The Motel

Summary: Thirteen-year-old Ernest Chin lives and works at a sleazy hourly-rate motel on a strip of desolate suburban bi-way. Misunderstood by his family and blindly careening into puberty, Ernest befriends Sam Kim, a self-destructive yet c...

Release Date: January 24, 2005

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Michael Kang

Writers: Michael Kang

, Ed Lin

Runtime: 1 h 15 min

MPAA: Not Rated

Production: Flan de Coco Films

Distributor: ImaginAsian Pictures, Palm Pictures

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 51,540

Box office:

Domestic:$51.5KWorldwide:$51.5K

-24%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -24% lower than the critics.

88%64%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

39%44%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White56.25%Asian37.5%Latino6.25%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

88%64%

Douban:

IMDb:

OFDb:

Methodology

Cast

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other Cast, Production

Other cast:

Production:

Representation

Star

Supporting

Other

Production

Race	White	Asian	Latino	Indian	Total	Visuals	Info
Forebears	7	3		1	11
Kairos	2	3	1		6		A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like. Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos
Ethnic		1			1		This is the most reliable data source for accurate ethnic breakdowns of famous people. Often the information is crowdsourced by users and they cite all their sources (family trees, obituaries, census archives, etc.) on the bottom of the page. The only issue is converting their ambiguous and inconsistent verdicts into quantifiable variables. Source: https://ethnicelebs.com/
Total	9	7	1	1	18
Cast Percentages	50%	38.89%	5.56%	5.56%	100%	{"name":"Cast Percentages","series":[{"name":"White","y":50,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":38.89,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}
U.S. Population (2000) Percentage	69.1%	4.23%	12.5%	0.6%		{"name":"U.S. Population (2000)","series":[{"name":"White","y":69.1,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":0.42,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":4.23,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":12.3,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Indian","y":0.6,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Indigenous","y":0.9,"color":"#aaeeee"},{"name":"Latino","y":12.5,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":3.96,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Jewish","y":1.85,"color":"#ff0066"}],"prefix":""}	Source: US Census (Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (2000) Representation	-19.1	+34.66	-6.94	+4.96		{"name":"U.S. Population (2000)","series":[["White",69.1],["Asian",4.23],["Latino",12.5],["Indian",0.6]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":50,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Asian","y":38.89,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"}]}
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Percentage	81.25%	3.5%	6.26%			{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[{"name":"White","y":6413300000000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":276400000000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":609100000000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":40300000000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":494000000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":60300000000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: Selig Center, University of Georgia
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Representation	-31.25	+35.39	-0.7			{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[["White",81.25],["Asian",3.5],["Latino",6.26],["Indian",0]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":50,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Asian","y":38.89,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"}]}
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage	75.87%	5.15%	6.17%			{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":12718864679181,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":863662829574,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":1524222662869,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":118862444126,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":1034308096500,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":504305695765,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation	-25.87	+33.74	-0.61			{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[["White",75.87],["Asian",5.15],["Latino",6.17],["Indian",0]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":50,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Asian","y":38.89,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"}]}
World population (2005) Percentage	15.78%	33.46%	5.73%	21.48%		{"name":"World population (2005) ","series":[{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":12059233362,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":37152006149,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":8921391088,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":102383610376,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":78238938078,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":217077547173,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":51316658810,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":139376519734,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":2191204385,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (2005) Representation	+34.22	+5.43	-0.17	-15.92		{"name":"World population (2005) ","series":[["White",15.78],["Asian",33.46],["Latino",5.73],["Indian",21.48]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":50,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Asian","y":38.89,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"}]}
World Buying Power Percentage	36.48%	29.46%	9.35%	6.94%		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[{"name":"White","y":3010602822170000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":771525888400000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":91700962050000,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":526264226360000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":174285727610000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":148984454560000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":526400066100000,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":2431392083750000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":572687873900000,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation	+13.52	+9.43	-3.79	-1.38		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[["White",36.48],["Asian",29.46],["Latino",9.35],["Indian",6.94]],"cast":[{"name":"White","y":50,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Asian","y":38.89,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Latino","y":5.56,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"}]}
Notes		The US Census considers Pakistani, Sri Lankan, Indian, and Bangladeshi as Asians. At ZR we group Pakistanis with the Arab world. And we group Sri Lankan and Bangladeshi with India because 1.) they are all genetically similar as "South Asians and 2.) there are only a handful of actors from those regions in our database. However, you are viewing the "Asian Alone" category from the US Census when comparing it with Domestic representation. Also note that the 2000 and 2010 estimates include MultiRacial Asians not just "Asian Alone" estimates, and in some categories they include Native Hawaiians as "Asian." So there is a margin of error less than 1% and some inconsistencies with the grouping.	Many Latinos check "White" or "Other" on the Census. So this overlaps with "Mixed" race and "White." Also, when there was a discrepancy with the percentage listed on the Wikipedia table and our calculated numbers, the Wiki table's numbers were used. Likewise, when the population total was missing from the Census pdf, the estimate was calculated using the percentage from the Wiki table. NOTE: It turns out that the reason America doesn't have a separate "Latino" race is because the League of Latin American Citizens protested against discrimination towards Mexicans and got themselves to legally be considered "White." Check the research links in our Google Doc for more info.

Tags / Keywords

absent father asian american bully chinese american coming of age crush female nudity friendship between men independent film korean american liar male female relationship male full frontal nudity male nudity motel mother son relationship puberty

Similar Movies

Similar Movies:

Whole New Thing (2005)

Summary: After years of being home schooled by hippie parents, Emerson is enrolled at his local high school. The intelligent and androgynous youth confounds his classmates and captures the attention of his English teacher. The teacher-stud...

Release Date: September 12, 2005

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Amnon Buchbinder

Writers: Amnon Buchbinder

, Daniel MacIvor

Runtime: 1 h 32 min

MPAA: 14A

Production: Acuity Pictures Production, Chum Television, Nova Scotia Film Development Corporation, Palpable Productions, The Movie Network (TMN), Whole Thing Productions Inc.

Distributor: Picture This! Entertainment

Country: Canada

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 750,000

Domestic: $ 11,445

Box office:

Budget:$750KDomestic:$11.4KWorldwide:$11.4K

-1%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -1% lower than the critics.

64%63%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

50%0%

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White100%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

LGB:

gay, homosexual, gay crush, gay character, gay sex

QTIA+:

queer, gay teenager, queer cinema

Possibly woke elements:

gay bashing

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

64%63%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Choke (2008)

Summary: A sex-addicted con-man pays for his mother's hospital bills by playing on the sympathies of those who rescue him from choking to death.

Release Date: October 30, 2008

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Clark Gregg

Writers: Clark Gregg

, Chuck Palahniuk

Runtime: 1 h 32 min

MPAA: R

Production: Searchlight Pictures, ATO Pictures, Contrafilm, Aramid Entertainment Fund, Dune Entertainment III, Choke Film, Fox Searchlight Pictures

Distributor: Twentieth Century Fox, Searchlight Pictures, 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 3,000,000

Domestic: $ 2,926,565

International: $ 1,055,894

Box office:

Budget:$3MDomestic:$2.9MInternational:$1.1MWorldwide:$4M

Production:

Searchlight Pictures

(Walt Disney Studios subsidiary)

-4%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -4% lower than the critics.

56%52%

The Metacritic audience rated this 43% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

47/100

Metacritic User:

90/100

61%28%

61% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

28% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White55.56%Black16.67%Jewish16.67%Mixed / Other11.11%

0.10

Possibly woke elements:

colonialism

Commonsensemedia

Violence3/5
Sex5/5
Language5/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 0.10/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

56%52%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Roger Dodger (2002)

Summary: After breaking up with his lover and boss, a smooth-talking man takes his teenaged nephew out on the town in search of sex.

Release Date: November 22, 2002

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Dylan Kidd

Writer: Dylan Kidd

Runtime: 1 h 46 min

MPAA: R

Production: Holedigger Films, Roger Dodger LLC

Distributor: Tubi TV

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 1,266,828

International: $ 667,669

Box office:

Domestic:$1.3MInternational:$667.7KWorldwide:$1.9M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

-12%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -12% lower than the critics.

88%76%

The Metacritic audience rated this 3% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

75/100

Metacritic User:

78/100

56%24%

56% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

24% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White52.94%Jewish23.53%Latino17.65%Mixed / Other5.88%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

sexism

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

88%76%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Taking Woodstock (2009)

Summary: A man working at his parents' motel in the Catskills inadvertently sets in motion the generation-defining concert in the summer of 1969.

Release Date: August 28, 2009

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Biography

Director: Ang Lee

Writers: James Schamus

, Elliot Tiber

, Tom Monte

Runtime: 2 h 00 min

MPAA: R

Production: Focus Features

Distributor: Focus Features, Universal Pictures Home Entertainment (UPHE)

Countries: United States, Taiwan

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 30,000,000

Domestic: $ 7,460,204

International: $ 2,515,533

Box office:

Budget:$30MDomestic:$7.5MInternational:$2.5MWorldwide:$10M

Adaptation/remake:

based on true story, based on book, based on memoir

Production:

Focus Features

(NBCUniversal subsidiary)

-1%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -1% lower than the critics.

48%47%

The Metacritic audience rated this 11% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

55/100

Metacritic User:

66/100

33%11%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White66.67%Jewish22.22%Latino5.56%Asian5.56%

0.95

LGBTQ content included:

LGB:

gay son, gay, homosexual, gay kiss

QTIA+:

cross dressing

Possibly woke elements:

prejudice, feminism

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Message3/5
Role model3/5
Violence2/5
Sex3/5
Language4/5
Drugs4/5

This film gets a 0.95/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

48%47%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Law of Desire (1987)

Summary: A gay filmmaker becomes involved with an obsessive fan while still pining for his absent true love. Meanwhile, he shares a close but complex relationship with his trans sister, an actress.

Release Date: March 05, 1987

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Thriller

Director: Pedro Almodóvar

Writer: Pedro Almodóvar

Runtime: 1 h 42 min

MPAA: R

Production: El Deseo, Laurenfilm

Distributor: Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE)

Country: Spain

Language: Spanish

Domestic: $ 72,442

International: $ 28,124

Box office:

Domestic:$72.4KInternational:$28.1KWorldwide:$100.6K

-18%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -18% lower than the critics.

100%82%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

44%75%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

75% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

Latino62.5%White25%Mixed / Other12.5%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

LGB:

gay, homosexual, gay character, lesbian, lgbt, homoeroticism, gay protagonist

QTIA+:

transgender, queer

BechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

100%82%

Douban:

IMDb:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Slums of Beverly Hills (1998)

Summary: In 1976, a lower-middle-class teenager struggles to cope living with her neurotic family of nomads on the outskirts of Beverly Hills.

Release Date: September 11, 1998

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Tamara Jenkins

Writer: Tamara Jenkins

Runtime: 1 h 31 min

MPAA: R

Production: Searchlight Pictures, Wildwood Enterprises, Fox Searchlight Pictures

Distributor: 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 5,000,000

Domestic: $ 5,502,773

Box office:

Budget:$5MDomestic:$5.5MWorldwide:$5.5M

Production:

Searchlight Pictures

(Walt Disney Studios subsidiary)

-13%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -13% lower than the critics.

81%68%

The Metacritic audience rated this 8% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

68/100

Metacritic User:

76/100

44%6%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White66.67%Jewish27.78%Mixed / Other5.56%

1.00

Possibly woke elements:

triple f rated,f rated,racism

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Violence2/5
Sex4/5
Language3/5
Drugs3/5

This film gets a 1.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

81%68%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Wokeness

Thecherrypicks:

Methodology

Jo Jo Dancer, Your Life Is Calling (1986)

Summary: After severely burning himself in a drug incident, a comedian has a near death experience in which he reviews his life.

Release Date: May 02, 1986

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Biography

Director: Richard Pryor

Writers: Rocco Urbisci

, Paul Mooney

, Richard Pryor

Runtime: 1 h 37 min

MPAA: R

Production: Columbia Pictures, Delphi V Productions

Distributor: The Criterion Channel

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 14,000,000

Domestic: $ 18,034,150

Box office:

Budget:$14MDomestic:$18MWorldwide:$18M

Adaptation/remake:

based on true story

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Columbia Pictures

29%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 29% higher than the critics.

50%79%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

50%67%

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

67% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

Black61.11%White33.33%Mixed / Other5.56%

N/A

Possibly woke elements:

race relations

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

50%79%

IMDb:

OFDb:

Methodology

Carnages (2002)

Summary: After a bull dies in an arena, its remains are transported throughout Belgium, France, and Spain, where various characters cross its path.

Release Date: November 13, 2002

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Delphine Gleize

Writer: Delphine Gleize

Runtime: 2 h 10 min

MPAA: Unrated

Production: Balthazar Productions, France 3 Cinéma, Need Productions, PCT Cinéma & Télévision S.A., Radio Télévision Belge Francophone (RTBF), StudioCanal, Télévision Suisse-Romande (TSR)

Distributor: Wellspring Media

Countries: France, Belgium, Spain, Switzerland

Language: English

Domestic: $ 60,158

International: $ 38,891

Box office:

Domestic:$60.2KInternational:$38.9KWorldwide:$99K

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 3% higher than the critics.

78%81%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

39%19%

39% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

19% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White81.25%Latino18.75%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

lesbian

Possibly woke elements:

polygamy, f rated

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

78%81%

Douban:

IMDb:

OFDb:

Methodology

Another Happy Day (2011)

Summary: A wedding at her parents' Annapolis estate hurls high-strung Lynn into the center of touchy family dynamics.

Release Date: December 08, 2011

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Sam Levinson

Writer: Sam Levinson

Runtime: 1 h 59 min

MPAA: R

Production: Charter Management, Cineric, Filmula, New Mexico Media Partners, Prop Blast Films, Taggart Productions

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 4,000,000

Domestic: $ 8,464

International: $ 651,473

Box office:

Budget:$4MDomestic:$8.5KInternational:$651.5KWorldwide:$659.9K

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

-3%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -3% lower than the critics.

47%44%

The Metacritic audience rated this 6% higher than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

60/100

Metacritic User:

66/100

44%0%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White83.33%Jewish16.67%

0.65

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message1/5
Role model1/5
Violence2/5
Sex4/5
Language4/5
Consumerism1/5
Drugs4/5

This film gets a 0.65/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

47%44%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

OFDb:

Methodology

Sammy and Rosie Get Laid (1987)

Summary: Sammy and Rosie are an unconventional couple. They live amid chaos, surround themselves with intellectual street people, and sleep with everybody except each other. Things become interesting when Sammy's father visits.

Release Date: October 30, 1987

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Stephen Frears

Writer: Hanif Kureishi

Runtime: 1 h 41 min

Production: Channel Four Films, Working Title Films

Distributor: Cinecom Pictures, Evergreen Entertainment, Lorimar Home Video, October Films

Country: United Kingdom

Language: English

Domestic: $ 1,196,336

Box office:

Domestic:$1.2MWorldwide:$1.2M

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Working Title Films

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 8% higher than the critics.

75%83%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

56%38%

56% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

38% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White56.25%Black12.5%Indian12.5%Asian6.25%Latino6.25%Jewish6.25%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

lesbian

Possibly woke elements:

feminist, interracial, interracial relationship, colonialism

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

75%83%

IMDb:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

24 Hour Party People (2002)

Summary: In 1976, Tony Wilson sets up Factory Records and brings Manchester's music to the world.

Release Date: September 20, 2002

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Biography

Director: Michael Winterbottom

Writer: Frank Cottrell Boyce

Runtime: 1 h 57 min

MPAA: R

Production: Revolution Films, Baby Cow Productions, The Film Consortium, Wave Pictures, Channel Four Films, United Artists

Distributor: MGM Home Entertainment, MVD Visual

Country: United Kingdom

Language: English

Domestic: $ 1,184,096

International: $ 1,618,803

Box office:

Domestic:$1.2MInternational:$1.6MWorldwide:$2.8M

Adaptation/remake:

based on true story, title based on song

Possible Big Business:

Production:

United Artists

RottenTomatoes:

87%87%

The Metacritic audience rated this -2% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

85/100

Metacritic User:

83/100

6%11%

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White88.89%Mixed / Other5.56%Black5.56%

0.10

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Violence3/5
Sex4/5
Language4/5
Drugs5/5

This film gets a 0.10/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

87%87%

Douban:

IMDb:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Diamantino (2018)

Summary: A fallen soccer superstar vows to adopt a refugee child, while becoming the naive unwitting centerpiece in in a bizarre plot to Make Portugal Great Again.

Release Date: November 28, 2018

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Fantasy

Directors: Gabriel Abrantes

, Daniel Schmidt

Writers: Gabriel Abrantes

, Daniel Schmidt

Runtime: 1 h 36 min

MPAA: PG

Production: Maria & Mayer, Les Films du Bélier, Syndrome Films

Distributor: The Criterion Channel

Countries: Portugal, France, Brazil

Language: Portuguese

Domestic: $ 70,088

International: $ 164,953

Box office:

Domestic:$70.1KInternational:$165KWorldwide:$235K

-26%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -26% lower than the critics.

86%60%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

47%46%

47% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

46% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White53.85%Latino30.77%Black15.38%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

LGB:

gay, lesbian, lgbt

QTIA+:

queer, lgbt interest

BechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

86%60%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

OFDb:

Methodology

Judy Berlin (1999)

Summary: A lonely, talented teacher enjoys a flirtation with the (married) principal of the school, who returns her affections but is hampered by his family members. An eclipse enables the teacher and principal to steal several more fleeti...

Release Date: October 06, 1999

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Eric Mendelsohn

Writer: Eric Mendelsohn

Runtime: 1 h 33 min

Production: Caruso / Mendelsohn Productions, Shooting Gallery, Starz! Encore Entertainment

Distributor: Shooting Gallery

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 61,236

Box office:

Domestic:$61.2KWorldwide:$61.2K

-9%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -9% lower than the critics.

77%68%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

61%11%

61% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White72.22%Jewish16.67%Black11.11%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

77%68%

IMDb:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Dorothea's Rache (1974)

Summary: Dorothea, a 16-year-old bourgeois girl from Hamburg, plays with her friends of both sexes, imitating the production of adult movies. In the end, pretending to make sex-scenes is not satisfying enough, and with a street professiona...

Release Date: February 07, 1974

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Director: Peter Fleischmann

Writers: Peter Fleischmann

, Jean-Claude Carrière

Runtime: 1 h 32 min

Production: Hallelujah Films, Stéphan Films

Countries: France, West Germany

Language: German

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

44%0%

44% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White100%

2.00

LGBTQ content included:

lesbian

This film gets a 2.00/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

The Boat That Rocked (2009)

Summary: A band of rogue DJs that captivated Britain, playing the music that defined a generation and standing up to a government that wanted classical music, and nothing else, on the airwaves.

Release Date: November 13, 2009

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Music

Director: Richard Curtis

Writer: Richard Curtis

Runtime: 1 h 57 min

MPAA: R

Production: Universal Pictures, StudioCanal, Working Title Films, Tightrope Pictures

Distributor: Universal Pictures Home Entertainment (UPHE)

Countries: United Kingdom, France, Germany, United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 50,000,000

Domestic: $ 8,017,917

International: $ 28,334,550

Box office:

Budget:$50MDomestic:$8MInternational:$28.3MWorldwide:$36.4M

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Universal Pictures

Working Title Films

N/A

No Rotten Tomatoes ratings imported yet.

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

11%6%

11% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White88.24%Black5.88%Jewish5.88%

N/A

LGBTQ content included:

lesbian

BechdeltestPassed!No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

12:08 East of Bucharest (2006)

Summary: A local talk show host organizes an alcoholic professor and a pensioner known for playing Santa Claus to decide whether there was ever a revolution in their town Vaslui.

Release Date: September 29, 2006

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Corneliu Porumboiu

Writer: Corneliu Porumboiu

Runtime: 1 h 29 min

MPAA: Unrated

Production: 42 Km Film

Distributor: Artroumain, Tartan, Palisades Tartan

Country: Romania

Language: Romanian

Movie budget: $ 200,000

Domestic: $ 91,881

International: $ 431,822

Box office:

Budget:$200KDomestic:$91.9KInternational:$431.8KWorldwide:$523.7K

-22%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -22% lower than the critics.

96%74%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

33%19%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

19% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White81.25%Asian12.5%Latino6.25%

N/A

BechdeltestNo women talkingNo MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

96%74%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

OFDb:

Methodology

Hurlyburly (1998)

Summary: Hollywood movers and shakers dissect their own personal lives when everything seems to clash together.

Release Date: December 25, 1998

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Anthony Drazan

Writer: David Rabe

Runtime: 2 h 02 min

MPAA: R

Production: FilmColony, Storm Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 15,000,000

Domestic: $ 1,798,862

International: $ 9,142

Box office:

Budget:$15MDomestic:$1.8MInternational:$9.1KWorldwide:$1.8M

Adaptation/remake:

based on play

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this 7% higher than the critics.

58%65%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

50%6%

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White81.25%Jewish12.5%Asian6.25%

N/A

BechdeltestNo women talkingNo MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

58%65%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Digging for Fire (2015)

Summary: The discovery of a bone and a gun send a husband and wife on separate adventures over the course of a weekend.

Release Date: August 21, 2015

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Joe Swanberg

Writers: Jake Johnson

, Joe Swanberg

Runtime: 1 h 25 min

MPAA: R

Production: Garrett Motion Pictures, Walcott Company, Lucky Coffee Productions, Forager Films

Distributor: The Orchard, Paramount Home Entertainment

Country: United States

Language: English

Domestic: $ 119,364

Box office:

Domestic:$119.4KWorldwide:$119.4K

-23%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -23% lower than the critics.

64%41%

The Metacritic audience rated this -18% lower than the critics.

Metacritic Meta:

69/100

Metacritic User:

51/100

33%6%

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

6% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White77.78%Jewish16.67%Latino5.56%

0.65

Commonsensemedia

Message1/5
Role model1/5
Violence1/5
Sex4/5
Language4/5
Drugs4/5

This film gets a 0.65/5 family friendly score

Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

64%41%

Douban:

Eiga:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Metacritic:

Metacritic User:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Elevator Movie (2004)

Summary: Surreal dark comedy in which a man and a woman get stuck in an elevator and are forced to live there for several months.

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: Zeb Haradon

Writer: Zeb Haradon

Runtime: 1 h 35 min

MPAA: Not Rated

Country: United States

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 25,000

Budget:$25K

N/A

The average Rotten Tomatoes audience score is 69%.

69%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

50%33%

50% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

33% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White66.67%Latino33.33%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

69%

IMDb:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Inserts (1975)

Summary: A young, once-great Hollywood film director refuses to accept changing times during the early 1930s, and confines himself to his decaying mansion to make silent porn flicks.

Release Date: February 13, 1976

Genres: Comedy, Drama

Director: John Byrum

Writer: John Byrum

Runtime: 1 h 57 min

MPAA: NC-17

Production: Film and General Productions

Distributor: United Artists, Paramount Home Entertainment, Twilight Time

Country: United Kingdom

Language: English

Movie budget: $ 350,000

Budget:$350K

-12%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -12% lower than the critics.

67%55%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

40%0%

40% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

0% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

White80%Jewish20%

N/A

BechdeltestNo women talkingNo MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

67%55%

Douban:

IMDb:

Kinopoisk:

Moviemeter:

OFDb:

Methodology

Other sources

Parental Guide

Parental Guide: +add

MPAA Certification

No MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?

IMDb Rating

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0436607/parentalguide

last updated: 2024-10-25Update data

Commonsensemedia Rating

https://www.commonsensemedia.org

last updated: 2024-09-27Update data

Methodology

Other sources

boxofficemom.com
commonsensemedia.org
crosswalk.com

Global Consensus

Douban

rating: 6.9/10

OFDb

rating: 8/10

douban:

Submit your review:

* required

Critic Name

Enter your name or leave the field blank.

Password

Create a password or enter an existing one. ( Please remember your password or you will lose your username forever. Recovery emails are optional and can be added later in User Settings. )

Review Title

Rating*

Rating is just the typical 5 star rating you'd give the film like you'd see on any other review site.

Support*

Support is a boycott suggestion and is meant to be a way for us to consolidate our efforts in “voting with our dollars.” Obviously, Hollywood has proven that they will sacrifice profits for the sake of their agenda, but they’re not as monolithic as you’d think. And people still respond to incentives.

So the 3 options are:

Pay to watch:

This movie is worth your time, and you should support the creators financially so we get more content like it.

Watch it AND give them money.

Watch if free:

The show is entertaining, but you shouldn’t reward the creators for whatever reason. Perhaps you don't want to support preachy celebs who hate their fans. Or maybe you enjoy superhero movies and nostalgia bait, but don't want to encourage Hollywood to continue making them in such a high ratio.

That’s when you’d click the “Watch Now” button and choose from one of the “Free” links:

( Use at your own risk. ZeitgeistReviews does not endorse any of the links and we don’t condone piracy. And we definitely discourage you from using this Reddit thread that shows you all of the places to pirate movies & tv. )

Watch it BUT don’t give them money.

Skip it:

This means the movie wasn’t even worth your time. Maybe it's so full of Woke crap that you’ll want to pull your hair out half way through. Or it could simply just be a piece of s**t, and not in a "so bad it's good" kind of way.

Don’t watch it AND don’t give them money.

( Note: We have expanded our site from just TV & Movies. Now we have games and will add music/books/etc. So the wording might change but the sentiment is still the same for every "Support" section. )

Review text*

Note: Please wrap spoilers [spoiler] like this. [/spoiler]

Neo-Marxism

Neo-Marxism, (sometimes referred to as "Cultural Marxism"), rates the amount of fanatic egalitarianism in a film. Consider this mainly a rating for anti-nationalist and anti-capitalist themes.

Feminism

Strong and multidimensional female characters are fine. This is mainly referring to girlboss crap, unrealistic Mary Sue content, and/or egregious scenes of manhood being disparaged.

Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action rates how much "diversity" is being pushed. ( Not true diversity, but the anti-White checklist kind.)

Gay Stuff

Gay Stuff rates the amount of non-tradional sexuality depicted.

Fedora Tipping

Fedora Tipping rates the amount of atheism / Scientism™ in a film.

Audience Reviews:

No results found

Critic Reviews:

Submit a review link

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

All movie subreddits All TV subreddits All gaming subreddits

Comments:

Your Name:

Password:

Cancel Comment

The Motel

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

Similar Movies:

Parental Guide: +add

IMDb Rating

Commonsensemedia Rating

douban:

Submit your review:

Pay to watch:

Watch if free:

Skip it:

Additional ratings

Audience Reviews:

Critic Reviews:

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

Comments: