+ it’s also dark and depressing throughout, and perhaps has a cynical downer ending. It has both anti-traditional and anti-science themes simultaneously? For what that’s worth

The important thing is that you know what you’re getting into. It’s a horror movie in 2024, with all that implies.

there’s dune2 pvp https://youtu.be/3Na8dBWi-Jc

Was this review generated with AI? No offense, it just seems very structured in an a way you don’t usually see for reviews

Totally agree. It can’t get out of its own way and the dialogue made my skin crawl. I peaced out at the part where it seemed as if we’d finally leave Blunt behind and have a kino driving scene and she pops back into frame like a bad rash with more pointless blathering.

Hmmm, can’t seem to figure out what you’re referring to. Can you elaborate?

—

This film rules dude. 

This review does not make any judgement about the film, it only judges other reviewers. It does not talk about the merits (or lack therof) of brokeback mountain.

The poster alone is enough to make me regurgitate the tangerine I just ate. It was a pretty good tangerine, but this movie is a vom bucket. And judging from how she looks here compared to the poster for ‘The Thing About Pam’, they must have spent half the budget on Zellweger’s deaging cgi.

Don’t listen to that faggot kike. Appreciate what you do, please don’t let this shit die.

Here is the music generation from the neural network of Suno Ai on the theme of this piece:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqCAxGQvfjI&list=RDOqCAxGQvfjI

Awesome, thanks so much for your work! 
Although, just checking it now, I am logged in, but there’s no link on the review itself to edit/delete it. And when I go to my user profile I see the option ‘Edit Review’ (no option to delete tho) but when I click it nothing happens…

It is possible to teach AI to write without structure and with errors. But whether the essence will be conveyed better in such a form is a big question.

In a modern context, this parable can serve as an illustration of how various woke-minorities take advantage of the kindness and tolerance of the true masters to dictate their agenda.

Lol cry more.

Video review with a contrarian (positive) recommendation. Argent claims
that the movie isn’t woke, and the arguments show that it isn’t
*explicitly*. Argents threshold for wokeness seems pretty tolerant of
it, but his points stand.

Lots of spoilers in the review, Argent goes through pretty much the entire plot.

lmao – they rip off Memento and have the balls to call the protagonist Nolan?

My one suggestion is that you shouldn’t necessarily have given up on the ‘RightWingTomatoes’ parody name. It’s just an amazing and immediately intuitive brand name recognition thing. Easy to remember and says immediately what it is and what it’s for. I imagine it’s what brought most people here and garnered you attention in the first place (it’s certainly what first brought me here). And I don’t think it necessarily signals a boomer normiecon kind of worldview anymore. The ‘right-wing’ label in popular understanding is increasingly extending beyond that to the ‘alt’ and ‘dissident’ edges. And besides, you say you welcome all perspectives, right?

Also I must say it seems kind of silly for this, of all sites, to be censoring ‘slurs’.

Anyhow, just my tuppence. Thanks for creating and running this thing!

It’s all good, part of the fun is shitting on it afterwards. I mean compared to ‘Elizabethtown’, Dog Park was fucking oscar material.

nigga, is this an ai slop response? 

turing test: failed

You will now be recycled as a dildo for ur crimes against humanity