L.A. Slasher

Summary: Driven to rage over the tawdry excesses of reality television, a self-appointed cultural crusader kidnaps several very famous nobodies to make his point- but his crimes only generate more tabloid frenzy.

Release Date: June 28, 2016

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Crime

Director: Martin Owen

Writers: Martin Owen

, Abigail Wright

, Elizabeth Morris

Runtime: 1 h 24 min

MPAA: R

Production: JWright Productions, JJS Films

Countries: United States, United Kingdom

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 10,000

Domestic: $ 2,421

Box office:

Budget:$10KDomestic:$2.4KWorldwide:$2.4K

N/A

The average Rotten Tomatoes audience score is 7%.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

61%17%

61% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White83.33%Latino11.11%Mixed / Other5.56%

0.10

Commonsensemedia

Violence5/5
Sex5/5
Language5/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 0.10/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Cast

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other Cast, Production

Other cast:

Production:

Representation

Star

Supporting

Other

Production

Race	White	Jewish	Black	Latino	Total	Visuals	Info
Kairos	6			1	7		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos
Forebears	3		1		4
Ethnic	1	1			2		This is the most reliable data source for accurate ethnic breakdowns of famous people. Often the information is crowdsourced by users and they cite all their sources (family trees, obituaries, census archives, etc.) on the bottom of the page. The only issue is converting their ambiguous and inconsistent verdicts into quantifiable variables. Source: https://ethnicelebs.com/
Total	10	1	1	1	13
Cast Percentages	76.92%	7.69%	7.69%	7.69%	100%	{"name":"Cast Percentages","series":[{"name":"White","y":76.92,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":7.69,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":7.69,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":7.69,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}
U.S. Population (2010) Percentage	63.7%	1.71%	12.6%	16.3%		{"name":"U.S. Population (2010)","series":[{"name":"White","y":63.7,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":0.55,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":5.61,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":12.6,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Indian","y":0.92,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Indigenous","y":0.9,"color":"#aaeeee"},{"name":"Latino","y":16.3,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":4.56,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Jewish","y":1.71,"color":"#ff0066"}],"prefix":""}	Source: US Census (Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (2010) Representation	+13.22	+5.98	-4.91	-8.61		{"name":"U.S. Population (2010)","series":[["White",63.7],["Jewish",1.71],["Black",12.6],["Latino",16.3]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":76.92,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":7.69,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Black","y":7.69,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Latino","y":7.69,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
U.S. Buying Power (2010) Percentage	77.06%		7.85%	8.32%		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2010)","series":[{"name":"White","y":9431400000000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":603500000000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":961200000000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":82500000000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":1018000000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":143100000000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: Selig Center, University of Georgia
U.S. Buying Power (2010) Representation	-0.14		-0.16	-0.63		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2010)","series":[["White",77.06],["Jewish",0],["Black",7.85],["Latino",8.32]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":76.92,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":7.69,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Black","y":7.69,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Latino","y":7.69,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage	71.15%		9.47%	8.18%		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":12065231364840,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":1178671127869,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":1606718414206,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":122312425647,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":1387884860824,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":597570916909,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation	+5.77		-1.78	-0.49		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[["White",71.15],["Jewish",0],["Black",9.47],["Latino",8.18]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":76.92,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":7.69,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Black","y":7.69,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Latino","y":7.69,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
World population (2008) Percentage	15.41%	0.34%	12.53%	5.73%		{"name":"World population (2008) ","series":[{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":12498359385,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":38597365449,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":9371886593,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":103751009514,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":84352673311,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":221926946499,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":54440432424,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":145994209360,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":2269364047,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (2008) Representation	+61.51	+7.35	-4.84	+1.96		{"name":"World population (2008) ","series":[["White",15.41],["Jewish",0.34],["Black",12.53],["Latino",5.73]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":76.92,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":7.69,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Black","y":7.69,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Latino","y":7.69,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
World Buying Power Percentage	36.48%	1.11%	6.38%	9.35%		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[{"name":"White","y":3010602822170000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":771525888400000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":91700962050000,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":526264226360000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":174285727610000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":148984454560000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":526400066100000,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":2431392083750000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":572687873900000,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation	+40.44	+6.58	+1.31	-1.66		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[["White",36.48],["Jewish",1.11],["Black",6.38],["Latino",9.35]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":76.92,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":7.69,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Black","y":7.69,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Latino","y":7.69,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
Notes		If there were any inconsistencies with percentages calculated using our Census data, the Jewish Data Bank percentages were the ones used. Also please review the Jewish Data Bank pdf to understand the difference between the "Core" Jewish population and the "Extended" / "Law of Return" Jewish populations. We are displaying the "Core" Jewish populations since that is what the Jewish Data Bank and Wikipedia articles chose. Also, the 1942 population estimates were used for the 1940 row. For the 2000 estimates, the "Core" definition was not used, so we used the 5.2 mil broader estimate instead of the 4.3 mil estimate since the 5.2 broader estimate seemed too drastic of a drop and the definitions weren't congruent with Core and Law of Return.		Many Latinos check "White" or "Other" on the Census. So this overlaps with "Mixed" race and "White." Also, when there was a discrepancy with the percentage listed on the Wikipedia table and our calculated numbers, the Wiki table's numbers were used. Likewise, when the population total was missing from the Census pdf, the estimate was calculated using the percentage from the Wiki table. NOTE: It turns out that the reason America doesn't have a separate "Latino" race is because the League of Latin American Citizens protested against discrimination towards Mexicans and got themselves to legally be considered "White." Check the research links in our Google Doc for more info.

Tags / Keywords

child child abduction city daughter father los angeles california missing child parent reality star slasher stardom surveillance

Similar Movies

Parental Guide

Parental Guide: +add

This film gets a 0.1/5 family friendly score

MPAA Certification	No MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?
IMDb Rating https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2735292/parentalguide last updated: 2024-10-26Update data
Commonsensemedia Rating https://www.commonsensemedia.org/movie-reviews/la-slasher last updated: 2024-10-26Update data
Message 0/5	Takes a stand against reality TV, people being famous for no reason, and too much social media, although it also seems intoxicated by these same things. The movie's whole world feels very plastic and inhuman, as if everything were for sale. People become so caught up in the serial killer that they follow him online and become "fans." Yet it's all so numbing that it doesn't really give viewers a chance to care.
Role model 0/5	There are barely any characters in this, let alone role models. The most frequently shown character is a masked killer. Women are portrayed in a very sexualized manner.
Violence 5/5	Very gory blood spatters and blood-covered victims. Victims (mostly women) captured and briefly tortured. Shooting and stabbing. Body dragged behind a van. Victim drowned in a pool.
Sex 5/5	Somewhat graphic sex scenes with moaning. Characters work as strippers and porn stars and are shown wearing sexy/skimpy clothing. A sex tape is leaked. Brief toplessness. Drawing of an ejaculating penis. References to masturbation. Innuendo. A sex joke. Real-life porn star Tori Black plays a role.
Language 5/5	Very frequent use of extremely strong language, including "f--k," "s--t," and "bitch," as well as "t-ts," "p---y," "c--k," "d--k," "ass," "slut," "douchebag," "sucks," and "whore."
Consumerism 1/5	Twinkies are shown and discussed. Several "tweets" are shown (and viewers will know what they are), but Twitter itself isn't shown or referenced.
Drugs 3/5	Secondary characters are drug dealers. Another secondary character has a drug trip. Secondary character is shown drunk. Many characters drink socially.

Methodology

Other sources

boxofficemom.com
commonsensemedia.org
crosswalk.com

Global Consensus

Douban

rating: 4/10

Kinopoisk

rating: 3.4/10

OFDb

rating: 3.6/10

Submit your review:

* required

Critic Name

Enter your name or leave the field blank.

Password

Create a password or enter an existing one. ( Please remember your password or you will lose your username forever. Recovery emails are optional and can be added later in User Settings. )

Review Title

Rating*

Rating is just the typical 5 star rating you'd give the film like you'd see on any other review site.

Support*

Support is a boycott suggestion and is meant to be a way for us to consolidate our efforts in “voting with our dollars.” Obviously, Hollywood has proven that they will sacrifice profits for the sake of their agenda, but they’re not as monolithic as you’d think. And people still respond to incentives.

So the 3 options are:

Pay to watch:

This movie is worth your time, and you should support the creators financially so we get more content like it.

Watch it AND give them money.

Watch if free:

The show is entertaining, but you shouldn’t reward the creators for whatever reason. Perhaps you don't want to support preachy celebs who hate their fans. Or maybe you enjoy superhero movies and nostalgia bait, but don't want to encourage Hollywood to continue making them in such a high ratio.

That’s when you’d click the “Watch Now” button and choose from one of the “Free” links:

( Use at your own risk. ZeitgeistReviews does not endorse any of the links and we don’t condone piracy. And we definitely discourage you from using this Reddit thread that shows you all of the places to pirate movies & tv. )

Watch it BUT don’t give them money.

Skip it:

This means the movie wasn’t even worth your time. Maybe it's so full of Woke crap that you’ll want to pull your hair out half way through. Or it could simply just be a piece of s**t, and not in a "so bad it's good" kind of way.

Don’t watch it AND don’t give them money.

( Note: We have expanded our site from just TV & Movies. Now we have games and will add music/books/etc. So the wording might change but the sentiment is still the same for every "Support" section. )

Review text*

Note: Please wrap spoilers [spoiler] like this. [/spoiler]

Neo-Marxism

Neo-Marxism, (sometimes referred to as "Cultural Marxism"), rates the amount of fanatic egalitarianism in a film. Consider this mainly a rating for anti-nationalist and anti-capitalist themes.

Feminism

Strong and multidimensional female characters are fine. This is mainly referring to girlboss crap, unrealistic Mary Sue content, and/or egregious scenes of manhood being disparaged.

Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action rates how much "diversity" is being pushed. ( Not true diversity, but the anti-White checklist kind.)

Gay Stuff

Gay Stuff rates the amount of non-tradional sexuality depicted.

Fedora Tipping

Fedora Tipping rates the amount of atheism / Scientism™ in a film.

Audience Reviews:

No results found

Critic Reviews:

Submit a review link

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

All movie subreddits All TV subreddits All gaming subreddits

Comments:

Your Name:

Password:

Cancel Comment

L.A. Slasher

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

Parental Guide: +add

IMDb Rating

Commonsensemedia Rating

Submit your review:

Pay to watch:

Watch if free:

Skip it:

Additional ratings

Audience Reviews:

Critic Reviews:

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

Comments: