The Ides of March

RottenTomatoes:

84%73%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

abortion ambiguous ending automobile based on play blackmail blonde blonde woman bus campaign speech campaigning car chevrolet chevrolet malibu chevrolet motor vehicle cincinnati ohio co written by actor cynicism date death of girlfriend death of love interest delegate count directed by star election election campaign endorsement extramarital affair f word fired from a job four word title funeral governor intern intrigue kissing while having sex love interest loyalty male objectification man wears a tank top man wears eyeglasses manager month in title news reporter newspaper headline ohio picket sign political campaign political candidate political thriller politics prescription drug overdose presidential campaign presidential candidate presidential debate presidential election reference to robert klein reference to the new york times screenplay adapted by author sex in bed sex scene tank top title based on shakespeare tv news u.s. car woman wears eyeglasses written and directed by cast member

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

Star

Supporting

Other

Production

Race	White	Jewish	Total	Visuals	Info
Kairos	10		10		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos
Forebears	5		5
Ethnic	1	1	2		This is the most reliable data source for accurate ethnic breakdowns of famous people. Often the information is crowdsourced by users and they cite all their sources (family trees, obituaries, census archives, etc.) on the bottom of the page. The only issue is converting their ambiguous and inconsistent verdicts into quantifiable variables. Source: https://ethnicelebs.com/
Bettaface	1		1		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.betafaceapi.com/demo_old.html
Total	17	1	18
Cast Percentages	94.44%	5.56%	100%	{"name":"Cast Percentages","series":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}
U.S. Population (1980) Percentage	79.6%	2.61%		{"name":"U.S. Population (1980)","series":[{"name":"White","y":79.6,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":0.27,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":1.55,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":11.7,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Indian","y":0.16,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Indigenous","y":0.6,"color":"#aaeeee"},{"name":"Latino","y":6.4,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":3,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Jewish","y":2.61,"color":"#ff0066"}],"prefix":""}	Source: US Census (Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (1980) Representation	+14.84	+2.95		{"name":"U.S. Population (1980)","series":[["White",79.6],["Jewish",2.61]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"}]}
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Percentage	81.25%			{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[{"name":"White","y":6413300000000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":276400000000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":609100000000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":40300000000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":494000000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":60300000000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: Selig Center, University of Georgia
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Representation	+13.19			{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[["White",81.25],["Jewish",0]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"}]}
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage	84.16%			{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":11591272967007,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":250370597518,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":1147035689954,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":62690417687,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":418955264000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":302250973440,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation	+10.28			{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[["White",84.16],["Jewish",0]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"}]}
World population (1983) Percentage	19.42%	0.35%		{"name":"World population (1983) ","series":[{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":8972401686,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":26485532720,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":5968516605,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":90217175203,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":45471161104,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":165607414139,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":30640127163,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":89651371916,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":1626517643,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (1983) Representation	+75.02	+5.21		{"name":"World population (1983) ","series":[["White",19.42],["Jewish",0.35]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"}]}
World Buying Power Percentage	36.48%	1.11%		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[{"name":"White","y":3010602822170000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":771525888400000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":91700962050000,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":526264226360000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":174285727610000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":148984454560000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":526400066100000,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":2431392083750000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":572687873900000,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation	+57.96	+4.45		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[["White",36.48],["Jewish",1.11]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":94.44,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"}]}
Notes		If there were any inconsistencies with percentages calculated using our Census data, the Jewish Data Bank percentages were the ones used. Also please review the Jewish Data Bank pdf to understand the difference between the "Core" Jewish population and the "Extended" / "Law of Return" Jewish populations. We are displaying the "Core" Jewish populations since that is what the Jewish Data Bank and Wikipedia articles chose. Also, the 1942 population estimates were used for the 1940 row. For the 2000 estimates, the "Core" definition was not used, so we used the 5.2 mil broader estimate instead of the 4.3 mil estimate since the 5.2 broader estimate seemed too drastic of a drop and the definitions weren't congruent with Core and Law of Return.

Similar Movies:

Heaven Can Wait (1978)

Summary: A Los Angeles Rams quarterback, accidentally taken away from his body by an overanxious angel before he was meant to die, returns to life in the body of a recently murdered millionaire.

Release Date: June 28, 1978

Genres: Comedy, Fantasy, Romance

Directors: Warren Beatty

, Buck Henry

Writers: Elaine May

, Warren Beatty

, Harry Segall

Runtime: 1 h 41 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Paramount Pictures

Distributor: Paramount Pictures, DiscoVision, American Broadcasting Company (ABC), Paramount Home Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 6,000,000

Domestic: $ 81,640,278

Box office:

Budget:$6MDomestic:$81.6MWorldwide:$81.6M

Adaptation/remake:

based on play, based on a play, remake

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Paramount Pictures

-19%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -19% lower than the critics.

87%68%

Metacritic audience rated it equally with the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

72/100

Metacritic User:

72/100

22%6%

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White76.47%Jewish17.65%Asian5.88%

1.45

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Role model3/5
Violence1/5
Sex1/5
Language3/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs1/5

This film gets a 1.45/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

RottenTomatoes:

87%68%

ZR Audience:

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Inside Out (2015)

Summary: After young Riley is uprooted from her Midwest life and moved to San Francisco, her emotions - Joy, Fear, Anger, Disgust and Sadness - conflict on how best to navigate a new city, house, and school.

Release Date: June 19, 2015

Genres: Adventure, Comedy, Animation

Directors: Pete Docter

, Ronnie Del Carmen

Writers: Pete Docter

, Ronnie Del Carmen

, Meg LeFauve

Runtime: 1 h 35 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Pixar Animation Studios, Walt Disney Pictures

Distributor: Fathom Events, Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment, Disney Channel, Disney Junior, Disney XD, Freeform, American Broadcasting Company (ABC), Disney+, FX Network

Country: United States

Language: English

Franchise: Inside Out

Movie budget: $ 175,000,000

Domestic: $ 356,461,711

International: $ 502,614,543

Box office:

Budget:$175MDomestic:$356.5MInternational:$502.6MWorldwide:$859.1M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Franchise:

Inside Out

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Walt Disney Pictures

Pixar Animation Studios

-9%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -9% lower than the critics.

98%89%

The Metacritic audience rated this -8% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

94/100

Metacritic User:

86/100

39%11%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White66.67%Jewish22.22%Latino5.56%Indian5.56%

3.50

Possibly woke elements:

strong female character

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Educational2/5
Message5/5
Role model4/5
Violence2/5
Sex1/5
Language1/5
Consumerism1/5

Dove

Sex1/5
Language1/5
Violence1/5
Nudity1/5
Other2/5

This film gets a 3.50/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

RottenTomatoes:

98%89%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

An Education (2009)

Summary: A coming-of-age story about a teenage girl in 1960s suburban London, and how her life changes with the arrival of a playboy nearly twice her age.

Release Date: February 05, 2010

Genre: Drama

Director: Lone Scherfig

Writers: Lynn Barber

, Nick Hornby

Runtime: 1 h 40 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: BBC Films, Finola Dwyer Productions, Wildgaze Films, Endgame Entertainment, An Education Distribution, Odyssey Entertainment

Distributor: Sony Pictures Classics, HBO Max, Sony Pictures Home Entertainment

Countries: United Kingdom, United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 7,500,000

Domestic: $ 12,574,914

International: $ 13,521,938

Box office:

Budget:$7.5MDomestic:$12.6MInternational:$13.5MWorldwide:$26.1M

-13%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -13% lower than the critics.

93%80%

The Metacritic audience rated this -9% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

85/100

Metacritic User:

76/100

56%6%

56% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White94.44%Latino5.56%

1.00

Possibly woke elements:

class differences,f rated

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message2/5
Role model2/5
Sex3/5
Language2/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs2/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

RottenTomatoes:

93%80%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Limitless (2011)

Summary: A mysterious pill that enables the user to access 100% of his brain's abilities transforms a struggling writer into a financial wizard, but it also puts him in a new world with many dangers.

Release Date: March 18, 2011

Genres: Thriller, Sci-Fi

Director: Neil Burger

Writers: Leslie Dixon

, Alan Glynn

Runtime: 1 h 45 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Relativity Media, Virgin Produced, Rogue, Intermedia

Distributor: Relativity Media, Rogue, 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, American Broadcasting Company (ABC), TNT

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 27,000,000

Domestic: $ 79,249,455

International: $ 82,600,000

Box office:

Budget:$27MDomestic:$79.2MInternational:$82.6MWorldwide:$161.8M

Adaptation/remake:

based on novel

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 5% higher than the critics.

69%74%

The Metacritic audience rated this 5% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

59/100

Metacritic User:

64/100

44%17%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White83.33%Mixed / Other11.11%Asian5.56%

1.00

Possibly woke elements:

interracial

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Violence4/5
Sex3/5
Language3/5
Drugs5/5

Dove

Sex3/5
Language4/5
Violence3/5
Drugs3/5
Nudity2/5
Other2/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

RottenTomatoes:

69%74%

ZR Audience:

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

based on true story, based on book, based on real person, based on memoir

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

The Theory of Everything (2014)

Summary: Stephen Hawking gets unprecedented success in the field of physics despite being diagnosed with motor neuron disease at the age of 21. He defeats awful odds as his first wife Jane aids him loyally.

Release Date: November 26, 2014

Genres: Drama, Romance, Biography

Director: James Marsh

Writers: Anthony McCarten

, Jane Hawking

Runtime: 2 h 03 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Working Title Films, Dentsu Motion Pictures, Fuji Television Network

Distributor: Focus Features

Countries: United Kingdom, Japan, United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 15,000,000

Domestic: $ 35,893,537

International: $ 87,833,151

Box office:

Budget:$15MDomestic:$35.9MInternational:$87.8MWorldwide:$123.7M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Adaptation/remake:

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Working Title Films

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 4% higher than the critics.

80%84%

The Metacritic audience rated this 7% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

71/100

Metacritic User:

78/100

39%0%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White100%

1.99

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message3/5
Role model3/5
Violence1/5
Sex2/5
Language1/5
Drugs1/5

Dove

Sex3/5
Language2/5
Violence1/5
Drugs2/5
Nudity2/5
Other2/5

This film gets a 1.99/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

RottenTomatoes:

80%84%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Ocean's Eleven (2001)

Summary: Danny Ocean, a gangster, rounds up a gang of associates to stage a sophisticated and elaborate casino heist which involves robbing three Las Vegas casinos simultaneously during a popular boxing event.

Release Date: December 07, 2001

Genres: Crime, Thriller

Director: Steven Soderbergh

Writers: George Clayton Johnson

, Jack Golden Russell

, Harry Brown

Runtime: 1 h 56 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Warner Bros., Village Roadshow Pictures, NPV Entertainment, WV Films II

Distributor: Warner Home Video, CBS, HBO Max

Country: United States

Language: English

Franchise: Ocean's 11

Movie budget: $ 85,000,000

Domestic: $ 183,417,150

International: $ 267,300,000

Box office:

Budget:$85MDomestic:$183.4MInternational:$267.3MWorldwide:$450.7M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Franchise:

Ocean's 11

Adaptation/remake:

remake

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Warner Bros.

-3%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -3% lower than the critics.

83%80%

The Metacritic audience rated this 12% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

74/100

Metacritic User:

86/100

22%17%

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

17% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White72.22%Jewish11.11%Black11.11%Latino5.56%

1.00

Possibly woke elements:

racism

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Message1/5
Role model2/5
Violence2/5
Sex2/5
Language2/5
Consumerism3/5
Drugs2/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

RottenTomatoes:

83%80%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

based on novel, based on book

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

The Pelican Brief (1993)

Summary: A law student uncovers a conspiracy, putting herself and others in danger.

Release Date: December 17, 1993

Genres: Drama, Crime, Mystery

Director: Alan J. Pakula

Writers: John Grisham

, Alan J. Pakula

Runtime: 2 h 21 min

MPAA: PG-13

Production: Warner Bros.

Distributor: Warner Home Video, CBS, Hotstar, HBO Max

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 45,000,000

Domestic: $ 100,768,056

International: $ 94,500,000

Box office:

Budget:$45MDomestic:$100.8MInternational:$94.5MWorldwide:$195.3M

Adaptation/remake:

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Warner Bros.

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 7% higher than the critics.

54%61%

The Metacritic audience rated this 20% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

51/100

Metacritic User:

71/100

11%6%

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White77.78%Jewish16.67%Black5.56%

2.00

LGBTQ content included:

gay, homosexual

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Violence3/5
Sex3/5
Language3/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 2.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

RottenTomatoes:

54%61%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Her (2013)

Summary: In the near future, a lonely writer develops an unlikely relationship with an operating system designed to meet his every need.

Release Date: January 10, 2014

Genres: Drama, Romance, Sci-Fi

Director: Spike Jonze

Writer: Spike Jonze

Runtime: 2 h 06 min

MPAA: R

Production: Annapurna Pictures, Stage 6 Films

Distributor: Warner Bros., Warner Home Video

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 23,000,000

Domestic: $ 25,568,251

International: $ 22,701,018

Box office:

Budget:$23MDomestic:$25.6MInternational:$22.7MWorldwide:$48.3M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Stage 6 Films

-12%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -12% lower than the critics.

94%82%

The Metacritic audience rated this -5% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

91/100

Metacritic User:

86/100

44%12%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

12% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White64.71%Jewish23.53%Latino5.88%Black5.88%

1.03

BechdeltestTalk about a man

Commonsensemedia

Message4/5
Role model3/5
Violence1/5
Sex3/5
Language4/5
Drugs1/5

Dove

Sex4/5
Language4/5
Violence1/5
Drugs2/5
Nudity4/5
Other3/5

This film gets a 1.03/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

RottenTomatoes:

94%82%

ZR Audience:

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

lesbian, lesbian interest

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

The Neon Demon (2016)

Summary: An aspiring model, Jesse, is new to Los Angeles. However, her beauty and youth, which generate intense fascination and jealousy within the fashion industry, may prove themselves sinister.

Release Date: June 24, 2016

Genres: Thriller, Horror

Director: Nicolas Winding Refn

Writers: Nicolas Winding Refn

, Mary Laws

, Polly Stenham

Runtime: 1 h 57 min

MPAA: 18A

Production: Space Rocket Nation, Vendian Entertainment, Bold Films, Danmarks Radio (DR)

Distributor: Amazon Studios, Wild Bunch

Countries: United States, Belgium, Denmark, France

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 7,000,000

Domestic: $ 1,333,124

International: $ 1,740,576

Box office:

Budget:$7MDomestic:$1.3MInternational:$1.7MWorldwide:$3.1M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

-7%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -7% lower than the critics.

58%51%

The Metacritic audience rated this -6% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

51/100

Metacritic User:

45/100

72%18%

72% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

18% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White70.59%Jewish11.76%Latino5.88%Arab5.88%Mixed / Other5.88%

1.00

LGBTQ content included:

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message1/5
Violence5/5
Sex5/5
Language4/5
Drugs1/5

Dove

Sex3/5
Language4/5
Violence4/5
Drugs2/5
Nudity5/5
Other5/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

RottenTomatoes:

58%51%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Dolls (1986)

Summary: A dysfunctional family of three stop by a mansion during a storm -- father, stepmother, and child. The child discovers that the elderly owners are magical toy makers and have a haunted collection of dolls.

Release Date: May 29, 1987

Genre: Horror

Director: Stuart Gordon

Writer: Ed Naha

Runtime: 1 h 17 min

MPAA: R

Production: Empire Pictures, Taryn Productions Inc.

Distributor: MGM Home Entertainment, Scream Factory, Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, The Sci-Fi Channel, Tubi TV, Vestron Television, Vestron Video

Countries: United States, Italy

Language: English

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

63%0%

63% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White100%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Add Comment

Write a Review

Submit Review Link

Edit Family Friendly Rating

Total found: 38

Other sources

Parental Guide: +add

This film gets a 0.95/5 family friendly score

MPAA Certification	No MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?
IMDb Rating https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1124035/parentalguide last updated: 2024-10-26Update data
Commonsensemedia Rating https://www.commonsensemedia.org/movie-reviews/the-ides-of-march last updated: 2024-10-26Update data
Message 0/5	The movie is a pretty jaded look at the political and electoral process. If there's any positive message, it's that if you sacrifice your principles, you lose a piece of yourself.
Role model 2/5	One of the main characters is a politician who says what he thinks and does what he says. It's inspiring to hear him speak (even if he's just a movie character) because he's candid and devoted to the idea of social justice and service. His assistant also believes in him for this reason.
Violence 2/5	Verbal clashes are so stinging that they stun. A woman commits suicide.
Sex 2/5	Two colleagues sleep together; the audience sees close-up camera shots that hint at nudity, but no sensitive body parts are shown. Sexual banter. A liaison between a married man and a woman who works for him is discussed, and its unintended consequence has to be undone.
Language 4/5	Frequent use of strong words such as "f--k," "d--k," "a--hole," "s--t," "prick," "c--k," "t-ts," "hell," "crap," "damn," "goddamn," and more.
Consumerism 1/5	Logos for Nokia and GMC are visible.
Drugs 2/5	Social drinking by adults in bars; references to drugs, being drunk, and overdosing.
Dove Rating https://dove.org/review/9027-the-ides-of-march/
Faith 0/5	None
Sex 4/5	Strong sexual remarks and sex outside of marriage; a scene in which a couple is obviously having sex although not graphic; a couple breathes heavy during sex.
Language 5/5	GD-4; J/JC-3; F-69 (5 used sexually); S-25; A-4; H-2; D-1; Crap-1; Slang for male genitalia-4; Slang for breasts-1; Ccsuckers-1
Violence 1/5	Disagreements between characters; a candidate against the death penalty says he would kill a man who killed his wife but would be wrong and should be punished by being placed in prison.
Drugs 3/5	Several scenes of beer drinking; guys talk about grabbing a beer; one character smokes cigarettes several times; a man jokes and asks another man if he is "stoned"; a man jokes about getting Quaaludes; a woman's dead body is seen and it's stated she died from a mixture of alcohol and overdose of prescription drugs.
Nudity 2/5	Cleavage; shirtless man.
Other 2/5	It is stated that homosexuality should be viewed as a civil rights issue, not a religious one; a woman goes to an abortion clinic and has an abortion, which is paid for by the funds of a presidential candidate; lies are told to further politics and there are cover-ups.