sept Cinéma, Les Films du Losange, Sofilmka

Distributor: Big World Pictures

Country: France

Language: French

Domestic: $ 198,126

International: $ 580

Box office:

Domestic:$198.1KInternational:$580Worldwide:$198.7K

-16%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -16% lower than the critics.

98%82%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

44%0%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White100%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

98%82%

Douban:

IMDb:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Tadpole (2002)

Summary: Coming-of-age story about a suave 15-year-old prep school student who falls in love with his stepmother. When her best friend responds to his advances, he suddenly finds himself in way over his head.

Release Date: August 23, 2002

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Gary Winick

Writers: Heather McGowan

, Niels Mueller

, Gary Winick

Runtime: 1 h 18 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Miramax, InDigEnt (Independent Digital Entertainment), Dolly Hall Productions

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 150,000

Domestic: $ 2,891,288

International: $ 308,953

Box office:

Budget:$150KDomestic:$2.9MInternational:$309KWorldwide:$3.2M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Production:

Miramax

(Paramount Global subsidiary)

-20%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -20% lower than the critics.

77%57%

The average Metacritic score is 71%.

Metacritic Meta:

71/100

44%6%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White88.24%Black5.88%Jewish5.88%

1.00

BechdeltestTalk about a man

Commonsensemedia

Sex4/5
Language3/5
Drugs3/5

Dove

Sex4/5
Language4/5
Drugs3/5
Nudity2/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

77%57%

Douban:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

OFDb:

Methodology

Whatever It Takes (2000)

Summary: A modern-day remake of the Cyrano DeBergerac tale.

Release Date: March 24, 2000

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: David Raynr

Writer: Mark Schwahn

Runtime: 1 h 34 min

MPAA: Not Rated

Production: Columbia Pictures, Phoenix Pictures, I'll Be You Productions

Distributor: Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE), Columbia Pictures, Sony Pictures Releasing, Columbia TriStar Home Video

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 32,000,000

Domestic: $ 8,745,680

International: $ 1,156,435

Box office:

Budget:$32MDomestic:$8.7MInternational:$1.2MWorldwide:$9.9M

Adaptation/remake:

modern day adaptation

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Columbia Pictures

29%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 29% higher than the critics.

16%45%

The Metacritic audience rated this 31% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

20/100

Metacritic User:

51/100

44%0%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White64.71%Jewish35.29%

1.00

LGBTQ content included:

gay

Commonsensemedia

Violence3/5
Sex5/5
Language3/5
Drugs3/5

Dove

Sex3/5
Language3/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

16%45%

Douban:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Boys and Girls (2000)

Summary: A friendship is put to the ultimate test when two best friends wind up in bed together.

Release Date: June 16, 2000

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Robert Iscove

Writers: Andrew Lowery

, Andrew Miller

Runtime: 1 h 34 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Punch 21 Productions

Distributor: Walt Disney Home Video, HBO Max, Miramax

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 35,000,000

Domestic: $ 21,799,652

International: $ 4,050,963

Box office:

Budget:$35MDomestic:$21.8MInternational:$4.1MWorldwide:$25.9M

39%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 39% higher than the critics.

11%50%

The Metacritic audience rated this 40% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

29/100

Metacritic User:

69/100

39%0%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White94.12%Jewish5.88%

2.00

LGBTQ content included:

lesbian

Commonsensemedia

Sex3/5
Language3/5
Drugs3/5

Dove

Sex3/5
Language3/5
Violence1/5
Drugs2/5
Nudity1/5

This film gets a 2.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

11%50%

Douban:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Alfie (2004)

Summary: A cockney womanizer learns the hard way about the dangers of his actions.

Release Date: November 05, 2004

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Charles Shyer

Writers: Bill Naughton

, Elaine Pope

, Charles Shyer

Runtime: 1 h 43 min

MPAA: R

Production: Paramount Pictures, Patalex Productions

Distributor: The CW Network (The CW)

Countries: United Kingdom, United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 60,000,000

Domestic: $ 13,399,812

International: $ 21,661,070

Box office:

Budget:$60MDomestic:$13.4MInternational:$21.7MWorldwide:$35.1M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Adaptation/remake:

based on play, remake

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Paramount Pictures

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 3% higher than the critics.

48%51%

The Metacritic audience rated this 27% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

49/100

Metacritic User:

76/100

61%22%

61% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White77.78%Asian11.11%Black11.11%

0.24

LGBTQ content included:

lesbian

Possibly woke elements:

interracial, interracial relationship, interracial friendship

Commonsensemedia

Message1/5
Violence1/5
Sex4/5
Language4/5
Drugs4/5

Dove

Sex5/5
Language4/5
Drugs4/5
Nudity4/5

This film gets a 0.24/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

48%51%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Standing Still (2005)

Summary: Standing Still is the story of a popular yet drunken actor who reconnects with a group of his college friends for a wedding several years after graduation.

Release Date: June 17, 2005

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Matthew Cole Weiss

Writers: Matthew Perniciaro

, Timm Sharp

Runtime: 1 h 30 min

MPAA: R

Production: Insomnia Entertainment, Rice/Walters Productions, Trent Othick Productions

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 1,700,000

Domestic: $ 30,142

Box office:

Budget:$1.7MDomestic:$30.1KWorldwide:$30.1K

-3%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -3% lower than the critics.

40%37%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

33%6%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White77.78%Jewish16.67%Mixed / Other5.56%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

homosexual, lesbian

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

40%37%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Bridget Jones's Baby (2016)

Summary: Bridget Jones' focus on her single and professional life is interrupted when she discovers she is pregnant, but is unsure of the identity of the father.

Release Date: September 16, 2016

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Sharon Maguire

Writers: Helen Fielding

, Dan Mazer

, Emma Thompson

Runtime: 2 h 03 min

MPAA: R

Production: Universal Pictures, StudioCanal, Miramax, Perfect World Pictures

Distributor: Universal Pictures, Hollywood Media Bridge

Countries: United States, France, China, United Kingdom

Language: English

Franchise: Bridget Jones's Trilogy

Movie budget: $ 35,000,000

Domestic: $ 24,252,420

International: $ 187,700,000

Box office:

Budget:$35MDomestic:$24.3MInternational:$187.7MWorldwide:$212M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Possible lazy cash grab:

sequel, third part

Franchise:

Bridget Jones's Trilogy

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Universal Pictures

Miramax

(Paramount Global subsidiary)

-13%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -13% lower than the critics.

78%65%

The Metacritic audience rated this 7% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

59/100

Metacritic User:

66/100

56%6%

56% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White94.44%Latino5.56%

0.95

LGBTQ content included:

gay, gay kiss, gay couple

Possibly woke elements:

triple f rated, f rated

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message3/5
Role model2/5
Violence1/5
Sex4/5
Language4/5
Consumerism2/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 0.95/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

78%65%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

The Skinny (2012)

Summary: Director Patrik-Ian Polk provides exciting character developments, brilliant cinematography and life lessons for all, particularly for members of the black LGBT community. Cameos by key actors from the Noah Arc series are visual d...

Release Date: February 10, 2012

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Patrik-Ian Polk

Writer: Patrik-Ian Polk

Runtime: 1 h 43 min

MPAA: TV-MA

Production: Tall Skinny Black Boy Productions, Logo, Szymon Sayz Productions

Distributor: Breaking Glass Pictures

Country: United States

Language: English

N/A

The average Rotten Tomatoes audience score is 55%.

55%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

11%59%

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

59% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

Black47.06%White35.29%Latino11.76%Jewish5.88%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

LGB:

gay, homosexual, gay kiss, gay character, gay african american, gay relationship, gay sex, lesbian, lgbt, lesbian interest, male male kiss, gay protagonist, gay bar, boyfriend boyfriend relationship

QTIA+:

first gay sexual experience, lgbt interest

BechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

55%

Douban:

IMDb:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

The Lovers (2017)

Summary: Debra Winger and Tracy Letts play a long-married, dispassionate couple who are both in the midst of serious affairs. But on the brink of calling it quits, a spark between them suddenly reignites, leading them into an impulsive rom...

Release Date: May 26, 2017

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Azazel Jacobs

Writer: Azazel Jacobs

Runtime: 1 h 37 min

MPAA: 14A

Production: A24, Live Free or Die Films

Distributor: A24

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 2,194,521

International: $ 21,562

Box office:

Domestic:$2.2MInternational:$21.6KWorldwide:$2.2M

Box office International:

Source: Box Office Mojo

-40%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -40% lower than the critics.

82%42%

The Metacritic audience rated this -14% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

76/100

Metacritic User:

62/100

46%17%

46% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White75%Latino8.33%Mixed / Other8.33%Jewish8.33%

2.00

Commonsensemedia

Violence1/5
Sex3/5
Language3/5
Drugs1/5

This film gets a 2.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

82%42%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Steel Magnolias (1989)

Summary: A young beautician, newly arrived in a small Louisiana town, finds work at the local salon, where a small group of women share a close bond of friendship, and welcome her into the fold.

Release Date: November 22, 1989

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Herbert Ross

Writer: Robert Harling

Runtime: 1 h 57 min

MPAA: PG

Production: TriStar Pictures, Rastar Films

Distributor: RCA/Columbia Pictures Home Video, CBS, Twilight Time

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 15,000,000

Domestic: $ 84,614,512

International: $ 12,145,000

Box office:

Budget:$15MDomestic:$84.6MInternational:$12.1MWorldwide:$96.8M

Adaptation/remake:

based on play

Possible Big Business:

Production:

TriStar Pictures

21%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 21% higher than the critics.

68%89%

The Metacritic audience rated this 20% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

56/100

Metacritic User:

76/100

50%0%

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White94.12%Jewish5.88%

1.00

Possibly woke elements:

strong female character,f rated

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message3/5
Role model2/5
Sex3/5
Language3/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

68%89%

Douban:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

The Longest Ride (2015)

Summary: Sophia and Luke make an unexpected and fateful connection with Ira, a 90-years old man, when they save him from a car crash. Ira's memories of his own decades-long romance with his beloved wife deeply inspire the young couple.

Release Date: April 10, 2015

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: George Tillman Jr.

Writers: Nicholas Sparks

, Craig Bolotin

Runtime: 2 h 03 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Fox 2000 Pictures, Taurus Studios, Temple Hill Entertainment

Distributor: 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 34,000,000

Domestic: $ 37,446,117

International: $ 25,498,698

Box office:

Budget:$34MDomestic:$37.4MInternational:$25.5MWorldwide:$62.9M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

40%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 40% higher than the critics.

31%71%

The Metacritic audience rated this 20% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

33/100

Metacritic User:

53/100

44%17%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White77.78%Black5.56%Asian5.56%Mixed / Other5.56%Jewish5.56%

1.70

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Role model2/5
Violence2/5
Sex4/5
Language3/5
Consumerism2/5
Drugs2/5

Dove

Sex3/5
Language4/5
Violence1/5
Drugs2/5
Nudity3/5
Other1/5

This film gets a 1.70/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

31%71%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

House Calls (1978)

Summary: Charley is a surgeon who's recently lost his wife. He embarks on a tragicomic romantic quest with woman after woman until he meets up with Ann, a singular woman closer to his own age, who immediately and unexpectedly captures his ...

Release Date: March 15, 1978

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Howard Zieff

Writers: Max Shulman

, Julius J. Epstein

, Alan Mandel

Runtime: 1 h 38 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Universal Pictures

Distributor: CBS, MCA Videocassette, Gaiam, Universal Pictures Home Entertainment (UPHE)

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 28,460,702

Box office:

Domestic:$28.5MWorldwide:$28.5M

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Universal Pictures

23%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 23% higher than the critics.

25%48%

The average Metacritic score is 49%.

Metacritic Meta:

49/100

28%17%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White77.78%Black5.56%Asian5.56%Latino5.56%Jewish5.56%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

25%48%

IMDb:

Metacritic:

OFDb:

Methodology

Other sources

Parental Guide

Parental Guide: +add

MPAA Certification

No MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?

IMDb Rating

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2106739/parentalguide

last updated: 1970-01-01Update data

Commonsensemedia Rating

https://www.commonsensemedia.org

last updated: neverUpdate data

Methodology

Other sources

boxofficemom.com
commonsensemedia.org
crosswalk.com

Global Consensus

Douban

rating: 5.7/10

MovieMeter

rating: 2.5/5

Submit your review:

* required

Critic Name

Enter your name or leave the field blank.

Password

Create a password or enter an existing one. ( Please remember your password or you will lose your username forever. Recovery emails are optional and can be added later in User Settings. )

Review Title

Rating*

Rating is just the typical 5 star rating you'd give the film like you'd see on any other review site.

Support*

Support is a boycott suggestion and is meant to be a way for us to consolidate our efforts in “voting with our dollars.” Obviously, Hollywood has proven that they will sacrifice profits for the sake of their agenda, but they’re not as monolithic as you’d think. And people still respond to incentives.

So the 3 options are:

Pay to watch:

This movie is worth your time, and you should support the creators financially so we get more content like it.

Watch it AND give them money.

Watch if free:

The show is entertaining, but you shouldn’t reward the creators for whatever reason. Perhaps you don't want to support preachy celebs who hate their fans. Or maybe you enjoy superhero movies and nostalgia bait, but don't want to encourage Hollywood to continue making them in such a high ratio.

That’s when you’d click the “Watch Now” button and choose from one of the “Free” links:

( Use at your own risk. ZeitgeistReviews does not endorse any of the links and we don’t condone piracy. And we definitely discourage you from using this Reddit thread that shows you all of the places to pirate movies & tv. )

Watch it BUT don’t give them money.

Skip it:

This means the movie wasn’t even worth your time. Maybe it's so full of Woke crap that you’ll want to pull your hair out half way through. Or it could simply just be a piece of s**t, and not in a "so bad it's good" kind of way.

Don’t watch it AND don’t give them money.

( Note: We have expanded our site from just TV & Movies. Now we have games and will add music/books/etc. So the wording might change but the sentiment is still the same for every "Support" section. )

Review text*

Note: Please wrap spoilers [spoiler] like this. [/spoiler]

Neo-Marxism

Neo-Marxism, (sometimes referred to as "Cultural Marxism"), rates the amount of fanatic egalitarianism in a film. Consider this mainly a rating for anti-nationalist and anti-capitalist themes.

Feminism

Strong and multidimensional female characters are fine. This is mainly referring to girlboss crap, unrealistic Mary Sue content, and/or egregious scenes of manhood being disparaged.

Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action rates how much "diversity" is being pushed. ( Not true diversity, but the anti-White checklist kind.)

Gay Stuff

Gay Stuff rates the amount of non-tradional sexuality depicted.

Fedora Tipping

Fedora Tipping rates the amount of atheism / Scientism™ in a film.

Audience Reviews:

No results found

Critic Reviews:

Gayby Passed!

This movie passed 3 of 3 tests. It was entered by luminum on 2012-10-05 06:34:00. luminum said:

This movie is a clear pass. There are several named female characters--Jenn, her sister Kelly, Jenn's...

Proper Review

Oct 5th 2012

BechdelTest

#Feminist #Leftist

Submit a review link

Blogosphere / Vlogosphere:

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

All movie subreddits All TV subreddits All gaming subreddits

Comments:

Your Name:

Password:

Cancel Comment

Gayby

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

Similar Movies:

Parental Guide: +add

IMDb Rating

Commonsensemedia Rating

Submit your review:

Pay to watch:

Watch if free:

Skip it:

Additional ratings

Audience Reviews:

Critic Reviews:

Blogosphere / Vlogosphere:

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

Comments: