Indian Horse

Summary: Follows the life of Native Canadian Saul Indian Horse as he survives residential school and life amongst the racism of the 1970s. A talented hockey player, Saul must find his own path as he battles stereotypes and alcoholism.

Release Date: April 13, 2018

Genres: Drama, Sport

Director: Stephen S. Campanelli

Writers: Dennis Foon

, Richard Wagamese

Runtime: 1 h 41 min

MPAA: Not Rated

Production: Devonshire Productions, Screen Siren Pictures

Distributor: Hammond Entertainment

Country: Canada

Language: English

Domestic: $ 2,097,362

Box office:

Domestic:$2.1MWorldwide:$2.1M

Adaptation/remake:

based on book

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 8% higher than the critics.

81%89%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

44%12%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

12% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White88.24%Asian11.76%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

prejudice,discrimination,racism

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

81%89%

Douban:

IMDb:

Methodology

Cast

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other Cast, Production

Other cast:

Production:

Representation

Star

Supporting

Other

Production

Race	White	Jewish	Latino	Total	Visuals	Info
Kairos	7		1	8		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos
Ethnic	3	3		6		This is the most reliable data source for accurate ethnic breakdowns of famous people. Often the information is crowdsourced by users and they cite all their sources (family trees, obituaries, census archives, etc.) on the bottom of the page. The only issue is converting their ambiguous and inconsistent verdicts into quantifiable variables. Source: https://ethnicelebs.com/
Forebears	3			3
Surname	1			1		A third party free program that uses US Census data to create an algorithm that analyzes surnames and guesses what ethnicity the person is. Obviously there are issues with this data set such as African Americans who have the last names of their ancestors' slave owner. However, when no other data set is available, this can give a rough estimate and expand the data pool for the less important cast members with no IMDb or TMDb image. Please consider downloading their source code via GitHub to verify the accuracy of our data set, and to peer review our conclusions. Source: https://pypi.org/project/ethnicolr/
Total	14	3	1	18
Cast Percentages	77.78%	16.67%	5.56%	100%	{"name":"Cast Percentages","series":[{"name":"White","y":77.78,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":16.67,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}
U.S. Population (2000) Percentage	69.1%	1.85%	12.5%		{"name":"U.S. Population (2000)","series":[{"name":"White","y":69.1,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":0.42,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":4.23,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":12.3,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Indian","y":0.6,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Indigenous","y":0.9,"color":"#aaeeee"},{"name":"Latino","y":12.5,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":3.96,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Jewish","y":1.85,"color":"#ff0066"}],"prefix":""}	Source: US Census (Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (2000) Representation	+8.68	+14.82	-6.94		{"name":"U.S. Population (2000)","series":[["White",69.1],["Jewish",1.85],["Latino",12.5]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":77.78,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":16.67,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Percentage	81.25%		6.26%		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[{"name":"White","y":6413300000000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":276400000000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":609100000000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":40300000000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":494000000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":60300000000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: Selig Center, University of Georgia
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Representation	-3.47		-0.7		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[["White",81.25],["Jewish",0],["Latino",6.26]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":77.78,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":16.67,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage	75.87%		6.17%		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":12379223097685,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":840599779788,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":1483520178109,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":115688369276,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":1006688175500,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":490838834659,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation	+1.91		-0.61		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[["White",75.87],["Jewish",0],["Latino",6.17]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":77.78,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":16.67,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
World population (2002) Percentage	16.19%	0.34%	5.71%		{"name":"World population (2002) ","series":[{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":11666992036,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":35696748136,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":8526105205,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":101163632675,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":72726073172,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":212026003574,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":48323392485,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":132596647598,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":2119021178,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (2002) Representation	+61.59	+16.33	-0.15		{"name":"World population (2002) ","series":[["White",16.19],["Jewish",0.34],["Latino",5.71]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":77.78,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":16.67,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
World Buying Power Percentage	36.48%	1.11%	9.35%		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[{"name":"White","y":3010602822170000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":771525888400000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":91700962050000,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":526264226360000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":174285727610000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":148984454560000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":526400066100000,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":2431392083750000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":572687873900000,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation	+41.3	+15.56	-3.79		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[["White",36.48],["Jewish",1.11],["Latino",9.35]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":77.78,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":16.67,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
Notes		If there were any inconsistencies with percentages calculated using our Census data, the Jewish Data Bank percentages were the ones used. Also please review the Jewish Data Bank pdf to understand the difference between the "Core" Jewish population and the "Extended" / "Law of Return" Jewish populations. We are displaying the "Core" Jewish populations since that is what the Jewish Data Bank and Wikipedia articles chose. Also, the 1942 population estimates were used for the 1940 row. For the 2000 estimates, the "Core" definition was not used, so we used the 5.2 mil broader estimate instead of the 4.3 mil estimate since the 5.2 broader estimate seemed too drastic of a drop and the definitions weren't congruent with Core and Law of Return.	Many Latinos check "White" or "Other" on the Census. So this overlaps with "Mixed" race and "White." Also, when there was a discrepancy with the percentage listed on the Wikipedia table and our calculated numbers, the Wiki table's numbers were used. Likewise, when the population total was missing from the Census pdf, the estimate was calculated using the percentage from the Wiki table. NOTE: It turns out that the reason America doesn't have a separate "Latino" race is because the League of Latin American Citizens protested against discrimination towards Mexicans and got themselves to legally be considered "White." Check the research links in our Google Doc for more info.

Tags / Keywords

16 year old 16 year old teenage boy 26 year old 26 year old man 6 year old 6 year old girl abandoned bus abandoned by father abandoned by mother abandoned school abuse by catholic priest abusive nun addiction aerial camera shot alcoholics anonymous alcoholism almost hit by a car american indian ancestor anger anishinabeg tribe apology applause archival photographs during end credits arena assimilation ave maria the song bar bar fight based on book beating bed wetting beer begins with text bigger dreams black horse blood booing boy boy in a bathtub boy in a cage boy wears a stocking cap boy wears boxer shorts boy wears pajamas boy with long hair breakfast broken dish brother brother relationship bus campfire canada canadian candle canoe capsizing canoe carrying a dead body catholic cellar cheering child abuse chippewa tribe christian christmas play church cleaning a toilet cold the temperature communion contrition coughing cross crucifix cruelty crying crying boy crying girl crying man crying woman cutting someone's hair death death of a little girl death of brother death of grandmother death of grandson death of son despair dining hall dishwasher disinfectant dormitory double negative effect drink drinking drinking from a bottle drinking while driving duffle bag ends with text facial injury falling on the ice family relationships father son relationship fear fellatio fight fire in a steel barrel first nations fishing flash forward flashback food foster home framed photograph girl giving someone a bath grandmother and grandson hold hands grandmother grandson embrace grandmother grandson relationship graveyard great grandfather great grandson relationship group therapy hallucination handshake haunted by the past hiding place hiding under s stairway hit in the face hockey sport homesickness hopelessness horse humility husband wife relationship ice hockey ice hockey fight ice hockey player ice hockey puck ice hockey rink ice hockey team ice skates ice skating imitating an indian indian reserve indigenous people inuit kicked in the stomach knife lake latin laughter learning how to ice skate legal guardian locker room looking out a window lord's prayer making a snow angel male male embrace man carries a dead boy man reads a newspaper man teenage boy embrace man wears eyeglasses manitouwadge ontario canada memory metal pipe mining town montage mother son relationship name calling narrated by character narrated by protagonist national hockey league native american newspaper nhl nickname north wind nun obsession ojibway tribe ojibwe tribe old woman orphan pain penalty penalty box pickup truck playing in the snow police car police horse prayer prayer song prejudice pride priest priest boy embrace promise punishment rabbit racial discrimination racial prejudice racism racism in canada red rock ontario canada reference to reggie leach religion religious statue renaming someone residential school return to the past rifle rise and fall river river rapids sadism salishan saying goodbye school bus scissors scrubbing the floor sexual molestation shoveling snow silent night the song singer singing skipping a stone slapping the palm of someone's hand sleeping slow motion scene snow snowing song spirit song stairway stone story telling street life subjective camera subtitled scene suffering suicide by stabbing suicide of a girl surname as title surrogate brother surrogate brother relationship surrogate father surrogate son relationship surrogate mother surrogate son relationship survivor teacher teaching one's self how to ice skate teenage boy teenage boy with long hair tent the number 13 throwing a stone at a window timeframe 1970s title produced by female toronto maple leafs toronto ontario canada toy indian figurine tronto monarchs urinating on someone urination violence voice over narration wading in water washing someone's mouth out with soap watching ice hockey on tv watching tv welcome home whooping woman embraces a teenage boy woman hits a boy woman slaps a girl woods year 1886 year 1959 year 1968 year 1979 year 2008 younger version of character

Similar Movies

Parental Guide

Parental Guide: +add

MPAA Certification

No MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?

IMDb Rating

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5672286/parentalguide

last updated: 2024-10-26Update data

Commonsensemedia Rating

https://www.commonsensemedia.org

last updated: 2024-09-27Update data

Methodology

Other sources

boxofficemom.com
commonsensemedia.org
crosswalk.com

Global Consensus

Douban

rating: 7.6/10

douban:

Submit your review:

* required

Critic Name

Enter your name or leave the field blank.

Password

Create a password or enter an existing one. ( Please remember your password or you will lose your username forever. Recovery emails are optional and can be added later in User Settings. )

Review Title

Rating*

Rating is just the typical 5 star rating you'd give the film like you'd see on any other review site.

Support*

Support is a boycott suggestion and is meant to be a way for us to consolidate our efforts in “voting with our dollars.” Obviously, Hollywood has proven that they will sacrifice profits for the sake of their agenda, but they’re not as monolithic as you’d think. And people still respond to incentives.

So the 3 options are:

Pay to watch:

This movie is worth your time, and you should support the creators financially so we get more content like it.

Watch it AND give them money.

Watch if free:

The show is entertaining, but you shouldn’t reward the creators for whatever reason. Perhaps you don't want to support preachy celebs who hate their fans. Or maybe you enjoy superhero movies and nostalgia bait, but don't want to encourage Hollywood to continue making them in such a high ratio.

That’s when you’d click the “Watch Now” button and choose from one of the “Free” links:

( Use at your own risk. ZeitgeistReviews does not endorse any of the links and we don’t condone piracy. And we definitely discourage you from using this Reddit thread that shows you all of the places to pirate movies & tv. )

Watch it BUT don’t give them money.

Skip it:

This means the movie wasn’t even worth your time. Maybe it's so full of Woke crap that you’ll want to pull your hair out half way through. Or it could simply just be a piece of s**t, and not in a "so bad it's good" kind of way.

Don’t watch it AND don’t give them money.

( Note: We have expanded our site from just TV & Movies. Now we have games and will add music/books/etc. So the wording might change but the sentiment is still the same for every "Support" section. )

Review text*

Note: Please wrap spoilers [spoiler] like this. [/spoiler]

Neo-Marxism

Neo-Marxism, (sometimes referred to as "Cultural Marxism"), rates the amount of fanatic egalitarianism in a film. Consider this mainly a rating for anti-nationalist and anti-capitalist themes.

Feminism

Strong and multidimensional female characters are fine. This is mainly referring to girlboss crap, unrealistic Mary Sue content, and/or egregious scenes of manhood being disparaged.

Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action rates how much "diversity" is being pushed. ( Not true diversity, but the anti-White checklist kind.)

Gay Stuff

Gay Stuff rates the amount of non-tradional sexuality depicted.

Fedora Tipping

Fedora Tipping rates the amount of atheism / Scientism™ in a film.

Audience Reviews:

No results found

Critic Reviews:

Submit a review link

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

All movie subreddits All TV subreddits All gaming subreddits

Comments:

Your Name:

Password:

Cancel Comment

Indian Horse

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

Parental Guide: +add

IMDb Rating

Commonsensemedia Rating

douban:

Submit your review:

Pay to watch:

Watch if free:

Skip it:

Additional ratings

Audience Reviews:

Critic Reviews:

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

Comments: