Show more

Withnail and I

Summary: In 1969, two substance-abusing, unemployed actors retreat to the countryside for a holiday that proves disastrous.
Runtime: 1 h 47 min
MPAA: R

Language: English
Movie budget: $ 1,100,000
Domestic: $ 1,544,889
International: $ 405,734

Box office:

Budget:$1.1MDomestic:$1.5MInternational:$405.7KWorldwide:$2M

Box office International:

Source: The Numbers

N/A
24%6%
White93.75%Black6.25%
0.10

LGBTQ content included:

gay, homosexual, homosexuality

BechdeltestNo women talking

Commonsensemedia

Violence2/5
Sex2/5
Language5/5
Drugs5/5

Please help improve our site and
Add Comment
Write a Review
Submit Review Link
Edit Family Friendly Rating

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

RaceWhiteJewishBlackLatinoTotalVisualsInfo
Kairos819
A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like.

Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos

Ethnic437
This is the most reliable data source for accurate ethnic breakdowns of famous people. Often the information is crowdsourced by users and they cite all their sources (family trees, obituaries, census archives, etc.) on the bottom of the page. The only issue is converting their ambiguous and inconsistent verdicts into quantifiable variables.

Source: https://ethnicelebs.com/

Forebears213
Jew11
Believe it or not, this website is actually ran by proud Jews who just poke fun at themselves. However, they celebrate Judaism and Ashkenazi DNA. Their verdicts are varied and have humorous opinions added, but we filter them into a quantifiable binary Jewish or not variable. Unlike Ethnicelebs, this data set uses religion when determining if a person is Jewish or not, even if they have zero Ashkenazi DNA.

Source: http://www.jewornotjew.com/

Surname11
A third party free program that uses US Census data to create an algorithm that analyzes surnames and guesses what ethnicity the person is. Obviously there are issues with this data set such as African Americans who have the last names of their ancestors' slave owner. However, when no other data set is available, this can give a rough estimate and expand the data pool for the less important cast members with no IMDb or TMDb image. Please consider downloading their source code via GitHub to verify the accuracy of our data set, and to peer review our conclusions.

Source: https://pypi.org/project/ethnicolr/

Familysearch11
Total1551122
Cast Percentages68.18%22.73%4.55%4.55%100%
U.S. Population (2020) Percentage57.84%2.02%12.4%18.73%
Source:
US Census
(Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (2020) Representation+10.34+20.71-7.85-14.18
U.S. Buying Power (2018) Percentage74.35%7.96%9.42%
U.S. Buying Power (2018) Representation-6.17-3.41-4.87
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage65.34%9.43%9.51%
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation+2.84-4.88-4.96
World population (2016) Percentage14.56%0.34%13.9%5.65%
NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (2016) Representation+53.62+22.39-9.35-1.1
World Buying Power Percentage36.48%1.11%6.38%9.35%
NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation+31.7+21.62-1.83-4.8
Notes
If there were any inconsistencies with percentages calculated using our Census data, the Jewish Data Bank percentages were the ones used. Also please review the Jewish Data Bank pdf to understand the difference between the "Core" Jewish population and the "Extended" / "Law of Return" Jewish populations. We are displaying the "Core" Jewish populations since that is what the Jewish Data Bank and Wikipedia articles chose.

Also, the 1942 population estimates were used for the 1940 row. For the 2000 estimates, the "Core" definition was not used, so we used the 5.2 mil broader estimate instead of the 4.3 mil estimate since the 5.2 broader estimate seemed too drastic of a drop and the definitions weren't congruent with Core and Law of Return.
Many Latinos check "White" or "Other" on the Census. So this overlaps with "Mixed" race and "White."

Also, when there was a discrepancy with the percentage listed on the Wikipedia table and our calculated numbers, the Wiki table's numbers were used. Likewise, when the population total was missing from the Census pdf, the estimate was calculated using the percentage from the Wiki table.


NOTE: It turns out that the reason America doesn't have a separate "Latino" race is because the League of Latin American Citizens protested against discrimination towards Mexicans and got themselves to legally be considered "White."

Check the research links in our Google Doc for more info.

1960sactoralcoholicalcoholismampersand in titleanxietyapronarrestaspirinathleteauditionautobiographicalbaldnessbathbathtubbedblack comedybootsbriefsbritish renaissancebuddybullbumburned handcafecakecamden town londoncandlecannabiscard playingcatcharacter name in titlechickencidercigar smokingcigarettecigarette smokingclockcoffeeconservativeconstruction sitecookingcottagecountry cottagecountrysidecowcreekcult filmdark comedydarknessdegradationdialogue drivendogdolldrama schooldreams of stardomdrinkdrinkingdriving under the influencedrug dealerdrug usedrunk drivingdrunkennesseccentriceelenglandenglish countrysideeviction noticeeyeglassesfaithfulnessfarmfarmerfarmhousefather son relationshipfearfictional drugfightfishflatmateflatulencefoodforgivenessfriendfriendshipgayginglobegoatgrungegunfirehaircuthairdresserheart conditionhippiehomosexualhomosexualityhuntingillnessindependent filminner monologueironyjaguarjaguar the carjewjimi hendrixkeykitchenlake districtlanternlighter fluidlondon englandlovelow budget filmmale female relationshipmale police officermarijuanamedicinemen's bathroommillionairemoneymother son relationshipmulti millionaireneighbornewspaperout of work actorovenparanoiapark benchpenrhys walesperfumepheasantphotographpillplastic bagplastic bag over one's legplastic bags on feetplierspoacherpolicepoliticspovertypubpunctuation in titlerabbitrainratreckless drivingreference to donald wolfitreference to journey's end the playreference to michael redgravereference to r. c. sherriffreference to shakespeare's hamletreference to william shakespearerefugeerestaurantriflerolls royceroommaterubber glovesrural settingscotchsense of smellsharing a bedshavingsherryshootingshooting a fishshotgunsleeping on a sofasleeplessnesssmoking a jointsmoking marijuanasoupsqualorstarvingsteroidstrangulationsubstance abuseteatea roomtearoomtelegramtelephonetheater productiontheatrical agentthermostatthinnessthirty somethingthree word titletimeframe 1960stv commercialtv showtwenty somethinguncle nephew relationshipunderwearunemployed actorunemploymentunwashed dishesurinationurinevacation gone wrongvaliumvoice over narrationvomitingweekend getawaywellington bootswhiskeywildernesswindshield wiperwinewolfwrecking ballwriteryear 1969

Similar Movies:

Other sources

Parental Guide: +add

This film gets a 0.1/5 family friendly score

MPAA CertificationNo MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?

IMDb Rating

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094336/parentalguide

last updated: 2024-10-26Update data

Commonsensemedia Rating

https://www.commonsensemedia.org/movie-reviews/withnail-i

last updated: 2024-10-26Update data

Message
0/5

Despite its comedic tone, alcoholism is at the heart of the movie. Characters struggle to overcome their addictions and climb out of the dire professional and financial situations they find themselves in.

Role model
0/5

Both Withnail and Marwood are struggling professionally and financially. They both have an unhealthy affliction for alcohol and subsequently struggle to take control of their lives. Marwood does have a conscience and strives to do right, but Withnail is reckless and irresponsible. He breaks the law when driving drunk and without a license. Supporting characters offer little by way of optimism and hope, with Monty making sexual advances toward Marwood in a somewhat forceful and predatory way.

Violence
2/5

A character wields a hunting rifle indoors, and prods a chicken carcass with it. He accidentally shoots the gun into the ceiling. Another scene sees threat come in the form of an angry and intimidating bull. Some sexual behavior could be described as predatory and forceful.

Sex
2/5

There is suggestion of a young actor trading sex for roles in the industry. Character attempts to seduce another into bed, but they manage to break free. Some nudity in the form of a picture of a topless model on a bathroom wall. 

Language
5/5

The language is consistent and frequent. Countless uses of the word "f--k" and "f--k off." "Bastard" is also used frequently, as is "s--t." Discriminatory language includes a character being called a "raving homosexual," "toilet trader," and "ponce." Use of racist language when a black character is referred to as a "spade." There are two uses of the word "c--t." Character shouts at school children out of a car window, calling them "tarts" and encouraging people to throw themselves into the road.

Drugs
5/5

Barely a scene passes without seeing the characters smoking cigarettes and drinking alcohol. They don't just drink alcohol, they talk about their dependency on it, struggling to kill time before the pubs open. In there desperation for alcohol, characters resort to drinking lighter fluid. Characters openly discuss their desire to get drunk or "wrecked" and are frequently shown to be under the influence. In one scene, characters cause a commotion in a cafe when they demand more wine. One character is stopped for driving recklessly while inebriated. A character rolls a mammoth joint of cannabis, which is smoked communally with the participants becoming incredibly high.

Methodology
Other sources

Douban
Douban
rating: 7.8/10
Douban
Eiga
Eiga
rating: 3.6/5
OFDb
OFDb
rating: 6.5/10
OFDb

🇨🇳 douban:

Submit your review:

* required
0
Note: Please wrap spoilers [spoiler] like this. [/spoiler]

0
0
0
0
0

Audience Reviews:

Total found: 1. Show in Search

Critic Reviews:

Total found: 13. Show in Search

Internet Zeitgest:

Comments: