Heremakono

Play Trailer

Summary: The story of two people who cross paths in Nouhadhibou.

Release Date: January 15, 2003

Genres: Drama, Music

Director: Abderrahmane Sissako

Writer: Abderrahmane Sissako

Runtime: 1 h 30 min

Production: Arte France Cinéma, Duo Films

Distributor: New Yorker Films

Countries: France, Mauritania

Language: French

Movie budget: $ 1,450,000

Domestic: $ 7,406

International: $ 45,642

Box office:

Budget:$1.4MDomestic:$7.4KInternational:$45.6KWorldwide:$53K

-26%

The Rotten Tomatoes audience rated this -26% lower than the critics.

78%52%

No Metacritic ratings imported yet.

22%73%

22% of the Stars & Main Cast are Female.

73% of the Stars & Main Cast are "diverse."

Arab36.36%Black27.27%White18.18%Jewish9.09%Asian9.09%

N/A

No MPAA or IMDb parental guidance data has been imported yet.
Please help improve our site and

add a Family Friendly Rating.

CONTENT BREAKDOWN

Methodology

RottenTomatoes:

78%52%

Douban:

IMDb:

OFDb:

Methodology

Cast

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other Cast, Production

Other cast:

Production:

Representation

Star

Supporting

Other

Production

Race	Black	White	Arab	Asian	Jewish	Indian	Total	Visuals	Info
Surname	1	1	4		1	1	8		A third party free program that uses US Census data to create an algorithm that analyzes surnames and guesses what ethnicity the person is. Obviously there are issues with this data set such as African Americans who have the last names of their ancestors' slave owner. However, when no other data set is available, this can give a rough estimate and expand the data pool for the less important cast members with no IMDb or TMDb image. Please consider downloading their source code via GitHub to verify the accuracy of our data set, and to peer review our conclusions. Source: https://pypi.org/project/ethnicolr/
Familysearch	1	4		1			6
Forebears	3			1			4
Total	5	5	4	2	1	1	18
Cast Percentages	27.78%	27.78%	22.22%	11.11%	5.56%	5.56%	100%	{"name":"Cast Percentages","series":[{"name":"Black","y":27.78,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":27.78,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":22.22,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}
U.S. Population (2000) Percentage	12.3%	69.1%	0.42%	4.23%	1.85%	0.6%		{"name":"U.S. Population (2000)","series":[{"name":"White","y":69.1,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":0.42,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":4.23,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Black","y":12.3,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"Indian","y":0.6,"color":"#7798BF"},{"name":"Indigenous","y":0.9,"color":"#aaeeee"},{"name":"Latino","y":12.5,"color":"#eeaaee"},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":3.96,"color":"#55BF3B"},{"name":"Jewish","y":1.85,"color":"#ff0066"}],"prefix":""}	Source: US Census (Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (2000) Representation	+15.48	-41.32	+21.8	+6.88	+3.71	+4.96		{"name":"U.S. Population (2000)","series":[["Black",12.3],["White",69.1],["Arab",0.42],["Asian",4.23],["Jewish",1.85],["Indian",0.6]],"cast":[{"name":"Black","y":27.78,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"White","y":27.78,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":22.22,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"}]}
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Percentage	7.72%	81.25%		3.5%				{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[{"name":"White","y":6413300000000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":276400000000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":609100000000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":40300000000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":494000000000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":60300000000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: Selig Center, University of Georgia
U.S. Buying Power (2000) Representation	+20.06	-53.47		+7.61				{"name":"U.S. Buying Power (2000)","series":[["Black",7.72],["White",81.25],["Arab",0],["Asian",3.5],["Jewish",0],["Indian",0]],"cast":[{"name":"Black","y":27.78,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"White","y":27.78,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":22.22,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"}]}
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage	9.09%	75.87%		5.15%				{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[{"name":"White","y":12379223097685,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":0,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":840599779788,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":1483520178109,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":0,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":115688369276,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":1006688175500,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":490838834659,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":0,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	Source: IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation	+18.69	-48.09		+5.96				{"name":"U.S. Average Individual Income (2018)","series":[["Black",9.09],["White",75.87],["Arab",0],["Asian",5.15],["Jewish",0],["Indian",0]],"cast":[{"name":"Black","y":27.78,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"White","y":27.78,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":22.22,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"}]}
World population (2002) Percentage	11.64%	16.19%	7.73%	33.93%	0.34%	21.22%		{"name":"World population (2002) ","series":[{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":11666992036,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":35696748136,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":8526105205,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"White","y":101163632675,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":72726073172,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":212026003574,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":48323392485,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":132596647598,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":2119021178,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":""}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (2002) Representation	+16.14	+11.59	+14.49	-22.82	+5.22	-15.66		{"name":"World population (2002) ","series":[["Black",11.64],["White",16.19],["Arab",7.73],["Asian",33.93],["Jewish",0.34],["Indian",21.22]],"cast":[{"name":"Black","y":27.78,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"White","y":27.78,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":22.22,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"}]}
World Buying Power Percentage	6.38%	36.48%	6.38%	29.46%	1.11%	6.94%		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[{"name":"White","y":3010602822170000,"color":"#2b908f","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Latino","y":771525888400000,"color":"#eeaaee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Jewish","y":91700962050000,"color":"#ff0066","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Black","y":526264226360000,"color":"#f45b5b","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indigenous","y":174285727610000,"color":"#aaeeee","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Mixed \/ Other","y":148984454560000,"color":"#55BF3B","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Arab","y":526400066100000,"color":"#DF5353","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Asian","y":2431392083750000,"color":"#90ee7e","sliced":true,"selected":true},{"name":"Indian","y":572687873900000,"color":"#7798BF","sliced":true,"selected":true}],"prefix":"$"}	NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation	+21.4	-8.7	+15.84	-18.35	+4.45	-1.38		{"name":"World Buying Power","series":[["Black",6.38],["White",36.48],["Arab",6.38],["Asian",29.46],["Jewish",1.11],["Indian",6.94]],"cast":[{"name":"Black","y":27.78,"color":"#f45b5b"},{"name":"White","y":27.78,"color":"#2b908f"},{"name":"Arab","y":22.22,"color":"#DF5353"},{"name":"Asian","y":11.11,"color":"#90ee7e"},{"name":"Jewish","y":5.56,"color":"#ff0066"},{"name":"Indian","y":5.56,"color":"#7798BF"}]}
Notes			Arab Americans are less than 1% of the US population and often check "White" or "Other" on the US Census. And the only data available for them started when the US Census added ancestry in 1980. So assume a less than 1% margin of error and overlap with the "White" and "Other" categories.	The US Census considers Pakistani, Sri Lankan, Indian, and Bangladeshi as Asians. At ZR we group Pakistanis with the Arab world. And we group Sri Lankan and Bangladeshi with India because 1.) they are all genetically similar as "South Asians and 2.) there are only a handful of actors from those regions in our database. However, you are viewing the "Asian Alone" category from the US Census when comparing it with Domestic representation. Also note that the 2000 and 2010 estimates include MultiRacial Asians not just "Asian Alone" estimates, and in some categories they include Native Hawaiians as "Asian." So there is a margin of error less than 1% and some inconsistencies with the grouping.	If there were any inconsistencies with percentages calculated using our Census data, the Jewish Data Bank percentages were the ones used. Also please review the Jewish Data Bank pdf to understand the difference between the "Core" Jewish population and the "Extended" / "Law of Return" Jewish populations. We are displaying the "Core" Jewish populations since that is what the Jewish Data Bank and Wikipedia articles chose. Also, the 1942 population estimates were used for the 1940 row. For the 2000 estimates, the "Core" definition was not used, so we used the 5.2 mil broader estimate instead of the 4.3 mil estimate since the 5.2 broader estimate seemed too drastic of a drop and the definitions weren't congruent with Core and Law of Return.

Tags / Keywords

17 year old 17 year old teenage boy airplane airplane ticket airport amateur actor apprentice beach bigger dreams boat boy camera cigarette cigarette smoking dancer dancing dead body death death of daughter desert displacement doctor drink drinking dune electrician electricity emigration europe exile fabric merchant father daughter relationship flirting friend friendship handyman happiness hotel husband wife relationship impressionism isolation japanese karaoke language difficulties learning a language lightbulb lighter limbo loss of daughter mauritania mother daughter relationship mother son relationship music lesson mute observer nouhadhibou maurutania old man orphan photographer photography police portrait photograph prostitute radio restaurant roof sand saying goodbye sea seacoast search for happiness serenity ship singer singing singing lesson slingshot solitude station student taxi tea television temporary housing tire traditional music train transistor radio veil village waiting

Similar Movies

Parental Guide

Parental Guide: +add

MPAA Certification

No MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?

IMDb Rating

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0308363/parentalguide

last updated: 2024-10-25Update data

Commonsensemedia Rating

https://www.commonsensemedia.org

last updated: 2024-09-27Update data

Methodology

Other sources

boxofficemom.com
commonsensemedia.org
crosswalk.com

Global Consensus

Submit your review:

* required

Critic Name

Enter your name or leave the field blank.

Password

Create a password or enter an existing one. ( Please remember your password or you will lose your username forever. Recovery emails are optional and can be added later in User Settings. )

Review Title

Rating*

Rating is just the typical 5 star rating you'd give the film like you'd see on any other review site.

Support*

Support is a boycott suggestion and is meant to be a way for us to consolidate our efforts in “voting with our dollars.” Obviously, Hollywood has proven that they will sacrifice profits for the sake of their agenda, but they’re not as monolithic as you’d think. And people still respond to incentives.

So the 3 options are:

Pay to watch:

This movie is worth your time, and you should support the creators financially so we get more content like it.

Watch it AND give them money.

Watch if free:

The show is entertaining, but you shouldn’t reward the creators for whatever reason. Perhaps you don't want to support preachy celebs who hate their fans. Or maybe you enjoy superhero movies and nostalgia bait, but don't want to encourage Hollywood to continue making them in such a high ratio.

That’s when you’d click the “Watch Now” button and choose from one of the “Free” links:

( Use at your own risk. ZeitgeistReviews does not endorse any of the links and we don’t condone piracy. And we definitely discourage you from using this Reddit thread that shows you all of the places to pirate movies & tv. )

Watch it BUT don’t give them money.

Skip it:

This means the movie wasn’t even worth your time. Maybe it's so full of Woke crap that you’ll want to pull your hair out half way through. Or it could simply just be a piece of s**t, and not in a "so bad it's good" kind of way.

Don’t watch it AND don’t give them money.

( Note: We have expanded our site from just TV & Movies. Now we have games and will add music/books/etc. So the wording might change but the sentiment is still the same for every "Support" section. )

Review text*

Note: Please wrap spoilers [spoiler] like this. [/spoiler]

Neo-Marxism

Neo-Marxism, (sometimes referred to as "Cultural Marxism"), rates the amount of fanatic egalitarianism in a film. Consider this mainly a rating for anti-nationalist and anti-capitalist themes.

Feminism

Strong and multidimensional female characters are fine. This is mainly referring to girlboss crap, unrealistic Mary Sue content, and/or egregious scenes of manhood being disparaged.

Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action rates how much "diversity" is being pushed. ( Not true diversity, but the anti-White checklist kind.)

Gay Stuff

Gay Stuff rates the amount of non-tradional sexuality depicted.

Fedora Tipping

Fedora Tipping rates the amount of atheism / Scientism™ in a film.

Audience Reviews:

No results found

Critic Reviews:

Submit a review link

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

All movie subreddits All TV subreddits All gaming subreddits

Comments:

Your Name:

Password:

Cancel Comment

Heremakono

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

Parental Guide: +add

IMDb Rating

Commonsensemedia Rating

Submit your review:

Pay to watch:

Watch if free:

Skip it:

Additional ratings

Audience Reviews:

Critic Reviews:

YouTube:

Internet Zeitgest:

Reddit:

Comments: