The Deceivers

Play Trailer

Summary: Fact-based account of a secret society of murderers, and of the man who exposed them in British India 1825.

Release Date: September 02, 1988

Genres: Adventure, Drama, Crime

Director: Nicholas Meyer

Writers: John Masters

, Michael Hirst

Runtime: 1 h 42 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Merchant Ivory Productions, Michael White Productions, Cinecom Pictures, Film Four International, Master Productions

Distributor: Cinecom Pictures, Kino Lorber, The Criterion Collection, Warner Home Video

Countries: United Kingdom, India

Language: Hindi

Domestic: $ 346,297

Box office:

Domestic:$346.3KWorldwide:$346.3K

Adaptation/remake:

based on true story, based on novel, based on real person

31%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 31% higher than the critics.

33%64%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

22%53%

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

53% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White46.67%Indian26.67%Asian26.67%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

colonialism

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

33%64%

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

Star

Supporting

Other

Production

Race	White	Indian	Asian	Arab	Total	Visuals	Info
Forebears	1	6		1	8
Kairos	4		3		7		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos
Surname	1	1			2		A third party free program that uses US Census data to create an algorithm that analyzes surnames and guesses what ethnicity the person is. Obviously there are issues with this data set such as African Americans who have the last names of their ancestors' slave owner. However, when no other data set is available, this can give a rough estimate and expand the data pool for the less important cast members with no IMDb or TMDb image. Please consider downloading their source code via GitHub to verify the accuracy of our data set, and to peer review our conclusions. Source: https://pypi.org/project/ethnicolr/
Ethnic	1				1		This is the most reliable data source for accurate ethnic breakdowns of famous people. Often the information is crowdsourced by users and they cite all their sources (family trees, obituaries, census archives, etc.) on the bottom of the page. The only issue is converting their ambiguous and inconsistent verdicts into quantifiable variables. Source: https://ethnicelebs.com/
Total	7	7	3	1	18
Cast Percentages	38.89%	38.89%	16.67%	5.56%	100%	{"name":"Cast Percentages","series":[{"name":"White","y":38.89,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":38.89,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":16.67,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":5.56,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}
U.S. Population (1990) Percentage	75.6%	0.33%	2.78%	0.35%		{"name":"U.S. Population (1990)","series":[{"name":"White","y":75.6,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":0.35,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":2.78,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":12.1,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Indian","y":0.33,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Indigenous","y":0.8,"color":"#aaeeee"},{"name":"Latino","y":9,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":3.9,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Jewish","y":2.22,"color":"#ff0066"}],"prefix":""}	Source: US Census (Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (1990) Representation	-36.71	+38.56	+13.89	+5.21		{"name":"U.S. Population (1990)","series":[["White",75.6],["Indian",0.33],["Asian",2.78],["Arab",0.35]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":38.89,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Indian","y":38.89,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Asian","y":16.67,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Arab","y":5.56,"color":"#DF5353"}]}
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Percentage	81.25%		3.5%			{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[{"name":"White","y":6413300000000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":276400000000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":609100000000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":40300000000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":494000000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":60300000000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: Selig Center, University of Georgia
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Representation	-42.36		+13.17			{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[["White",81.25],["Indian",0],["Asian",3.5],["Arab",0]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":38.89,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Indian","y":38.89,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Asian","y":16.67,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Arab","y":5.56,"color":"#DF5353"}]}
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage	80.3%		3.28%			{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":11512968119823,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":469617059136,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":1240577444328,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":87415277592,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":616137480000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":410921156334,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation	-41.41		+13.39			{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[["White",80.3],["Indian",0],["Asian",3.28],["Arab",0]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":38.89,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Indian","y":38.89,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Asian","y":16.67,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Arab","y":5.56,"color":"#DF5353"}]}
World population (1988) Percentage	18.43%	19.83%	35.32%	6.93%		{"name":"World population (1988) ","series":[{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":9895145205,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":28864554732,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":6642767279,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":93485195368,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":51697827572,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":179135553198,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":35164205905,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":100588350496,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":1722246614,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (1988) Representation	+20.46	+19.06	-18.65	-1.37		{"name":"World population (1988) ","series":[["White",18.43],["Indian",19.83],["Asian",35.32],["Arab",6.93]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":38.89,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Indian","y":38.89,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Asian","y":16.67,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Arab","y":5.56,"color":"#DF5353"}]}
World Buying Power Percentage	36.48%	6.94%	29.46%	6.38%		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[{"name":"White","y":3010602822170000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":771525888400000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":91700962050000,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":526264226360000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":174285727610000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":148984454560000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":526400066100000,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":2431392083750000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":572687873900000,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation	+2.41	+31.95	-12.79	-0.82		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[["White",36.48],["Indian",6.94],["Asian",29.46],["Arab",6.38]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":38.89,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Indian","y":38.89,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Asian","y":16.67,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Arab","y":5.56,"color":"#DF5353"}]}
Notes			The US Census considers Pakistani, Sri Lankan, Indian, and Bangladeshi as Asians. At ZR we group Pakistanis with the Arab world. And we group Sri Lankan and Bangladeshi with India because 1.) they are all genetically similar as "South Asians and 2.) there are only a handful of actors from those regions in our database. However, you are viewing the "Asian Alone" category from the US Census when comparing it with Domestic representation. Also note that the 2000 and 2010 estimates include MultiRacial Asians not just "Asian Alone" estimates, and in some categories they include Native Hawaiians as "Asian." So there is a margin of error less than 1% and some inconsistencies with the grouping.	Arab Americans are less than 1% of the US population and often check "White" or "Other" on the US Census. And the only data available for them started when the US Census added ancestry in 1980. So assume a less than 1% margin of error and overlap with the "White" and "Other" categories.

1820s abducted boy abducted child abducted child raised by abductor as their own child altar antihero arm sling arrest attack attempted child strangulation band bandit based on novel based on real person based on true story battle betrayal blackface blood bloodlust blown cover boy brainwashed boy brainwashed child brainwashing breasts brief rear male nudity brigade british british colonialism british east india company british east india company officer british indian army british officer broken arm broken leg brotherhood brotherhood of killers brutal execution brutal murder burial cage camel campfire camping captain change of personality chase child abductor christian man church code word colonel colonial india colonialism consecration cop informant relationship corruption cross cult dance dancer dancing dead body death death cult deep cover digging disguise disguised as someone else disillusioned drink drinking drug trip drug use drum dying east india company east indian company elephant english evil brotherhood evil cult evil cultist evil cultists evil priest excavation exotica fan father in law son in law relationship feast of diwali female nudity female religious zealot fiancee fire fire eater flask frienemies gagged gang of killers gang of serial killers general grave digger greed grieving wife commits suicide gun hallucination hangman's noose hearing voices hindu historical event holy communion honorable man horse horse riding human predator human prey hunt hunting husband cheating on wife husband wife relationship idealist imposter killing the person he is impersonating impostor india infiltration infiltrator informant insane cultist interrogation investigation jealous friend jewel kali character kali statue kali the hindu goddess killer child killer cult killer cultist letter lie loving wife male female relationship marriage engagement mass grave mass murder mass murderer massacre military officer minister mistaken for traitor murder murder cover up muslim naive wife neck breaking omen orchestra owl pedophilic undertones pianist piano pickaxe plot twist police corruption prayer psycho killer raft raja rajah red harring reference to kali the hindu deity religious cult religious zealot religious zealotry rifle ritual ritual murder ritualistic suicide river robbery ruby saber sahib secret society self immolation serial killer group serial murder servant sex scene sex with a prostitute shadow shooting shot in the shoulder singer singing sitar song stabbing statue of kali stomped to death strangled to death strangulation stuffed animal stuffed tiger taxation telescope tent the cult of khali theft thief executed thuggee tiger tiger hunt timeframe 1820s torture traitor trying to stop someone from committing suicide umbrella undercover agent undercover army officer undercover investigation unholy communion vengeance vision vomiting watching execution water pipe wedding wedding ring white lie white man disguised as asian indian white man pretends to be an asian indian

Similar Movies:

The Count of Monte Cristo (2002)

Summary: A young man, falsely imprisoned by his jealous "friend", escapes and uses a hidden treasure to exact his revenge.

Release Date: January 25, 2002

Genres: Action, Adventure, Drama

Director: Kevin Reynolds

Writers: Alexandre Dumas

, Jay Wolpert

Runtime: 2 h 11 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Touchstone Pictures, Spyglass Entertainment, World 2000 Entertainment

Distributor: Buena Vista Home Entertainment

Countries: Ireland, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 35,000,000

Domestic: $ 54,234,062

International: $ 21,160,986

Box office:

Budget:$35MDomestic:$54.2MInternational:$21.2MWorldwide:$75.4M

Adaptation/remake:

foreign language adaptation, based on novel, color remake of black and white film

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Spyglass Entertainment

15%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 15% higher than the critics.

73%88%

The Metacritic audience rated this 24% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

61/100

Metacritic User:

85/100

28%11%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White88.89%Latino11.11%

2.70

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Role model2/5
Violence4/5
Sex2/5
Language2/5
Drugs2/5

Dove

Sex2/5
Language1/5
Violence2/5
Drugs2/5

This film gets a 2.70/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

73%88%

ZR Audience:

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

The Shade Shepherd (2019)

Summary: An adventure set in the late '80s, as a psychiatrist leads his junkie older brother towards the Canadian border to escape a murder charge.

Release Date: October 06, 2020

Genres: Adventure, Drama, Thriller

Director: Chris Faulisi

Writers: Jordon Hodges

, Chris Faulisi

Runtime: 1 h 40 min

MPAA: Not Rated

Production: B2 Entertainment, Sweet Tooth Productions, Oceanus Pictures

Distributor: Lionsgate, Indican Pictures

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 4,409

Box office:

Domestic:$4.4KWorldwide:$4.4K

N/A

The average Rotten Tomatoes audience score is 60%.

60%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

39%6%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White94.12%Asian5.88%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

60%

IMDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

The Seeker: The Dark Is Rising (2007)

Summary: A boy's life is turned upside down when he learns that he is the last of a group of immortal warriors who have dedicated their lives to fighting the forces of the dark.

Release Date: October 05, 2007

Genres: Adventure, Drama, Family

Director: David L. Cunningham

Writers: John Hodge

, Susan Cooper

Runtime: 1 h 39 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Twentieth Century Fox, Walden Media, Marc Platt Productions

Distributor: HBO Max

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 45,000,000

Domestic: $ 8,794,452

International: $ 23,058,167

Box office:

Budget:$45MDomestic:$8.8MInternational:$23.1MWorldwide:$31.9M

Adaptation/remake:

loose adaptation, based on novel

20%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 20% higher than the critics.

13%33%

The Metacritic audience rated this 11% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

38/100

Metacritic User:

49/100

28%0%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White94.12%Jewish5.88%

3.50

Commonsensemedia

Violence3/5
Consumerism3/5
Drugs3/5

Dove

Language1/5
Violence2/5
Drugs1/5
Other1/5

This film gets a 3.50/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

13%33%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

King Arthur (2004)

Summary: A demystified take on the tale of King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table.

Release Date: July 07, 2004

Genres: Action, Adventure, Drama

Director: Antoine Fuqua

Writer: David Franzoni

Runtime: 2 h 06 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Touchstone Pictures, Jerry Bruckheimer Films, Green Hills Productions

Distributor: Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Buena Vista Home Video, Touchstone Home Video

Countries: Ireland, United Kingdom, United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 120,000,000

Domestic: $ 51,882,244

International: $ 151,685,613

Box office:

Budget:$120MDomestic:$51.9MInternational:$151.7MWorldwide:$203.6M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Adaptation/remake:

based on true story, based on book

28%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 28% higher than the critics.

31%59%

The Metacritic audience rated this 32% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

46/100

Metacritic User:

78/100

11%0%

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White100%

3.00

Possibly woke elements:

strong female character,equality,female soldier

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Role model3/5
Violence4/5
Sex2/5
Language2/5
Drugs2/5

Dove

Language2/5
Violence2/5

This film gets a 3.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

31%59%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Wyatt Earp (1994)

Summary: From Wichita to Dodge City, to the O.K. Corral in Tombstone, a man becomes a myth in this thrilling journey of romance, adventure, and desperate heroic action.

Release Date: June 24, 1994

Genres: Adventure, Crime, Biography

Director: Lawrence Kasdan

Writers: Dan Gordon

, Lawrence Kasdan

Runtime: 3 h 11 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Warner Bros., Tig Productions, Kasdan Pictures

Distributor: Warner Home Video, National Broadcasting Company (NBC), HBO Max

Countries: United States, Canada

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 63,000,000

Domestic: $ 25,052,000

Box office:

Budget:$63MDomestic:$25.1MWorldwide:$25.1M

Adaptation/remake:

based on true story

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Warner Bros.

30%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 30% higher than the critics.

31%61%

The Metacritic audience rated this 21% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

47/100

Metacritic User:

68/100

28%6%

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White94.44%Mixed / Other5.56%

1.00

Commonsensemedia

Violence4/5
Sex4/5
Language3/5
Drugs4/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

31%61%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

The Lion King (1994)

Summary: Lion prince Simba and his father are targeted by his bitter uncle, who wants to ascend the throne himself.

Release Date: June 24, 1994

Genres: Adventure, Drama, Animation

Directors: Roger Allers

, Rob Minkoff

Writers: Irene Mecchi

, Jonathan Roberts

, Linda Woolverton

Runtime: 1 h 28 min

MPAA: G

Production: Walt Disney Pictures, Walt Disney Animation Studios, Walt Disney Feature Animation

Distributor: Buena Vista Home Video, Image Entertainment, Walt Disney Home Video, American Broadcasting Company (ABC), Disney Channel, IMAX, Walt Disney Home Entertainment, Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures, Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment, ABC Family, Hotstar

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 45,000,000

Domestic: $ 424,979,720

International: $ 556,728,565

Box office:

Budget:$45MDomestic:$425MInternational:$556.7MWorldwide:$981.7M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Adaptation/remake:

modern day adaptation

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Walt Disney Pictures

Walt Disney Animation Studios

RottenTomatoes:

93%93%

The Metacritic audience rated this 1% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

88/100

Metacritic User:

89/100

39%41%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

41% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White52.94%Black29.41%Mixed / Other5.88%Latino5.88%Jewish5.88%

2.00

Possibly woke elements:

f rated

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Educational1/5
Message4/5
Role model3/5
Violence3/5
Sex1/5
Consumerism3/5

This film gets a 2.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

93%93%

ZR Audience:

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

The Horseman on the Roof (1995)

Summary: In a time of war and disease, a young officer gallantly tries to help a young woman find her husband.

Release Date: June 03, 2003

Genres: Adventure, Drama, Romance

Director: Jean-Paul Rappeneau

Writers: Jean Giono

, Jean-Paul Rappeneau

, Nina Companeez

Runtime: 2 h 15 min

MPAA: R

Production: Hachette Première, Canal+, Centre Européen Cinématographique Rhône-Alpes, France 2 Cinéma

Country: France

Language: French

Domestic: $ 1,320,043

Box office:

Domestic:$1.3MWorldwide:$1.3M

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel

16%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 16% higher than the critics.

65%81%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

39%17%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White83.33%Asian5.56%Latino5.56%Mixed / Other5.56%

N/A

BechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

65%81%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

First Knight (1995)

Summary: Lancelot falls in love with Guinevere, who is due to be married to King Arthur. Meanwhile, a violent warlord tries to seize power from Arthur and his Knights of the Round Table.

Release Date: July 07, 1995

Genres: Action, Adventure, Drama

Director: Jerry Zucker

Writers: Lorne Cameron

, David Hoselton

, William Nicholson

Runtime: 2 h 14 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Columbia Pictures, First Knight Productions, Zucker Brothers Productions

Distributor: American Broadcasting Company (ABC), Columbia TriStar Home Video

Countries: United States, United Kingdom

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 55,000,000

Domestic: $ 37,600,435

International: $ 90,000,000

Box office:

Budget:$55MDomestic:$37.6MInternational:$90MWorldwide:$127.6M

Adaptation/remake:

based on legend

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Columbia Pictures

11%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 11% higher than the critics.

43%54%

The Metacritic audience rated this 13% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

57/100

Metacritic User:

70/100

17%0%

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White100%

2.20

BechdeltestTalk about a man

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Violence3/5
Sex1/5

This film gets a 2.20/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

43%54%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948)

Summary: Two down-on-their-luck Americans searching for work in 1920s Mexico convince an old prospector to help them mine for gold in the Sierra Madre Mountains.

Release Date: January 07, 1948

Genres: Adventure, Drama, Western

Director: John Huston

Writers: John Huston

, B. Traven

Runtime: 2 h 06 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Warner Bros.

Distributor: Dominant Pictures Corporation, Associated Artists Productions (AAP), United Artists Television, Magnetic Video, MGM/UA Entertainment Company, CBS/Fox, Turner Entertainment, Key Video, MGM Home Entertainment, MGM/UA Home Entertainment, Warner Home Video, HBO Max

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 3,000,000

Domestic: $ 5,014,000

Box office:

Budget:$3MDomestic:$5MWorldwide:$5M

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Warner Bros.

-7%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -7% lower than the critics.

100%93%

The Metacritic audience rated this -18% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

98/100

Metacritic User:

80/100

6%35%

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

35% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White64.71%Latino29.41%Asian5.88%

1.45

BechdeltestNo 2 women

Commonsensemedia

Message3/5
Role model2/5
Violence3/5
Sex1/5
Language1/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 1.45/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

100%93%

ZR Audience:

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Deliverance (1972)

Summary: Intent on seeing the Cahulawassee River before it's dammed and turned into a lake, outdoor fanatic Lewis Medlock takes his friends on a canoeing trip they'll never forget into the dangerous American back-country.

Release Date: August 18, 1972

Genres: Adventure, Drama, Thriller

Director: John Boorman

Writers: James Dickey

, John Boorman

Runtime: 1 h 49 min

MPAA: R

Production: Warner Bros., Elmer Enterprises

Distributor: American Broadcasting Company (ABC), National Broadcasting Company (NBC), DiscoVision, RCA (II), Warner Home Video, HBO Max

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 2,000,000

Box office:

Budget:$2MWorldwide:$4.5K

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Warner Bros.

-7%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -7% lower than the critics.

89%82%

The Metacritic audience rated this -3% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

80/100

Metacritic User:

77/100

11%6%

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White93.75%Asian6.25%

1.00

LGBTQ content included:

homosexual

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Message1/5
Violence5/5
Sex2/5
Language3/5
Drugs2/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

89%82%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Mowgli: Legend of the Jungle (2018)

Summary: A human child raised by wolves must face off against a menacing tiger named Shere Khan, as well as his own origins.

Release Date: December 07, 2018

Genres: Adventure, Drama, Fantasy

Director: Andy Serkis

Writers: Callie Kloves

, Rudyard Kipling

Runtime: 1 h 44 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Imaginarium Productions, Warner Bros. Digital Networks, Warner Bros.

Distributor: Warner Bros. Digital Distribution

Countries: United Kingdom, United States

Language: English

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel, based on book

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Warner Bros.

Warner Bros. Digital Networks

-1%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -1% lower than the critics.

52%51%

The Metacritic audience rated this 13% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

51/100

Metacritic User:

64/100

15%43%

15% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

43% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White50%Indian21.43%Mixed / Other14.29%Jewish7.14%Black7.14%

1.95

Commonsensemedia

Message3/5
Role model3/5
Violence4/5
Language1/5
Drugs2/5

This film gets a 1.95/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

52%51%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Mediaversity:

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Khartoum (1966)

Summary: In the Sudan, in 1884 to 1885, Egyptian forces led by British General Charles "Chinese" Gordon (Charlton Heston) defend Khartoum against an invading Muslim Army led by a religious fanatic, Mohammed Ahmed el Mahdi (Sir Laurence Oli...

Release Date: June 15, 1966

Genres: Action, Adventure, Drama

Directors: Basil Dearden

, Eliot Elisofon

Writer: Robert Ardrey

Runtime: 2 h 08 min

MPAA: Approved

Production: Julian Blaustein Productions Ltd.

Distributor: United Artists, MGM Home Entertainment, Twilight Time

Country: United Kingdom

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 6,000,000

Budget:$6M

-35%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -35% lower than the critics.

100%65%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

0%28%

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White72.22%Asian16.67%Arab5.56%Black5.56%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

slave trade,colonialism,imperialism

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

100%65%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Total found: 20

Other sources

Parental Guide: +add

MPAA Certification

No MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?

IMDb Rating

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094979/parentalguide

last updated: 2024-10-26Update data

Commonsensemedia Rating

https://www.commonsensemedia.org

last updated: 2024-09-27Update data

Methodology

Other sources

boxofficemom.com
commonsensemedia.org
crosswalk.com

Kinopoisk

rating: 6.7/10

OFDb

rating: 5.4/10

douban:

Submit your review:

* required

Critic Name

Enter your name or leave the field blank.

Password

Create a password or enter an existing one. ( Please remember your password or you will lose your username forever. Recovery emails are optional and can be added later in User Settings. )

Review Title

Rating*

Rating is just the typical 5 star rating you'd give the film like you'd see on any other review site.

Support*

Support is a boycott suggestion and is meant to be a way for us to consolidate our efforts in “voting with our dollars.” Obviously, Hollywood has proven that they will sacrifice profits for the sake of their agenda, but they’re not as monolithic as you’d think. And people still respond to incentives.

So the 3 options are:

Pay to watch:

This movie is worth your time, and you should support the creators financially so we get more content like it.

Watch it AND give them money.

Watch if free:

The show is entertaining, but you shouldn’t reward the creators for whatever reason. Perhaps you don't want to support preachy celebs who hate their fans. Or maybe you enjoy superhero movies and nostalgia bait, but don't want to encourage Hollywood to continue making them in such a high ratio.

That’s when you’d click the “Watch Now” button and choose from one of the “Free” links:

( Use at your own risk. ZeitgeistReviews does not endorse any of the links and we don’t condone piracy. And we definitely discourage you from using this Reddit thread that shows you all of the places to pirate movies & tv. )

Watch it BUT don’t give them money.

Skip it:

This means the movie wasn’t even worth your time. Maybe it's so full of Woke crap that you’ll want to pull your hair out half way through. Or it could simply just be a piece of s**t, and not in a "so bad it's good" kind of way.

Don’t watch it AND don’t give them money.

( Note: We have expanded our site from just TV & Movies. Now we have games and will add music/books/etc. So the wording might change but the sentiment is still the same for every "Support" section. )

Review text*

Note: Please wrap spoilers [spoiler] like this. [/spoiler]

Neo-Marxism

Neo-Marxism, (sometimes referred to as "Cultural Marxism"), rates the amount of fanatic egalitarianism in a film. Consider this mainly a rating for anti-nationalist and anti-capitalist themes.

Feminism

Strong and multidimensional female characters are fine. This is mainly referring to girlboss crap, unrealistic Mary Sue content, and/or egregious scenes of manhood being disparaged.

Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action rates how much "diversity" is being pushed. ( Not true diversity, but the anti-White checklist kind.)

Gay Stuff

Gay Stuff rates the amount of non-tradional sexuality depicted.

Fedora Tipping

Fedora Tipping rates the amount of atheism / Scientism™ in a film.

Critic Reviews:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

All movie subreddits All TV subreddits All gaming subreddits

Comments:

Your Name:

Password:

Cancel Comment

The Deceivers

Cast

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other Cast, Production

Other cast:

Production:

Representation

Tags / Keywords

Similar Movies

Similar Movies:

Parental Guide

Parental Guide: +add

IMDb Rating

Commonsensemedia Rating

Global Consensus

douban:

Submit your review:

Pay to watch:

Watch if free:

Skip it:

Additional ratings

Critic Reviews:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

Comments: