Presenting Princess Shaw

Summary: A documentary on the collaborative relationship between New Orleans based songwriter/YouTube star Samantha Montgomery and composer/video artist Ophir Kutiel.

Release Date: May 27, 2016

Genres: Music, Documentary

Director: Ido Haar

Writer: Ido Haar

Runtime: 1 h 23 min

MPAA: Not Rated

Production: First Hand Films

Country: Israel

Language: English

Domestic: $ 60,197

Box office:

Domestic:$60.2KWorldwide:$60.2K

-26%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -26% lower than the critics.

91%65%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

25%33%

25% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White66.67%Black33.33%

0.95

Commonsensemedia

Message3/5
Role model3/5
Violence3/5
Sex3/5
Language4/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 0.95/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

91%65%

IMDb:

Moviemeter:

Methodology

Cast

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other Cast, Production

Other cast:

Production:

Representation

Star

Supporting

Other

Production

Race	White	Total	Visuals	Info
Kairos	5	5		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos
Forebears	5	5
Surname	1	1		A third party free program that uses US Census data to create an algorithm that analyzes surnames and guesses what ethnicity the person is. Obviously there are issues with this data set such as African Americans who have the last names of their ancestors' slave owner. However, when no other data set is available, this can give a rough estimate and expand the data pool for the less important cast members with no IMDb or TMDb image. Please consider downloading their source code via GitHub to verify the accuracy of our data set, and to peer review our conclusions. Source: https://pypi.org/project/ethnicolr/
Total	11	11
Cast Percentages	100%	100%	{"name":"Cast Percentages","series":[{"name":"White","y":100,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}
U.S. Population (1960) Percentage	88.6%		{"name":"U.S. Population (1960)","series":[{"name":"White","y":88.6,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":0.55,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":10.5,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Indigenous","y":0.3,"color":"#aaeeee"},{"name":"Latino","y":3.2,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":0.04,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Jewish","y":3.08,"color":"#ff0066"}],"prefix":""}	Source: US Census (Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (1960) Representation	+11.4		{"name":"U.S. Population (1960)","series":[["White",88.6]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":100,"color":"#2b908f"}]}
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Percentage	81.25%		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[{"name":"White","y":6413300000000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":276400000000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":609100000000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":40300000000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":494000000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":60300000000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: Selig Center, University of Georgia
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Representation	+18.75		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[["White",81.25]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":100,"color":"#2b908f"}]}
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage	90.44%		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":10443346085993,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":71912137887,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":833236433847,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":25372254021,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":169560832000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":3262077899,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation	+9.56		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[["White",90.44]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":100,"color":"#2b908f"}]}
World population (1963) Percentage	23.93%		{"name":"World population (1963) ","series":[{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5968431306,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":17490015208,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":3605020255,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":75866964788,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":28107908531,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":110273597214,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":17879227240,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":56659530391,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":1234964289,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (1963) Representation	+76.07		{"name":"World population (1963) ","series":[["White",23.93]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":100,"color":"#2b908f"}]}
World Buying Power Percentage	36.48%		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[{"name":"White","y":3010602822170000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":771525888400000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":91700962050000,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":526264226360000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":174285727610000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":148984454560000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":526400066100000,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":2431392083750000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":572687873900000,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation	+63.52		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[["White",36.48]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":100,"color":"#2b908f"}]}
Notes

Tags / Keywords

artist bully flatulence laxative money school

Similar Movies

Parental Guide

Parental Guide: +add

This film gets a 0.95/5 family friendly score

MPAA Certification	No MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?
IMDb Rating https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4161074/parentalguide last updated: 2024-10-26Update data
Commonsensemedia Rating https://www.commonsensemedia.org/movie-reviews/presenting-princess-shaw last updated: 2024-10-26Update data
Message 3/5	Even if following your passion doesn't pay off financially, it still offers worthwhile emotional dividends. Failing to protect children from sexual predators can lead to deep, lasting damage.
Role model 3/5	Montgomery shows great inner strength. Sexually abused as a child by her mother's boyfriend, Montgomery recounts that she was told to hide her emotions and that if she cried, she was weak. Now she frankly spills her emotions in her songs and confessionals on YouTube. Kutiman is a musician who uses and appreciates the work of other talented musicians.
Violence 3/5	Montgomery describes being sexually abused as a child by her mother's boyfriend. When she tried to tell, her mother beat her. None of this is shown. Montgomery notes that men like her mother's boyfriend are looking past the mothers to their children, and then they "pick the weak ones." Tires are stolen from Montgomery's car.
Sex 3/5	Montgomery says she learned about sex early (in relation to being abused -- see "Violence" section), and she laments that no child should be forced to know about oral sex and penetration, as she was.
Language 4/5	Language includes uses of "f--k, "s--t," "hell," "damn," "ass," and the "N" word.
Consumerism 1/5	Montgomery eats at Burger King. YouTube is heavily featured.
Drugs 3/5	Adults smoke cigarettes, and it appears that some also smoke marijuana.

Methodology

Other sources

boxofficemom.com
commonsensemedia.org
crosswalk.com

Global Consensus

MovieMeter

rating: 3.1/5

douban:

Submit your review:

* required

Critic Name

Enter your name or leave the field blank.

Password

Create a password or enter an existing one. ( Please remember your password or you will lose your username forever. Recovery emails are optional and can be added later in User Settings. )

Review Title

Rating*

Rating is just the typical 5 star rating you'd give the film like you'd see on any other review site.

Support*

Support is a boycott suggestion and is meant to be a way for us to consolidate our efforts in “voting with our dollars.” Obviously, Hollywood has proven that they will sacrifice profits for the sake of their agenda, but they’re not as monolithic as you’d think. And people still respond to incentives.

So the 3 options are:

Pay to watch:

This movie is worth your time, and you should support the creators financially so we get more content like it.

Watch it AND give them money.

Watch if free:

The show is entertaining, but you shouldn’t reward the creators for whatever reason. Perhaps you don't want to support preachy celebs who hate their fans. Or maybe you enjoy superhero movies and nostalgia bait, but don't want to encourage Hollywood to continue making them in such a high ratio.

That’s when you’d click the “Watch Now” button and choose from one of the “Free” links:

( Use at your own risk. ZeitgeistReviews does not endorse any of the links and we don’t condone piracy. And we definitely discourage you from using this Reddit thread that shows you all of the places to pirate movies & tv. )

Watch it BUT don’t give them money.

Skip it:

This means the movie wasn’t even worth your time. Maybe it's so full of Woke crap that you’ll want to pull your hair out half way through. Or it could simply just be a piece of s**t, and not in a "so bad it's good" kind of way.

Don’t watch it AND don’t give them money.

( Note: We have expanded our site from just TV & Movies. Now we have games and will add music/books/etc. So the wording might change but the sentiment is still the same for every "Support" section. )

Review text*

Note: Please wrap spoilers [spoiler] like this. [/spoiler]

Neo-Marxism

Neo-Marxism, (sometimes referred to as "Cultural Marxism"), rates the amount of fanatic egalitarianism in a film. Consider this mainly a rating for anti-nationalist and anti-capitalist themes.

Feminism

Strong and multidimensional female characters are fine. This is mainly referring to girlboss crap, unrealistic Mary Sue content, and/or egregious scenes of manhood being disparaged.

Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action rates how much "diversity" is being pushed. ( Not true diversity, but the anti-White checklist kind.)

Gay Stuff

Gay Stuff rates the amount of non-tradional sexuality depicted.

Fedora Tipping

Fedora Tipping rates the amount of atheism / Scientism™ in a film.

Audience Reviews:

No results found

Critic Reviews:

Submit a review link

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

All movie subreddits All TV subreddits All gaming subreddits

Comments:

Your Name:

Password:

Cancel Comment

Presenting Princess Shaw

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

Parental Guide: +add

IMDb Rating

Commonsensemedia Rating

douban:

Submit your review:

Pay to watch:

Watch if free:

Skip it:

Additional ratings

Audience Reviews:

Critic Reviews:

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

Comments: