Ride

Play Trailer

Summary: A group of young people take an old bus from Harlem to Miami to make a rap music video there.

Release Date: March 27, 1998

Genre: Comedy

Director: Millicent Shelton

Writer: Millicent Shelton

Runtime: 1 h 30 min

MPAA: R

Production: Dimension Films, The Hudlin Brothers

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 5,485,295

Box office:

Domestic:$5.5MWorldwide:$5.5M

N/A

The average Rotten Tomatoes audience score is 72%.

72%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

33%88%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

88% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

Black56.25%White12.5%Asian12.5%Latino12.5%Arab6.25%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

72%

IMDb:

OFDb:

Methodology

Cast

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other Cast, Production

Other cast:

Production:

Representation

Star

Supporting

Other

Production

Race	Black	Arab	Asian	White	Mixed / Other	Latino	Total	Visuals	Info
Kairos	7		1			1	9		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos
Forebears		2		2			4
Ethnic	2				1		3		This is the most reliable data source for accurate ethnic breakdowns of famous people. Often the information is crowdsourced by users and they cite all their sources (family trees, obituaries, census archives, etc.) on the bottom of the page. The only issue is converting their ambiguous and inconsistent verdicts into quantifiable variables. Source: https://ethnicelebs.com/
Bettaface		1	1				2		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.betafaceapi.com/demo_old.html
Total	9	3	2	2	1	1	18
Cast Percentages	50%	16.67%	11.11%	11.11%	5.56%	5.56%	100%	{"name":"Cast Percentages","series":[{"name":"Black","y":50,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":16.67,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":11.11,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.56,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}
U.S. Population (2000) Percentage	12.3%	0.42%	4.23%	69.1%	3.96%	12.5%		{"name":"U.S. Population (2000)","series":[{"name":"White","y":69.1,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":0.42,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":4.23,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":12.3,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Indian","y":0.6,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Indigenous","y":0.9,"color":"#aaeeee"},{"name":"Latino","y":12.5,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":3.96,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Jewish","y":1.85,"color":"#ff0066"}],"prefix":""}	Source: US Census (Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (2000) Representation	+37.7	+16.25	+6.88	-57.99	+1.6	-6.94		{"name":"U.S. Population (2000)","series":[["Black",12.3],["Arab",0.42],["Asian",4.23],["White",69.1],["Mixed \/ Other",3.96],["Latino",12.5]],"cast":[{"name":"Black","y":50,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Arab","y":16.67,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"White","y":11.11,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.56,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Percentage	7.72%		3.5%	81.25%	0.76%	6.26%		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[{"name":"White","y":6413300000000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":276400000000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":609100000000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":40300000000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":494000000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":60300000000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: Selig Center, University of Georgia
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Representation	+42.28		+7.61	-70.14	+4.8	-0.7		{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[["Black",7.72],["Arab",0],["Asian",3.5],["White",81.25],["Mixed \/ Other",0.76],["Latino",6.26]],"cast":[{"name":"Black","y":50,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Arab","y":16.67,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"White","y":11.11,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.56,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage	9.09%		5.15%	75.87%	3.01%	6.17%		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":11872597712221,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":806197848092,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":1422806434108,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":110953769680,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":965489000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":470751030130,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation	+40.91		+5.96	-64.76	+2.55	-0.61		{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[["Black",9.09],["Arab",0],["Asian",5.15],["White",75.87],["Mixed \/ Other",3.01],["Latino",6.17]],"cast":[{"name":"Black","y":50,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Arab","y":16.67,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"White","y":11.11,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.56,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
World population (1998) Percentage	11.14%	7.53%	34.44%	16.81%	1.9%	5.7%		{"name":"World population (1998) ","series":[{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":11240163113,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":33789333940,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":8008119274,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":99712484940,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":66035704683,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":204238902722,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":44623813256,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":123347457749,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":2010183642,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (1998) Representation	+38.86	+9.14	-23.33	-5.7	+3.66	-0.14		{"name":"World population (1998) ","series":[["Black",11.14],["Arab",7.53],["Asian",34.44],["White",16.81],["Mixed \/ Other",1.9],["Latino",5.7]],"cast":[{"name":"Black","y":50,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Arab","y":16.67,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"White","y":11.11,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.56,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
World Buying Power Percentage	6.38%	6.38%	29.46%	36.48%	1.81%	9.35%		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[{"name":"White","y":3010602822170000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":771525888400000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":91700962050000,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":526264226360000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":174285727610000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":148984454560000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":526400066100000,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":2431392083750000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":572687873900000,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation	+43.62	+10.29	-18.35	-25.37	+3.75	-3.79		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[["Black",6.38],["Arab",6.38],["Asian",29.46],["White",36.48],["Mixed \/ Other",1.81],["Latino",9.35]],"cast":[{"name":"Black","y":50,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Arab","y":16.67,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"White","y":11.11,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":5.56,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"}]}
Notes		Arab Americans are less than 1% of the US population and often check "White" or "Other" on the US Census. And the only data available for them started when the US Census added ancestry in 1980. So assume a less than 1% margin of error and overlap with the "White" and "Other" categories.	The US Census considers Pakistani, Sri Lankan, Indian, and Bangladeshi as Asians. At ZR we group Pakistanis with the Arab world. And we group Sri Lankan and Bangladeshi with India because 1.) they are all genetically similar as "South Asians and 2.) there are only a handful of actors from those regions in our database. However, you are viewing the "Asian Alone" category from the US Census when comparing it with Domestic representation. Also note that the 2000 and 2010 estimates include MultiRacial Asians not just "Asian Alone" estimates, and in some categories they include Native Hawaiians as "Asian." So there is a margin of error less than 1% and some inconsistencies with the grouping.		The "Mixed / Other" categories overlap, and the 2 or more category was not an option until the 2000 Census. So for the combined column, all data will be taken from the "Other" column except for 2000, 2010, & 2020. For those, the average between the "2 or More Races" and "Some Other Race" will be used.	Many Latinos check "White" or "Other" on the Census. So this overlaps with "Mixed" race and "White." Also, when there was a discrepancy with the percentage listed on the Wikipedia table and our calculated numbers, the Wiki table's numbers were used. Likewise, when the population total was missing from the Census pdf, the estimate was calculated using the percentage from the Wiki table. NOTE: It turns out that the reason America doesn't have a separate "Latino" race is because the League of Latin American Citizens protested against discrimination towards Mexicans and got themselves to legally be considered "White." Check the research links in our Google Doc for more info.

Tags / Keywords

f rated female director female filmmaker flatulence hip hop independent film one word title title directed by female

Similar Movies

Similar Movies:

Doctor Dolittle (1998)

Summary: A doctor discovers that he can communicate with animals.

Release Date: June 26, 1998

Genres: Comedy, Family, Fantasy

Director: Betty Thomas

Writers: Hugh Lofting

, Nat Mauldin

, Larry Levin

Runtime: 1 h 25 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Twentieth Century Fox, Davis Entertainment, Joseph M. Singer Entertainment

Distributor: Twentieth Century Fox, 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, Fox Network, American Broadcasting Company (ABC), The WB Television Network, Disney Channel, Disney+, HBO Max

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 71,500,000

Domestic: $ 144,156,605

International: $ 150,300,000

Box office:

Budget:$71.5MDomestic:$144.2MInternational:$150.3MWorldwide:$294.5M

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel, remake

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

39%56%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

56% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White33.33%Black33.33%Asian11.11%Latino11.11%Jewish11.11%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

BechdeltestTalk about a manNo MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

ZR Audience:

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Laura Cadieux I (1998)

Summary: Large women with a zest for life gather weekly at a Montreal doctor's office to receive diet injections.

Release Date: September 25, 1998

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Denise Filiatrault

Writers: Denise Filiatrault

, Michel Tremblay

Runtime: 1 h 31 min

MPAA: 13+

Production: Cinémaginaire Inc., OFDC Production, Téléfilm Canada

Country: Canada

Language: French

Domestic: $ 1,633,000

Box office:

Domestic:$1.6MWorldwide:$1.6M

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel

N/A

The average Rotten Tomatoes audience score is 50%.

50%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

61%6%

61% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White94.12%Latino5.88%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

prejudice,f rated

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

50%

IMDb:

Methodology

What a Girl Wants (2003)

Summary: An American teenager learns that her father is a wealthy British politician running for office. Although she is eager to find him, she realizes it could cause a scandal and cost him the election.

Release Date: April 04, 2003

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Family

Director: Dennie Gordon

Writers: William Douglas-Home

, Jenny Bicks

, Elizabeth Chandler

Runtime: 1 h 45 min

MPAA: G

Production: Warner Bros., Gaylord Films, DiNovi Pictures, Gerber Pictures, HSI Tomorrow Film, Sloane Square Films

Distributor: Warner Bros., American Broadcasting Company (ABC), HBO Max, Nickelodeon Network

Countries: United States, United Kingdom

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 25,000,000

Domestic: $ 36,105,433

International: $ 14,626,706

Box office:

Budget:$25MDomestic:$36.1MInternational:$14.6MWorldwide:$50.7M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Adaptation/remake:

title based on song, remake

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Warner Bros.

26%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 26% higher than the critics.

36%62%

The Metacritic audience rated this 20% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

41/100

Metacritic User:

61/100

33%6%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White88.24%Mixed / Other5.88%Jewish5.88%

3.00

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Role model2/5
Violence2/5
Sex2/5
Language2/5
Consumerism3/5
Drugs2/5

Dove

Language1/5
Violence1/5
Drugs1/5

This film gets a 3.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

36%62%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Bangalore Days (2014)

Summary: A fun roller coaster ride about three young people, Aju, Divya and Kuttan who are cousins, reach Bangalore to dream, discover and explore.

Release Date: May 30, 2014

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Anjali Menon

Writer: Anjali Menon

Runtime: 2 h 51 min

MPAA: Not Rated

Production: Anwar Rasheed Entertainment, Weekend Blockbusters

Country: India

Language: Malayalam

Box office:

Worldwide:$180.2K

N/A

The average Rotten Tomatoes audience score is 88%.

88%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

50%100%

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

100% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

Asian55.56%Indian38.89%Arab5.56%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

88%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Methodology

Tall Girl (2019)

Summary: Jodi, the tallest girl in her high school, has always felt uncomfortable in her own skin. But after years of slouching, being made fun of, and avoiding attention at all costs, Jodi finally decides to find the confidence to stand t...

Release Date: September 13, 2019

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Family

Director: Nzingha Stewart

Writer: Sam Wolfson

Runtime: 1 h 41 min

MPAA: TV-PG

Production: Wonderland Sound and Vision

Distributor: Netflix

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 13,600,000

Budget:$13.6M

-19%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -19% lower than the critics.

42%23%

The average Metacritic audience score is 27%.

Metacritic User:

27/100

56%41%

56% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

41% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White58.82%Mixed / Other23.53%Black17.65%

3.50

Possibly woke elements:

prejudice,strong female lead,f rated

BechdeltestPassed!MPAATV-PG

IMDb

VIOLENCEMildPROFANITYMild

This film gets a 3.50/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

42%23%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

In a World... (2013)

Summary: An underachieving voice coach finds herself competing in the movie trailer voice-over profession against her arrogant father and his protégé.

Release Date: September 13, 2013

Genre: Comedy

Director: Lake Bell

Writer: Lake Bell

Runtime: 1 h 33 min

MPAA: PG

Production: 3311 Productions, In A World, Team G

Distributor: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 2,963,902

International: $ 151,051

Box office:

Domestic:$3MInternational:$151.1KWorldwide:$3.1M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

-21%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -21% lower than the critics.

92%71%

The Metacritic audience rated this -13% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

79/100

Metacritic User:

66/100

72%11%

72% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White66.67%Jewish22.22%Mixed / Other11.11%

0.95

Possibly woke elements:

triple f rated,sexism,f rated

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message3/5
Role model1/5
Violence1/5
Sex4/5
Language4/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs2/5

This film gets a 0.95/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

92%71%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Laggies (2014)

Summary: In the throes of a quarter-life crisis, Megan panics when her boyfriend proposes. She takes an opportunity to escape for a week, hiding out in the house of her new 16-year-old friend Annika and her world-weary single dad.

Release Date: November 07, 2014

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Lynn Shelton

Writer: Andrea Seigel

Runtime: 1 h 39 min

MPAA: R

Production: Anonymous Content, BR Capital Group, Merced Media Partners, Siren Digital - Hollywood, Solution Entertainment Group

Distributor: HBO Max, HBO Zone, KVH Media Group

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 5,000,000

Domestic: $ 1,066,981

International: $ 1,312,173

Box office:

Budget:$5MDomestic:$1.1MInternational:$1.3MWorldwide:$2.4M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

-15%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -15% lower than the critics.

65%50%

The Metacritic audience rated this 3% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

63/100

Metacritic User:

66/100

61%0%

61% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White94.44%Jewish5.56%

0.95

LGBTQ content included:

lesbian

Possibly woke elements:

triple f rated, f rated

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message3/5
Role model1/5
Violence1/5
Sex2/5
Language4/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 0.95/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

65%50%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

College (2008)

Summary: A wild weekend is in store for three high school seniors who visit a local college campus as prospective freshmen.

Release Date: August 29, 2008

Genre: Comedy

Director: Deb Hagan

Writers: Dan Callahan

, Adam Ellison

Runtime: 1 h 34 min

MPAA: R

Production: Element Films, L.I.F.T. Production

Distributor: Lionsgate, MGM Home Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 7,000,000

Domestic: $ 4,694,636

International: $ 1,570,847

Box office:

Budget:$7MDomestic:$4.7MInternational:$1.6MWorldwide:$6.3M

22%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 22% higher than the critics.

5%27%

The Metacritic audience rated this 44% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

15/100

Metacritic User:

59/100

50%6%

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White87.5%Black6.25%Jewish6.25%

0.78

LGBTQ content included:

LGB:

gay, gay kiss, lesbian, male male kiss

QTIA+:

cross dressing

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

Commonsensemedia

Violence2/5
Sex5/5
Language4/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs4/5

Dove

Sex3/5
Language4/5
Violence2/5
Drugs4/5
Nudity3/5
Other3/5

This film gets a 0.78/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

5%27%

Douban:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Chevalier (2015)

Summary: A fishing trip in the Aegean Sea among a sextet of friends becomes the perfect setting for a relentless contest of male dominance. Everything can spark a fierce competition; but, only one can wear the precious chevalier. Who will ...

Release Date: November 26, 2015

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Athina Rachel Tsangari

Writers: Efthimis Filippou

, Athina Rachel Tsangari

Runtime: 1 h 45 min

MPAA: Unrated

Production: Haos Film, Faliro House Productions, Nova, The Match Factory, Greek Film Centre (GFC)

Distributor: Strand Releasing

Countries: Greece, Germany

Language: Greek

Domestic: $ 25,696

International: $ 51,894

Box office:

Domestic:$25.7KInternational:$51.9KWorldwide:$77.6K

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

-33%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -33% lower than the critics.

83%50%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

14%23%

14% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

23% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White76.92%Asian15.38%Latino7.69%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

gay

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

83%50%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

OFDb:

Methodology

Aline (2020)

Summary: With the support of her family and the man she loves, the 14th child of a modest family will become the most famous singer in the world.

Release Date: May 27, 2022

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Musical

Director: Valérie Lemercier

Writers: Brigitte Buc

, Valérie Lemercier

Runtime: 2 h 06 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Rectangle Productions, Gaumont, TF1 Films Production, Belga Productions, Canal+, Ciné+, TF1, Télé Monté Carlo (TMC), TFX, Entourage Pictures, Sacem, NJJ Entertainment, Tuco, Ondamax Films

Distributor: Roadside Attractions, Samuel Goldwyn Films

Countries: France, Canada, Belgium, Spain, United States

Language: French

Movie budget: $ 23,000,000

Domestic: $ 667,815

International: $ 10,482,128

Box office:

Budget:$23MDomestic:$667.8KInternational:$10.5MWorldwide:$11.1M

Adaptation/remake:

based on true story, based on real people

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Gaumont

15%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 15% higher than the critics.

56%71%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

39%6%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White94.12%Latino5.88%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

triple f rated,f rated

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

56%71%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Between the Lines (1977)

Summary: The lives and tribulations of a staff of an independent newspaper in Boston who're struggling financially. Unbeknownst to them, they are about to be taken over by a big publisher; an idea they despise.

Release Date: November 24, 1978

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Joan Micklin Silver

Writers: Fred Barron

, David Helpern

Runtime: 1 h 41 min

MPAA: R

Production: Midwest Films

Distributor: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM), The Criterion Channel, Vestron Video

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 15,383

Box office:

Domestic:$15.4KWorldwide:$15.4K

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

28%11%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White77.78%Jewish11.11%Black5.56%Asian5.56%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

IMDb:

OFDb:

Methodology

Me and You and Everyone We Know (2005)

Summary: A lonely shoe salesman and an eccentric performance artist struggle to connect in this unique take on contemporary life.

Release Date: August 05, 2005

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Miranda July

Writer: Miranda July

Runtime: 1 h 25 min

MPAA: R

Production: IFC Films, FilmFour

Distributor: The Criterion Channel

Countries: United States, United Kingdom

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 800,000

Domestic: $ 3,885,134

International: $ 4,127,704

Box office:

Budget:$800KDomestic:$3.9MInternational:$4.1MWorldwide:$8M

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 2% higher than the critics.

82%84%

The Metacritic audience rated this -2% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

76/100

Metacritic User:

74/100

56%22%

56% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White66.67%Black16.67%Jewish11.11%Latino5.56%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

triple f rated,f rated

BechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

82%84%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

I've Heard the Mermaids Singing (1987)

Summary: Scatterbrained Polly gets a job as a secretary in Gabrielle's art gallery. Polly aspires to be a professional photographer, and idolizes Gabrielle for her artistic ability. When Gabrielle rekindles an old romantic relationship wit...

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Patricia Rozema

Writer: Patricia Rozema

Runtime: 1 h 21 min

MPAA: R

Production: National Film Board of Canada (NFB), Ontario Arts Council, Ontario Film Development Corporation, The Canada Council, Téléfilm Canada

Distributor: Miramax, Buena Vista Home Video, Charter Entertainment, Kino Lorber, Miramax Home Entertainment, Nelson Entertainment, New Line Home Video, The Criterion Channel

Country: Canada

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 362,000

Domestic: $ 1,415,394

Box office:

Budget:$362KDomestic:$1.4MWorldwide:$1.4M

-26%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -26% lower than the critics.

93%67%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

71%14%

71% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

14% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White85.71%Asian14.29%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

lesbian

Possibly woke elements:

triple f rated, f rated

BechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

93%67%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Tokyo Pop (1988)

Summary: Aspiring singer Wendy hops on a plane to Tokyo with dreams of making it big in the music business. She soon finds romance with Hiro, a rock 'n' roll musician who convinces her to become the lead singer in his band.

Release Date: November 05, 1988

Genre: Comedy

Director: Fran Rubel Kuzui

Writers: Lynn Grossman

, Fran Rubel Kuzui

Runtime: 1 h 39 min

MPAA: R

Production: Kuzui Enterprises, Lorimar Film Entertainment

Countries: Japan, United States

Language: Japanese

Domestic: $ 37,834

Box office:

Domestic:$37.8KWorldwide:$37.8K

N/A

The average Rotten Tomatoes audience score is 67%.

67%

The average Metacritic score is 60%.

Metacritic Meta:

60/100

28%82%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

82% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

Asian82.35%White11.76%Jewish5.88%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

67%

IMDb:

Metacritic:

OFDb:

Methodology

Private Life (2018)

Summary: An author is undergoing multiple fertility therapies to get pregnant, putting her relationship with her husband on edge.

Release Date: October 05, 2018

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Tamara Jenkins

Writer: Tamara Jenkins

Runtime: 2 h 03 min

MPAA: R

Production: Likely Story, Netflix

Distributor: Netflix

Country: United States

Language: English

-15%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -15% lower than the critics.

93%78%

The Metacritic audience rated this -5% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

83/100

Metacritic User:

78/100

61%29%

61% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

29% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White70.59%Black17.65%Asian11.76%

0.50

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Role model3/5
Sex5/5
Language4/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs1/5

This film gets a 0.50/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

93%78%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Honk for Jesus. Save Your Soul. (2022)

Summary: In the aftermath of a huge scandal, Trinitie Childs, the first lady of a prominent Southern Baptist Mega Church, attempts to help her pastor-husband, Lee-Curtis Childs, rebuild their congregation.

Release Date: September 02, 2022

Genre: Comedy

Director: Adamma Ebo

Writer: Adamma Ebo

Runtime: 1 h 46 min

MPAA: R

Production: Pinky Promise, 59%, Ejime Productions

Distributor: Universal Pictures Home Entertainment (UPHE)

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 2,561,270

Box office:

Domestic:$2.6MWorldwide:$2.6M

Adaptation/remake:

based on short film

-17%

The Metacritic audience rated this -17% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

63/100

Metacritic User:

46/100

50%94%

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

94% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

Black94.12%White5.88%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Happy Feet (2006)

Summary: Into the world of the Emperor Penguins, who find their soul mates through song, a penguin is born who cannot sing. But he can tap dance something fierce!

Release Date: November 17, 2006

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Animation

Directors: George Miller

, Warren Coleman

, Judy Morris

Writers: George Miller

, John Collee

, Judy Morris

Runtime: 1 h 48 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Warner Bros., Village Roadshow Pictures, Kennedy Miller Productions, Village Roadshow Pictures, Animal Logic, Kingdom Feature Productions

Distributor: Village Roadshow Entertainment, Warner Bros., ABC Family, American Broadcasting Company (ABC), American Movie Classics (AMC), Disney Channel, Freeform, PBS Kids Sprout, Warner Home Video

Countries: United States, Australia

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 100,000,000

Domestic: $ 198,000,317

International: $ 186,335,791

Box office:

Budget:$100MDomestic:$198MInternational:$186.3MWorldwide:$384.3M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Adaptation/remake:

title based on song

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Warner Bros.

-6%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -6% lower than the critics.

76%70%

The Metacritic audience rated this -11% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

77/100

Metacritic User:

66/100

33%19%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

19% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White68.75%Latino18.75%Jewish12.5%

2.00

Possibly woke elements:

prejudice,f rated

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Educational1/5
Message3/5
Role model3/5
Violence2/5
Sex1/5
Language1/5

This film gets a 2.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

76%70%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Pizza (2005)

Summary: A pizza deliveryman develops a bond with a girl nearly half his age.

Genre: Comedy

Director: Mark Christopher

Writer: Mark Christopher

Runtime: 1 h 20 min

MPAA: TV-14

Production: InDigEnt (Independent Digital Entertainment), Process Media

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 5,716

Box office:

Domestic:$5.7KWorldwide:$5.7K

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

50%6%

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White83.33%Jewish11.11%Asian5.56%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

IMDb:

Moviemeter:

Methodology

Lovely & Amazing (2001)

Summary: Self-esteem and insecurity are at the heart of this comedy about the relationship between a mother and her three confused daughters.

Release Date: August 02, 2002

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Nicole Holofcener

Writer: Nicole Holofcener

Runtime: 1 h 31 min

MPAA: R

Production: Blow Up Pictures, Good Machine

Distributor: Lions Gate Films, The Criterion Channel

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 250,000

Domestic: $ 4,222,923

International: $ 454,929

Box office:

Budget:$250KDomestic:$4.2MInternational:$454.9KWorldwide:$4.7M

-23%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -23% lower than the critics.

86%63%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

72%31%

72% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

31% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White68.75%Black12.5%Mixed / Other12.5%Latino6.25%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

gay

Possibly woke elements:

triple f rated, f rated, interracial

BechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

86%63%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Paris Can Wait (2016)

Summary: The wife of a successful movie producer takes a car trip from the south of France to Paris with one of her husband's associates.

Release Date: July 07, 2017

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Eleanor Coppola

Writer: Eleanor Coppola

Runtime: 1 h 32 min

MPAA: G

Production: Lifetime Films, American Zoetrope, Corner Piece Capital, Protagonist Pictures, Tohokushinsha Film Corporation (TFC)

Distributor: Sony Pictures Classics

Countries: United States, United Kingdom, Japan

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 5,000,000

Domestic: $ 5,617,731

International: $ 7,585,810

Box office:

Budget:$5MDomestic:$5.6MInternational:$7.6MWorldwide:$13.2M

Box office International:

Source: Box Office Mojo

-8%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -8% lower than the critics.

47%39%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

61%0%

61% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White100%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

47%39%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Other sources

Parental Guide

Parental Guide: +add

MPAA Certification

No MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?

IMDb Rating

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120707/parentalguide

last updated: 2024-10-26Update data

Commonsensemedia Rating

https://www.commonsensemedia.org

last updated: 2024-09-27Update data

Methodology

Other sources

boxofficemom.com
commonsensemedia.org
crosswalk.com

Global Consensus

OFDb

rating: 6.8/10

douban:

Submit your review:

* required

Critic Name

Enter your name or leave the field blank.

Password

Create a password or enter an existing one. ( Please remember your password or you will lose your username forever. Recovery emails are optional and can be added later in User Settings. )

Review Title

Rating*

Rating is just the typical 5 star rating you'd give the film like you'd see on any other review site.

Support*

Support is a boycott suggestion and is meant to be a way for us to consolidate our efforts in “voting with our dollars.” Obviously, Hollywood has proven that they will sacrifice profits for the sake of their agenda, but they’re not as monolithic as you’d think. And people still respond to incentives.

So the 3 options are:

Pay to watch:

This movie is worth your time, and you should support the creators financially so we get more content like it.

Watch it AND give them money.

Watch if free:

The show is entertaining, but you shouldn’t reward the creators for whatever reason. Perhaps you don't want to support preachy celebs who hate their fans. Or maybe you enjoy superhero movies and nostalgia bait, but don't want to encourage Hollywood to continue making them in such a high ratio.

That’s when you’d click the “Watch Now” button and choose from one of the “Free” links:

( Use at your own risk. ZeitgeistReviews does not endorse any of the links and we don’t condone piracy. And we definitely discourage you from using this Reddit thread that shows you all of the places to pirate movies & tv. )

Watch it BUT don’t give them money.

Skip it:

This means the movie wasn’t even worth your time. Maybe it's so full of Woke crap that you’ll want to pull your hair out half way through. Or it could simply just be a piece of s**t, and not in a "so bad it's good" kind of way.

Don’t watch it AND don’t give them money.

( Note: We have expanded our site from just TV & Movies. Now we have games and will add music/books/etc. So the wording might change but the sentiment is still the same for every "Support" section. )

Review text*

Note: Please wrap spoilers [spoiler] like this. [/spoiler]

Neo-Marxism

Neo-Marxism, (sometimes referred to as "Cultural Marxism"), rates the amount of fanatic egalitarianism in a film. Consider this mainly a rating for anti-nationalist and anti-capitalist themes.

Feminism

Strong and multidimensional female characters are fine. This is mainly referring to girlboss crap, unrealistic Mary Sue content, and/or egregious scenes of manhood being disparaged.

Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action rates how much "diversity" is being pushed. ( Not true diversity, but the anti-White checklist kind.)

Gay Stuff

Gay Stuff rates the amount of non-tradional sexuality depicted.

Fedora Tipping

Fedora Tipping rates the amount of atheism / Scientism™ in a film.

Audience Reviews:

No results found

Critic Reviews:

Submit a review link

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

All movie subreddits All TV subreddits All gaming subreddits

Comments:

Your Name:

Password:

Cancel Comment

Ride

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

Similar Movies:

Parental Guide: +add

IMDb Rating

Commonsensemedia Rating

douban:

Submit your review:

Pay to watch:

Watch if free:

Skip it:

Additional ratings

Audience Reviews:

Critic Reviews:

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

Comments: