Heartbeats

Play Trailer

Summary: The story of three close friends who are involved in a love-triangle.

Release Date: September 29, 2010

Genres: Drama, Romance

Director: Xavier Dolan

Writer: Xavier Dolan

Runtime: 1 h 41 min

MPAA: Not Rated

Production: Mifilifilms, Quebec Film and Television Tax Credit, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), Téléfilm Canada

Distributor: IFC Films

Country: Canada

Language: French

Movie budget: $ 600,000

Domestic: $ 68,723

International: $ 774,700

Box office:

Budget:$600KDomestic:$68.7KInternational:$774.7KWorldwide:$843.4K

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

-3%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -3% lower than the critics.

74%71%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

44%22%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White77.78%Latino11.11%Mixed / Other5.56%Arab5.56%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

LGB:

gay, homosexual, gay kiss, gay character, gay sex, lesbian, gay man, lgbt, bisexual, gay romance, gay protagonist

QTIA+:

lgbt interest

BechdeltestTalk about a manNo MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

74%71%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Cast

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other Cast, Production

Other cast:

Production:

Representation

Star

Supporting

Other

Production

Race	White	Asian	Black	Latino	Total	Visuals	Info
Kairos	11	2	1		14		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos
Forebears	1	1		1	3
Bettaface			1		1		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.betafaceapi.com/demo_old.html
Total	12	3	2	1	18
Cast Percentages	66.67%	16.67%	11.11%	5.56%	100%	{"name":"Cast Percentages","series":[{"name":"White","y":66.67,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":16.67,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":11.11,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}
U.S. Population (1940) Percentage	89.8%	0.19%	9.8%	1.5%		{"name":"U.S. Population (1940)","series":[{"name":"White","y":89.8,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":0.19,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":9.8,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Indigenous","y":0.3,"color":"#aaeeee"},{"name":"Latino","y":1.5,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":0,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Jewish","y":3,"color":"#ff0066"}],"prefix":""}	Source: US Census (Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (1940) Representation	-23.13	+16.48	+1.31	+4.06		{"name":"U.S. Population (1940)","series":[["White",89.8],["Asian",0.19],["Black",9.8],["Latino",1.5]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":66.67,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Asian","y":16.67,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":11.11,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Percentage	81.25%	3.5%	7.72%	6.26%		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[{"name":"White","y":6413300000000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":276400000000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":609100000000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":40300000000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":494000000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":60300000000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: Selig Center, University of Georgia
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Representation	-14.58	+13.17	+3.39	-0.7		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[["White",81.25],["Asian",3.5],["Black",7.72],["Latino",6.26]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":66.67,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Asian","y":16.67,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":11.11,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage	92.1%	0.22%	6.77%	0.69%		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":10105392917246,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":23717233578,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":742464934266,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":24223113823,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":75881820000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":0,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation	-25.43	+16.45	+4.34	+4.87		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[["White",92.1],["Asian",0.22],["Black",6.77],["Latino",0.69]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":66.67,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Asian","y":16.67,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":11.11,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
World population (1960) Percentage	24.26%	35.14%	8.74%	5.41%		{"name":"World population (1960) ","series":[{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5505891663,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":16303932915,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":3319084808,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":73088413576,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":26323680328,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":105885338709,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":16554213546,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":53158782795,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":1167943535,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (1960) Representation	+42.41	-18.47	+2.37	+0.15		{"name":"World population (1960) ","series":[["White",24.26],["Asian",35.14],["Black",8.74],["Latino",5.41]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":66.67,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Asian","y":16.67,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":11.11,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
World Buying Power Percentage	36.48%	29.46%	6.38%	9.35%		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[{"name":"White","y":3010602822170000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":771525888400000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":91700962050000,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":526264226360000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":174285727610000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":148984454560000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":526400066100000,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":2431392083750000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":572687873900000,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation	+30.19	-12.79	+4.73	-3.79		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[["White",36.48],["Asian",29.46],["Black",6.38],["Latino",9.35]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":66.67,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Asian","y":16.67,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":11.11,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
Notes		The US Census considers Pakistani, Sri Lankan, Indian, and Bangladeshi as Asians. At ZR we group Pakistanis with the Arab world. And we group Sri Lankan and Bangladeshi with India because 1.) they are all genetically similar as "South Asians and 2.) there are only a handful of actors from those regions in our database. However, you are viewing the "Asian Alone" category from the US Census when comparing it with Domestic representation. Also note that the 2000 and 2010 estimates include MultiRacial Asians not just "Asian Alone" estimates, and in some categories they include Native Hawaiians as "Asian." So there is a margin of error less than 1% and some inconsistencies with the grouping.		Many Latinos check "White" or "Other" on the Census. So this overlaps with "Mixed" race and "White." Also, when there was a discrepancy with the percentage listed on the Wikipedia table and our calculated numbers, the Wiki table's numbers were used. Likewise, when the population total was missing from the Census pdf, the estimate was calculated using the percentage from the Wiki table. NOTE: It turns out that the reason America doesn't have a separate "Latino" race is because the League of Latin American Citizens protested against discrimination towards Mexicans and got themselves to legally be considered "White." Check the research links in our Google Doc for more info.

Tags / Keywords

360 degree pan actor director producer writer actor director writer afternoon tea anger aquarium arthouse autumn banality bare chested male barefoot barefoot male best friend bing cherry bisexual bisexuality bitten earlobe blue hair bookstore bra breakup breast sucking breasts bunny rabbit cafe camera shot of bare feet camera shot of feet campfire car cat cigarette cigarette smoking clothes shopping competition cottage countryside crying cup of tea curly hair dancing dinner party driving drunkenness face slap fantasy sequence fashion faux cowboy boots female nudity firewood french french canadian friendship frown gay character gay friend gay hookup gay interest gay kiss gay man gay man bisexual man relationship gay man straight woman gay protagonist gay romance gay sex green light greeting with a kiss hairdresser hairy chest hat hatbox head scarf hide and seek high heels homosexual hostility hot fudge sundae house party infatuation interview jealousy kinsey scale kiss lack of self confidence lake lesbian kiss letter lgbt lgbt interest library love triangle male female friendship male masturbation male nudity manipulation marshmallow masturbation menage a trois metaphor mirror monologue montreal quebec morning after mother son relationship narcissism nude body double nudity one word title orgasm overdressed party passive aggressive phone message photograph pork pie hat post coitus poster present producer writer director editor profanity quitting smoking rabbit red light reference to adonis reference to alfred de musset reference to audrey hepburn reference to berlin germany reference to george sand reference to glenn close reference to hotmail reference to jacques brault reference to james dean reference to jean cocteau reference to marlon brando reference to paul newman reference to robinson crusoe reference to spock reference to the beatles rejection ringlets road trip romantic obsession sealing wax sex object sex scene shared bed shopping sleeping between two people slow motion scene small talk smelling clothes smoking in bed smooth chest straight man straight woman hookup strobe light subtitles swing talking about love talking about sex tattoo taxi tears tension the color orange theater threesome toasting marshmallows twenty something twiddling one's thumbs typewriter umbrella underwear unrequited love vengeance vietnamese restaurant voice mail white rabbit woods wool cap writer writer director writer producer writer producer director writing on the wall written and directed by cast member

Similar Movies

Parental Guide

Parental Guide: +add

MPAA Certification

No MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?

IMDb Rating

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1600524/parentalguide

last updated: 2024-10-25Update data

Commonsensemedia Rating

https://www.commonsensemedia.org

last updated: 2024-09-27Update data

Methodology

Other sources

boxofficemom.com
commonsensemedia.org
crosswalk.com

Global Consensus

Audience Reviews:

No results found

Critic Reviews:

10 Anti-Valentine’s Day Movies For Those Who Are So Over February 14

Whether you're seeking catharsis for a Valentine's Day spent single or merely wish to offset the overwhelming atmosphere of the day, these ten movies are an ideal antithesis to the saccharine

Proper Review

Feb 14th 2021

The Federalist Staff

#Christian #CenterRight

TIFF 10 Capsules — Day 6

TIFF 10 Capsules — Day 6

BLACK SWAN (Darren Aronofsky, USA, 9)

I would like to see Darren Aronofsky make nothing...

Proper Review

Dec 27th 2018

VJ Morton

#Christian #CenterRight